Jump to content

EricJ

+PLATINUM MEMBER
  • Content count

    11,627
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    61

Everything posted by EricJ

  1. Sigh... It's not political correctness, it's a plain poor attitude, and best reserved for somewhere else, not here.
  2. More work, adding some more color (I may tweak the nose area as well) but coming along slowly:
  3. Getting the nose setup. It'll generally follow the Su-25T pattern (of course adjusted for the particular airframe) for lack of imagination but overall will probably down the line be tweaked to look somewhat better.
  4. Version

    60 downloads

    The same style as below, this is a "later" skin for a Block II Super Hornet as opposed for the previous Blk I version. This too can be used on the F version (though slight differences in fuselage will of course change the appearance).
  5. Okie, tomorrow I'll start working on the A-10A/C Splinter that I used on the Su-25T above.
  6. True the big ones just don't have that maneuverability that the -12s and -16s can do. Granted that is a bad profile anyway.... But if you can load JDAMs you'll get more play rather than LGBs all of the time. Amd those will work fine
  7. Shit sorry for not answering man.... Usually the larger the bombs, the more pain in the ass they are, as I usually bomb from high up with -10s and -24s and not always low level (I don't always bomb with those, usually -12s or -16s). But needless to say start out farther out until you can perfect a drop with those bombs. And I'd suggest the Bombing Range to do that as well, if you haven't downloaded it already. It'll help you practice without distractions (other than the unnecessary escort flights).
  8. Look at the file date man, this looks like a LOMAC file, NOT a DCS one...
  9. Some MP stuff last night and letting the Heavy have his way...
  10. Dude as much as I've trapped.... I'd be kicked out of flight school. I trap don't get me wrong, but never have done a "real" flight profile at all.
  11. Well now that I've cooled off some more after I get done with some Arma 3 work I'm gonna get a Ferris A-10C done sometime.
  12. VFA-35 Line Blk II [Fictional]

    Version

    48 downloads

    Much like the Blk I version, this represents a Block II jet, with appropriately changed tail insignia to represent a "change" and so on. Also can be used on the F version if preferred.
  13. I don't know why I can't post on my own topic but you can... No worries. Sigh.... it's not ED being retarded (well in a way they were) but this is why I got banned: Sukhoi25 has just replied to a thread you have subscribed to entitled - Super Hornet for DCS - in the DCS Mods forum of ED Forums. This thread is located at:http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=144327&goto=newpost Here is the message that has just been posted:***************Eric, i'll suggest you to add also the AIM-9X to weapons if not already planned ;) Meantwhile, the Block II SH doesn't have an AESA Raytheon APG-79 (capability to lock up at 20 A/A, A/G or A/S targets and combat 10 of them, if i remember right) and _not_ APG-73. There was an excellent website with radar dates if i find the link, i'll get back to you!*************** They assumed (incorrectly) that I had received such data (which I didn't) and banned me. So in all honesty I've deleted everything related to DCS on the websites (except for here) and removed it from my computer, as well as removed a lot of contacts related to the company. That shithead put a bullseye on me and frankly I've had it myself since apparently I got fucked over somebody's stupidity. So given it's not total public knowledge I can't do anything related to DCS because they'll assume I'm out to fuck them, so fuck them too And regardless they in a way did the right thing, only the Moderatror (my guess it was shitspawn who did it and didn't request an Admin to review my PMs before banning me) did it so fast that one second I was posting, went back to edit the topic and next thing I know I was banned).. I'm sick of the redonkulous games they play anyway man, all they do is fuck you and expect to do it with a smile.
  14. Well yeah me getting banned over something that wasn't my fault pretty much shows that their moderation is piss poor that's for sure. But yeah there's I guess some "belief" that since its on WikiLeaks it's "Okay" and therefore who cares right? Well given I'm a US Citizen I'd have a lot of three letter agencies in my business and so on, so how that happened is how it happened, and so on. But I don't think it's a thing against modding, it's a reaction against possible litigation, which is a big concern.
  15. Also by the by, got some INI tweaks from FANATIC MODDER who helped tweak the birds some more. Overall effect is that pitch is smoother as well as various other tweaks, to include some slat fixes. Radars are still APG-73 though. Here's the actual ini's (as well as the missing VFA-105 skin that somehow disappeared) but overall looks and feels good and ONLY the inis are in this zip, along with the "missing" VFA-105 skin. Super Hornet INI Update Package 2.7z
  16. I know, but what happened is hard to wash off and hard to forget as well. But otherwise it'd be great if more established groups get to workin, I mean I have a thing for the A-7 (USAF or USN) in a small way as well as the Intruder, but as said, promises but no action, and kinda leaves us hanging.
  17. Fair enough, and in my case (or team's case rather) when you got morons offering you to send classified data makes it real hard to move forward. I mean seriously do they think it's "cool' to do so? But anyway yeah, had that not happened it would have been in full swing.
  18. I fly Normal, and pretty much good to go with that, as Hard is a bit too unrealistic even for my tastes.
  19. My only curious question is how does it take so long even without using sensitive information? I mean before the Super Hornet project was nixed I was looking at less than a month to get a flyable prototype (the AI could fly it at least reasonably well) working. And even then back on SimHQ I predicted an FC level version with six months (man was I wrong, in a good way). So yeah okay, ED hasn't been much help given the lack of documentation but overall... I figured if we kept on trucking as they were, within two months we probably would have at least the E and F in a flyable condition to include basic weapons use and texture work done (even with a small or large list of basic liveries). So... Granted yeah okay, they got other things going but overall even that two week period we were killing it easy. So I don't see how it's so difficult.
  20. I think it has to do with Russian culture as opposed to always just being a bunch of dicks, well... that's what it ends up looking like anyway...
×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..