Jump to content

Gunrunner

+PLATINUM MEMBER
  • Content count

    1,363
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Everything posted by Gunrunner

  1. Macros are also useful for flare/chaff release on modern birds, instead of mashing the buttons you push once and it releases x CM over y time, by using nested menus you can make it "programmable".
  2. The mods part should be in c:\users\[username]\Saved Games\ThirdWire
  3. A primer/undercoat is a layer of paint you apply before your actual paint, either to increase adhesion, protect from corrosion/rust/other environmental elements, enhance shadows when talking about model painting, or a mix of all. Zinc-chromate is one such primer used in the aviation industry since at least WW2, and it's well, yellow.
  4. Finally ! Some love for the CR, can't wait for earlier standard. Thanks Ludo and team.
  5. Nope, the trick only works on flat parts. Imagine you have two connected textured cubes, only their interface (the part where they meet) isn't textured or even mapped to be textured. What you propose to do in this specific instance is to make all the textures of one cube transparent, opening a visual hole letting you see into the other. It can be done, it doesn't look good.
  6. Just chiming in... If you go that direction, there are two ways to distribute this kind of mods that won't go against TK's intellectual rights : - Distribute replacement DLL/EXE using only new code. (What OpenTTD is to Transport Tycoon Deluxe, even though the "new" code on early versions was questionnable) - Distribute a patcher and patches. (What TTDPatch was to Transport Tycoon Deluxe) The reverse engineering is, in most jurisdictions, not illegal, so long as what you're reverse engineering has been obtained legally, and you're not illegally redistributing what you obtained from it. Then there is the contractual issues, by installing SF2 we agree to a long forgotten EULA, does that EULA prevent reverse-engineering ? Is that EULA legally enforceable ? Is TK still willing to defend it ? Mods tend to frown upon it because allowing it would open a can of worm, with many people not understand what they can and can't do, exposing the site to legal consequences for facilitating it. I don't agree with the heavy handed approach at times on these topics but I completely understand why as it could turn into a shitshow extremely fast.
  7. Those are J-10s not J-20s. But yes, you're owed royalties for the idea, try contacting Xi.
  8. Wait, Facebook is still around ?
  9. Also, check the mission ranges. If there is a valid base, a valid plane, but the range of the plane can't put it in a mission interceptable at compatible range with the plane you chose, it will crash too. Once had that on an install, launching from a carrier, and crashed, because in the era I played, the closest enemy base supporting compatible target aircraft was too far for my flight and the enemy flight to ever meet due to the max mission ranges.
  10. IIRC, Sea Power, they're Triassic Games, they were (with ?) Killerfish previously, they already published War on the Sea, Atlantic Fleet, Pacific Fleet and Cold Waters. As much as a loss it is to SF2, they seem to have life happen to them and seem to be on a reasonnably succesful roll so I'm glad for them.
  11. Well, Julhelm is working with Stary on a naval simulator with the revived Microprose as an editor. So I guess he hasn't much free time on his hands these days.
  12. Yes, you set up your DSR ratio in the control panel, it then opens higher resolutions in SF2 graphic options, chose these resolutions higher than your monitor native resolution and the driver will automatically use them and rescale to your native resolution. Let's say I have a 1920x1200 monitor, when I go into the graphic tabs of SF2, the maximum resolution will be shown as 1920x1200, but if I went into the nVidia Control Panel and activated a 4x DSR ratio, the 3840x2400 resolution would also be available, if I select it, the image displayed would still be in 1920x1200 perfectly fitting my monitor but it would be downscaled from 3840x2400 automatically, giving better image quality through finer color rather than spatial resolution.
  13. So, I read some uninformed bullshit that made my head hurt, I'll leave this here because I'm lazy and would end up being rude :
  14. DLSS I don't know, but DSR yes, that's what I run. Just make sure to select the higher resolution in SF2 after making the change in the control panel. Don't worry, even if it's larger than your monitor's resolution the drivers will downscale it automatically to it.
  15. Have you heard of our Lords and Saviours DSR and DLSS ? Not only does it provide better images than any AA mode, but it also comes at a fraction of the cost on most older games (for DSR) and many newer ones (for DLSS when supported).
  16. There should be no issue, at some point there was a black screen bug if your Effects Detail were set at Unlimited rather than High but I'm not even sure that's still a problem. The bulk of problems were during the late 9x0 / early 10x0 series era if memory serves.
  17. Purely at the top of my head after only a few hours of sleep... so, grain of salt and all that. To determine which plane to spawn the game searches for planes that : - Have the required range for the mission assigned. - Are capable of the mission assigned. - Belong to a nation assigned to the map or, failing that, are marked Exported to the right side (Enemy or Friendly). - Has compatible Start and End dates (either specific to the nation, or as export). - Succeeds at a random roll based on their availability, if the enemy nation only has one VERY_RARE plane type available, they will hardly show, if they're VERY_COMMON, they will usually show. That's for the plane showing up or not part. For the skin part, we'd need to see the INIs, my guess is that there's no specific Angolan skin for the MiG-15 so it uses the first export client for the ENEMY side, which happens to be China ? At times it pays to be hyper specific in your INI definitions, or duplicate planes in order to have granular control over what shows up, where and when, but it can become a pain in the backside.
  18. Didn't you mean, "good luck with DAT" ? (Ok, ok, I'm out...)
  19. Combatace access issues.

    Had them on occasion a few months ago too, on both Chrome and Edge, but usually reloading the page solved them. Haven't had them in a while.
  20. Damn, that looks like absolutely stellar work. I understand the frustration but now that you know the limit, can't you find a few places to replace some tiles by more generic ones, losing a bit in details and gaining in repetition inland and in places not needing as much details while keeping the details for the coastlines and major target areas ? It would be a pity to just throw your work out. It's a pain but that's what happens when you try to push the envelope beyond what has been done before. That being said, the index stopping at 846 is weird. Damn, must be tired, somehow I missed that @Menrva had the exact same advice.
  21. Isn't that still punishable by death ? Lives could have been lost. It's an unredeemable level of ass-hatery, this kind of piece of trash has no place in civilian life either.
  22. Interesting... a kitbash of the 9e and 14, meant as a late production 9e ? Sorcerer ! Burn him !
  23. CTD can occur when the engine can't create a mission because the range of the available planes are too short or no valid plane/unit for a mission role required for the mission generated for the player can be found. Either it can't find a valid objective for the player flight or can't create a target/intercept flight for opposing force. With some terrain that happens more often in campaign than single mission because the engine has to respect the rules of the campaign meaning it has less options regarding which base to operate from, which target to use and so on. That is often a problem with jet planes from the 50's and early 60's as they often have particularly short legs. I usually artificially increase the range of the planes that can be concerned, an alternative is to change the available mission types to exclude those requiring other flights (player STRIKE doesn't require an enemy INTERCEPT apparently but player INTERCEPT requires an enemy STRIKE duh, player ESCORT requires an ally STRIKE, player SWEEP requires an enemy CAP (but I don't think a player CAP requires an enemy SWEEP), player CAS/ARMED RECON requires available enemy ground targets and so on...). I'm thinking of this especially because it is a test campaign with only a few units, meaning the engine has a very limited choice of enemy units to assign as target and it might not have one in range (or capable of the mission countering the one assigned to the player).
  24. Well, let's say in my install the French Air Force had an airbase in Dhimar from 1950 to 1968, then left it to the USAF from 1968 to 1986, where they came back and use it to this day. In my Dhimar terrain nation list I'll have terrain specific nation entries for FranceDhimar5068 and FranceDhimar86xx but no reference to simply France (because the player can fly anything, anywhere provided it's the right timeframe), references to these terrain specific nations would exist in my planes, their skins, loadouts, userlists, that way I control exactly what shows up where and when, in what skin, with what loadout. I also do a lot of duplication, but to deal with weird loadouts, nation specific designations but mostly to make a distinction between player and AI planes. Player plane designations are precise, AI ones are as fuzzy as possible because I don't want the HUD to tell me this is a Spanish C.12 from 1975, I just want it to tell me it's a F-4. AI planes have a lot of entries meant for terrain-specific nations, player ones have entries only for nations I intend to fly (to the point of culling planes and entries for nations I don't intend to fly, relegating them to AI only planes). I also do a lot of weapon duplication to take advantage of SpecificStationCodes, to the point some weapons have one duplicate per plane/nation, allowing me very fine control of what shows up on what plane and when. So, whereas you have a gigantic list of planes, each with their specific name, my actual files are probably as numerous, for different reasons, but I have only a small fraction of them showing up and while I may have dozens of entries for the same thing, I'll only see one name for all. I'm not saying my way is better than yours, far from it... just that it better suits my tastes and needs... In fact I started by doing something very similar to you before the clutter, redundancies and the fact that it didn't help some other issues led me to my current madness.
  25. Weeeeellllll... I'm happy you find this to work for you... Certainly not the way I do it or would want to deal with it but hey, to each his own, my way is equally (if not even more) insane after all. Glad to see we're all a little bit insane. :-D
×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..