Jump to content

Stary

+MODDER
  • Content count

    8,481
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    99

Everything posted by Stary

  1. Typhoid!

    Happy Birthday Typhoid! Cheers! :drinks:
  2. FC2 and LOMAC to run FC3? Quite odd... I do realize they don't have rights to certain assets but it's kinda f-up edit: not that I don't have LOMAC and FC2 (I do) but it's strange -that would be module after all
  3. will see, I come from the "the more various moddable titles the better"* part of the world, peace *as long as these are TW titles with DCS level of graphics, I haven't specified my planet I came from
  4. Also please note that it is confirmed not all DCS modules will be of A-10C fidelity -which is excellent news for me because making such detailed addon takes like forever (ask FSX Hornet guys, what it is now, 6 years?) and I don't need that level of complexity for say 3rd party DCS Fagot, Sturmovik, Skyraider, Panther... damn I start to see a pattern here
  5. can be dumbed down (haven't tried) but yeah I concur, something in the line of FC2 (also 3?) and I'm sold Brain, I don't take your posts as jabbing at DCS, I just think we're too evolved as hardware/software goes not to use the technology... in a nice optimized way Only thing about DCS is the amount of time needed to generate 3rd party terrain -from what I understand very similar to TW's "Stutterland engine" (copyright by Stary!)
  6. that would be me :yes: but 1) I want the man to see he's not the only one for his loyal customers 2) giving a s**t about some obvious flaws pointed out for years is getting kinda rude (sic!) 3) he could have alot more customers, even years-long afficionados IF he made few decisions (or didn't made some)
  7. 5000$ PC? Looks similarily to current DCS fidelity level -also I think he'll bake the details into lower poly models from these The "I won't see those blowing by 900 km/f" thingy -if so we'd be still having Falcon 3.0/Mig-29/Hornet 3.0 era objects in every sim, right? I DO like to use other views apart from cockpit one too and when what I see is more and more complex each new title/hardware era the more I feel I'm in the game so to speak. By the way those are excellent models in themselves, imagine them running in complex environment
  8. it's the insane amount of detail that wins for me compared to good old ladies
  9. PB's Tomcat Viewlist

    nowthat's something
  10. there's even new Wikileaks photo of Mr. Obama watching with his "gameplay advisors" alpha-build of new Thirdwire title for mobile market : Draw your own conclusions... Sorry, couldn't resist
  11. good point random thought No.5643 why TK never ever implemented views of fired weapons for all sides, together missile-to-player // missile-to-others ones?
  12. Spec Ops: The Line

    looks interesting that's for sure... and yes I love depressing grim games. Max Payne, OFP:Resistance
  13. I can't recall us discussing missiles behaviour (not to be mistaken with AI handling of BVR for example) in ages...
  14. Veltro's back in business.. I say "welcome back" Funny as I was dritfing around wikipedia few days ago and found XF-108 I never had knowledge of... (yes... that's true ) and now you're showing wips of it -nice coincidence (or conspiracy! ) BTW I very much like the similarities to A-5 in it's fuselage shape (to my untrained eye)
  15. Dunno about Polish variant, never came across one you might ask Czarny900 about doing it (Bartek jesteś tam?)
  16. ini files can allways be tweked (until it's locked...)
  17. to be fair all my flying now is in Jonathan's "extra-suprises movie-based" campaign so take this into account, but still... have yet to see OPFOR make it to the heaters range
  18. must be the new 100% kill ratio TK introduced I have now somewhere around 50-75% in July patch, mostly flying Tomcat with Sparrows
  19. aircraftobject.ini, also since few years can be set by plane in their respective master inis
  20. Sorry guys but I have had enough... The claim that it would cost him "hundreds of thousands of dollars" "modeling different fuze sensors and warhead types" is plain stupid. I don't like being treated like an idiot, and now I fell like I am. By TK. Openly. I am pissed, beware! It's not that I don't give a s**t about fuze modelling, I do TBH, even more about flak burst fragmentation patterns or apparent lack there of, I'm just plain tired of the same "thousands of dollars" excuses I hear again and again since I joined the forums See, I won't call the names (you know who you are guys) but there are few individuals who say -what if TK isn't that good at programming? Such responses are what kills every will do play and mod this series. And I love this series. The lead programmer will induce me schizophrenia I tell you that! //rant off
×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..