MigBuster

Well - its no surprise:

There are some gorgeous girls in Britain alright - they werent born here though. Went out with a Slovakian girl a few years back - she put British girls to shame in looks, personality, morals, intelligence - of course she was too good for me haha

Decals no longer go in the skin folder - read section 1 and 2 here which should apply http://forum.combatace.com/topic/44026-converting-older-planes-to-work-in-sf2-a-basic-guide-by-migbuster/

haha - nice one

Looks like Asylum films have produced quite a lot of straight (~31) to DVD movies like the above - imagine if they had instead tried to make a few good ones! That giant Claw is too funny btw

some principles are here if you are still not sure http://forum.combatace.com/topic/44798-adding-aircraft-to-campaigns-in-sf2/

I'm on Win 7 64 bit - might be your graphics settings in game - are they set to high or unlimited?

so you see no explosion effects? Check your graphics settings Whats the graphics card/drivers and OS?

what the stores in the hanger selection screen??

as above but theres one here: http://forum.combatace.com/topic/44033-putting-pilots-and-ejection-seats-in-sf2-by-migbuster/

Desert Storm is currently for Wings Over Europe only - You might be able to the terrain from it in SF2E with a bit of tweaking.

Could be loads of things - a few on here might help http://forum.combatace.com/topic/44026-converting-older-planes-to-work-in-sf2-a-basic-guide-by-migbuster/

Fokker Falcon

A great read - many thanks for doing the Interview Bob and posting those exceptional photos

No actually - Most films ive seen have surprised me with plot lines and twists - although I certainly dont care to analyse story lines of films I just turn up to be entertained. So when I blatently notice it and it spoils my enjoyment of the film thats when its **** - and has me hoping the planet gets nuked at the end and the bad guys win - which pi**ed me off even more as the tree hugging smurfs won out

Nah although there are those kinds of people I have to agree with Flashy on this one - I also felt it was the 3D that made the film stand out. For us older folks weve kinda seen it all before - and although I'm no movie buff I could predict the whole story in the first 5 mins, you had pretty much all the same characters youve had in so many other similar type films - so effects were amazing, the film was good overall - but in 2D it wouldnt be half as good.

Not exactly a new concept by any means - just lacking the infrastructure over this way to do it - but maybe in the future I can subscibe to online gam...actully no I wont ****ing be doing that at all!. At the moment id much rather pay my one off fee, download it for 10 mins (not hours), and play it safe in the knowledge that everyone else on my shared link wont decide to log on at that time making it unplayable - which is currently the case.

Which game have you put the above in? - I would assume it goes in WOV as it needs the vietnamsea map. Also assume you have installed the A-7E_MF (Mirage Factory)? As for it not appearing - it should just appear in the custom single mission page with the others. The mission should be a .msn file and needs to be in the missions folder

Also note that the 1978 F-4E probably has leading edge slats - which means it should turn better than the earlier unslatted F-4E versions (i.e. 68/72)

Happy Birthday to you

Is this supposed to be in the Falcon 4 forum? In Falcon 4 AF planes often land and then taxi to a parking space, where they sit for a time period until the game removes them - cant say I have sat and timed them. but yeah if this in the SF series then what FB said above

All the best

Sorry - didnt realise it was the time of year that the overpaid muppets get to pat themselves on the back for making some more mediocre films. Who got the award for most convincing tears - it wasnt the table leg again was it?

Well funny his conclusions always seem to be utter **** just like the papers he sticks on his website. The examples of Flanker Vs F-35 are some of the funniest things ive read - they are so out that these so called experts either dont know much about modern air combat - or have some other motives. Kopp calls himself a Doctor, but puts references in the papers to other papers written by himself - sorry but wtf!! Mainly because 90% of what he states (written as fact) has no evidence to back it up - or in the case of the F-35 and T-50 are not even in service yet. Look at the anaylis of the T-50 - I mean thats pretty impressive he can determine that capability from a few pics of a prototype. I understand that on paper the F-22 would be a better airframe than the F-35 in terms of stealth, range, and power - some things that are pretty important to an Island like Australia - but not moved that the F-35 (soon to be the worlds most advanced jet) is that bad a choice in reality. As far as the Vulcan Vs Tornado goes I'm glad they lost that debate, The Vulcan was designed as a long range high altitude bomber and was massive - the Tornado is a low level striker, faster, smaller and still had the range to hit its cold war targets better than the Vulcan could - IMO the Tornado fitted the low level strike role better.

Thanks for the heads up