MigBuster

Can't see the Like names anymore since the update in the bottom right hand corner of posts - both in IE 10 and Chrome - Is that just me?

I can see them again - cheers Erik

If you mean - another variant - make a copy of the Yak-38 folder and rename it to Yak-38M or whatever then just rename the ini file in it to Yak-38M.ini You wont be able to modify the model but will be able to extract the files to alter the Flight model, loadouts, and Avionics etc

Had cleared the cache on both and restarted - no difference - have tried a different skin and checked to see if any options changed this. What browser are you using ?

Looking at this - it might be best to just use the search function SF2_Structure1.pdf

File Name: Nimitz Class Carrier (CVN-68) File Submitter: MigBuster File Submitted: 07 June 2013 File Category: Improved Skins for Ships Nimitz Class Carrier (CVN-68) ------------------------- Set of alternative textures for the Thirdwire Nimitz Class carrier that came with (SF2NA) Includes a Light Grey and Dark Grey deck scheme USS Nimitz (CVN-68) 1975 - USS Dwight D. Eisenhower (CVN-69) 1977 - USS Carl Vinson (CVN-70) 1982 - USS Theodore Roosevelt (CVN-71) 1986 - USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN-72) 1989 - USS George Washington (CVN-73) 1992 - USS John C. Stennis (CVN-74) 1995 - USS Harry S. Truman (CVN-75) 1998 - USS Ronald Reagan (CVN-76) 2003 - USS George H. Bush (CVN-77) 2009 - Click here to download this file

Run the game then exit Make sure you are looking here C:\Users\[Name]\Saved Games\ThirdWire\StrikeFighters2 [Version] - and NOT in Program Files where the game is installed because they are different!

**** - had no idea - will PM him a message

Seem to remember this caused some major problems last time - is anyone volunteering to help sort this out btw ?

Interesting and useful for all manned aircraft

Could have been - as they say the difficult bit comes with not interfering with the pilot during flying the thing .Guess they might have had to wait for more CPU power/ memory to implement it properly.

So sorry for your loss Todd - condolences.

US Spitfire over Berlin - fantastic short film posted recently! http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=ie3SrjLlcUY

Hunter 59/70/73

er - I assume Herbie was all that was left of the program

Expect it provides more lift and lowers the wing loading a little - and as far as I know the F-104 is the only design that benefits from this

You could guess that a global change has been made to variables affecting the environment or flight models.

Freeze problem - have you deleted in stock jets from the mod folders? If you cut and paste out the mod folder for SF2NA only and run the game to create a new folder does it run okay? Keys problem - one patch had a keys problem like that that TK had to patch (check the TW forums or patch readmes) - suggest patching to the newest patch maybe

Could try adjusting: ShockStroke=0.25 SpringFactor=2.5 DampingFactor=1.8

The Navy had no problems declaring all the other ships that were sunk/hit - and Invincible wasn't even the flagship (that was HMS Hermes) - so all the available evidence suggests conspiracy theory only I'm afraid - and wishful thinking from the fog of war.

When you say "agile" - it probably had a good roll rate with those small wings and small body - and in the vertical was probably comparable top other jets of the era like the F-4 Mirage 3 or MiG-21. As far as horizontal turns go - Andy Bush tells us that it could turn okay at high speed with maneuver flaps - but at other speeds out of that high speed range then maybe not as good. I would expect the MiG-21F-13 to be better in the Horizontal at lower speeds (proved to be very good in Constant Peg) based on a bigger wing area and lower wing loading. It was very fast on the deck as well as up high No Buffet at max turns (any buffet means back off) Moves Andy performed at Top Gun consisted of keeping a high energy state with lots of burner and probably G. A 1975 EM diagram for the F-104C I have suggests a 15 deg max turn rate at ~480KCAS (Alt = 5,000ft, 2 x AIM-9E, weight =18,457LBS). Another pilot (walt BJ) claims the corner speed was on par with the F-4 with takeoff flaps. When Andy describes the turns it seems a lot of effort needs to be put in to fly it to get the best out of it - now when I last flew the AI only TW F-104G it was easy to take off (almost by itself), fly and I seemed to be able to turn in the horizontal with the MiG-17 at lower speeds - so if its anything like that then I would say the old Modded F-104s are far more accurate.

This happens with every engagement - or just AI only ones? Are the AI flyers at a high level? are they bingo fuel? tbh the AI almost always detect a missile launch at their six and break up when I fly