Jump to content

EricJ

+PLATINUM MEMBER
  • Content count

    11,632
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    61

Everything posted by EricJ

  1. Me: F/A-18F Block II with 8 x AIM-120D, 2 x AIM-9X, gun Opposition: F-14 (Iran) (a bit wrongly configured) 2 x AIM-23C, gun Now we'll go ahead and defeat the Tomcat with some long range weapons. Unfortunately the Tomcat got off both shots before I could lock onto the jet. So instead of climbing I dove and flew above the sea, breaking the lock easily and flying until I could get my shots off. Once I did (unfortunately I fired two instead of the necessary one). Takeaways: Using the Block II was a different experience since my EPE has a more tweaked radar system but that doesn't matter, I took it on instinct to hit the deck as it was and then was able to fire back. Of course I knew the setup so it wasn't too difficult to wait until both missiles were defeated and strike back.
  2. Me: F/A-18F EPE with 6 x AIM-120D, 4 x AIM-9X, gun, tank Opposition: (a bit wrongly configured) 4 x IRIS-T, 2 x AIM-23C, gun Well since this was just a range test and not a pure combat test the Sedjiil has a good range (I would say) 82 miles to 79 miles depending on profile. And yes I was shot down as the AIM-23C seems to be modeled on the Phoenix (just slightly, it moved possibly way too fast) but in the end, got me. Takeaways. Like any long-ranged capable fighter, strike it first. Granted I had about a good twenty mile advantage with the D model AMRAAM, it's quite surprising how fast the Sedjiil intercepted me. Given the fact it was based off of the original its not surprising.
  3. Believe it or not I don't, this is enough for me so it was actually somewhat informative... (sorry had to say it). But I do think that it should tie up the topic though.
  4. Going vertical after some weapon testing (B only)
  5. Maybe but if you can score one on Amazon I'd suggest it. Also, if your assigned button isn't triggering, it could be a bad button. The FLY5 is a great concept, but its not what I would consider reliable. I have to be careful as the stick on my Logitech gets loose (solved by pushing it down, a quick test and she's good to go) If I stuff it in a backpack, etc. But I deployed with one to Afghanistan and came back with another one (I had lost the other one) and been sold on it since. I could buy a more expensive one, but it works and its simple, but reliable. If you have another flight sim or something to test the button on it may be worth it to see if the button just doesn't work. In that case you'll have to use less stick and more keyboard but... you'll be okay if that's your only option.
  6. Personally I'd ditch the stick and get something more reliable. I've used those two years ago and their just not worth the headache. If you're looking for a reasonable and reliable(!) stick, get a Logitech 3D stick.
  7. I thought of the same thing, wondering where it was after watching the movie.
  8. Well you got me after that saisran, I'm nowhere near an FM guru to save my life, so maybe a more experienced opinion would help, as I really don't see the need for that much speed (couldn't resist...) so really as far as that I just don't know, sorry.
  9. MachLimit does what it says, it limits the airframe to a certain Mach number (whether or not the plane can actually go that fast...) but in the case of the Super Duper Tomcat it may be the issue causing some of the problems saisran is having with her plane.
  10. MachLimit= May also be an issue, in the [Flight Control] section.
  11. Update for Block II aircraft, mainly jammer-wise: [ECM] ReferenceName=AN/ALQ-214 SystemType=ECM_JAMMER JammerType=DUAL_MODE JammerStrength=108.0 MinFreq=2.0 MaxFreq=40.0 CanJamCW=TRUE MinExtentPosition=-0.404,-2.859,0.608 MaxExtentPosition=0.404,-0.824,1.018
  12. Or Stratos, here as well.... http://www.jpsmodell.de/dc/luft_e.htm
  13. Still WIP but I think I'll need a helicarrier next
  14. File Name: F/A-18E Block II VFA-25 CAG File Submitter: EricJ File Submitted: 11 March 2013 File Category: SF2 Series Add On Skins A rendition of VFA-25's new CAG jet. Some textures from SidDogg's rendition of the legacy Hornet were used in this skin. Eric Johnson, 2013 Drop in your FA-18E_BlkII folder and go fly. Click here to download this file
  15. F/A-18E Block II VFA-25 CAG

    Version

    131 downloads

    A rendition of VFA-25's new CAG jet. Some textures from SidDogg's rendition of the legacy Hornet were used in this skin. Eric Johnson, 2013 Drop in your FA-18E_BlkII folder and go fly.
  16. We already have that PDF and it's all dependent on whether or not FC can get around to doing it. Plus Brain32 MIGHT do the cockpit so it has been in the works, just I was opting for a more test bed approach than so much a public release. Fact is that there haven't been any buyers (though the USN has been reportedly looking into some of the improvements). So I tend to go with the flow if its going to be used and if not well... I can hope too.
  17. Its in the downloads section, it was a prototype that FC did a while back. F-103 thunderwarrior.
  18. Version

    43 downloads

    For the FA-18F_BlkII, this represents a fictional CAG jet if VF-1 wasn't disbanded and kept in Navy service. Some textures from a PDF (author unknown) for the original VF-1 F-14 Just drop in the appropriate folder and go fly. Eric Johnson, 2013
  19. Just have to say the best anti-radar killer.
  20. I'm sure the Thunderwarrior can help you (stats and stuff) to achieve your dream machine. Going Mach 3 is only limited by terrain of course...
  21. Learn how to program. In short you can use the F4 padlock (default) and use that as an "HMD" but if you want something on the scale of LOMAC/FC/DCS you'll need to program it in.
×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..