Jump to content

EricJ

+PREMIER MEMBER
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content count

    10,724

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    58

Everything posted by EricJ

  1. Haven't gotten a chance to fly it yet, but was wondering... any newer versions planned? like SMT, or -K or KUB?
  2. If I remember right, the TMF A version is setup already to use the dual rail system. On the other hand, the E/F/G loads a seperate pylon (the LAU-115CA) to accommodate them, the TMF is an actual model pylon to allow it to load dual AMRAAM pylons. So it's not the aircraft, it's SF2. And additionally, it never was tested under SF2, it was specificially made for the WoX series.
  3. Good stuff man, been waiting for some decent -29s
  4. Not bad, not much into the Century series aircraft but can say this one looks allright
  5. Well you're not the only one who's brain is not there yet. Spent yesterday in the sun supporting a mission and a bit drained still. Regardless, I applied them to the SH's and it seemed a bit more stable, maybe a little more "tighter" feeling but overall not bad
  6. I'll have to see on that, I notice too yes, it sits higher (you should have seen it at the beginning) than normal. I'll muck with it and see what I can get.
  7. I put that in there because realistically, it's a 3D object, with no countermeasure properties whatsoever, or it's just there.
  8. I had actually considered doing this one, but got lazy, nice
  9. No comment. After a long day, no comment, not at you Dave, but.... yeah. And honestly why I didn't post any information, I figured the little trouble I put in to making it would pan out. I'll leave it alone because I'm just too tired to get annoyed, or really I'd get banned myself.
  10. Well honestly not sure, I don't use rudder at all (shock to the "purists" but I like my plane relatively stable) but will have to investigate. Hasn't been reported by anybody else other than the stability when landing or otherwise. Again thanks!
  11. I am serious, and don't call me Surely
  12. Yes, VAQ-129 is the FRS (Fleet Replacement Squadron) for line units (once they get replaced by Growlers). The Marines so far have stuck to the Prowlers though.
  13. serverandenforcer. Yep we've known about it (it's mentioned in the readme). FC troubleshooted it as much as he could but pretty much that's what everybody (to include me) has to deal with. Thanks for the reminder gbnavy61, I honestly don't even use the ground radar so for the whole time I didn't even think about it. And thanks!
  14. I'm not sure if it's a PC issue. Vampyre reported it but didn't think much of it because it doesn't happen on my computer, so that's what I chalked it up as.... gbnavy61: Ehh.... this is off of the MF A HUD, so not too sure if it's just the model setting and the A HUD being incorporated. Gotcha on the seats. And thanks all
  15. Marcfighters Su-27 and the Su-30/Su-27PU is good.
  16. Just an update, 'm gonna have to break it down into a few parts, it's not going well uploading (what I think) larger than 20MB files, and with 7z, 30MB in size, so my tomorrow morning I'll try it again. But as said no more updates/recommendations will upload soonest.
  17. Just remember to reference me as purchasing the model, and AmokFloo for optimizing it for TW sims.. Any progress btw?
  18. It's probably too big SidDogg, but at least you can read it And not an epic mod by the least, just well-done IMHO zmatt..
  19. Like Spectre_USA said, it could be another program that's doing it. I run it on Vista as well and other than the AVG warning, it runs fine. Either it could be something as simple as a stuck key.
  20. Yup Waiting for the call and two mountain shots.
  21. I had just recently "upgraded" to the Community Weapons pack 2.52 and if you want a good, concise Red Air weapons selection... that's the thing to get.
  22. Ahh got confused..... got it. I guess so... I've submitted the README but no word, and no other complaints/suggestions, as we've found little else to mess with (or additions/removals) so in a couple days I'll standby, and then get it uploaded.
  23. Last time I checked since Dave started the topic
  24. SidDogg, this is pretty much what I can do within the limits.
  25. Really????? Whoah I never knew! Anyways, it was taken while I was trying to midair refuel and it was just a nice shot Thanks for the observation which has nothing to do with the shot!
×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..

  I accept