Jump to content

Durasoul

JUNIOR MEMBER
  • Content count

    122
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Durasoul


  1. This thread is supposed to be closed but I found that the USAF has its own laser guided version of the Mavericks. What I found could be the AGM-65L:dntknw:

    Original Photo on Wikimedia Commons, A-10

    An_A-10_love_story_130508-F-LR266-795.jp

    Staff Sgt. Christopher Willis [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons

    If you zoom in you could see the marking.. (I could be wrong though:dntknw:)

    AGM-65L_zoom.thumb.jpg.c0e9fcb6aa44970159e1cee78ebdd336.jpg


  2. Screenshots taken while testing out my little idea.

     

    Missiles are the 65Ds from Ravenclaw's great AGM-65 pack, the test plane A-7K by Mirage Factory. For the smoke effect, I borrowed from tiopiloto's Strela-2 MANPAD..

    Several lines in the AGM-65D_data.ini had been changed:

    BoosterStart=0.000000
    BoosterDuration=3.200000
    BoosterAccel=10.017000
    BoosterEffectName=S5
    BoosterSoundName=Strela-2
    BoosterNodeName=
    BoosterPosition=0.000000,-1.280000,0.000000
    SustainerDuration=3.490000
    SustainerAccel=2.170000
    SustainerEffectName=S5
    SustainerSoundName=
    SustainerPosition=0.000000,-1.280000,0.000000

    This results in a nice smoke trail which disappear once the sustainer is burnout. Without the MissileInFlightEffect the Maverick flies clean towards target.

    You may or may not like it depends on personal thoughts. I find it a better gaming experience.

    large.A-7K_MF_0001.JPG.8c8ecd22c41d563391841ca375ca87a1.JPGlarge.A-7K_MF_0002.JPG.1b064905ba381f8dcf5a5fc09280d7f5.JPGlarge.A-7K_MF_0003.JPG.c257ca8debaeea67f63065b0c0ffe32f.JPG

    • Like 2

  3. 3 hours ago, ravenclaw_007 said:

    olive drab motor is most likely a AGM-65D , white motor is a AGM-65B

    Ravenclaw, I have been thinking on this for a while and now I have another idea.

    I could have made mistakes by sorting the missiles according to their colors. Back to the very beginning, the AGM-65D differ from the AGM-65B (not considering the colors) mainly by the IIR seeker that enables a 24/7, all weather attack capabilities, and the warhead has not been changed; the same 57 Kg shape charge warhead. If we follow this logic and we could easily deduce that the conversion of both the 65D and the 65B back to a version that shares the same CCD seeker would produce a version of the same capabilities, therefore both named the AGM-65H. The 65H has two possible original rockets therefore it makes sense for having 2 different looking 65H missiles: One with OD motor, white seeker(65D > 65H) while the other all white(65B > 65H)

    The AGM-65H2 could be new produced missiles, not converted ones.

    Following the same logic I assume the K would have grey motor, white seeker


  4. Thank you very much for the information on the CCD seeker/guidance section upgrade, RC.:smile: People might see me as bit lazy for not researching info. on my own. My thinking is that there are of course lots of information on the internet, yet few of them are really credible. I'd prefer instead ask you guys for my better understanding on stuff I'd like to know about..

    On 2018/12/19 at 12:56 AM, ravenclaw_007 said:

    the CCD seeker section for both versions are the same and named HK-2

    Yes, neglecting the Navy's own upgrade plan on the AGM-65F(to re-seeker to the CCD; thus become the 65J) the Air Force's AGM-65H and K both  have the same CCD seeker. But the marking "HK2" could mean that a further upgraded "Version 2" CCD seeker is in place on both versions of the missile.

    To clarify, I mean 

    1) Olive Drab motor section, Plain White "HK2" seeker section could suggest it as the AGM-65K2 ; bigger 136 Kg penetrating warhead like the K/G2/G/E, further improved 65K

    2) All White motor section, seeker section "HK2" could suggest it as the AGM-65H2 ; original 57Kg blast warhead like the A/B/D/D2/H, further improved 65H

    I found a photo for case 2. upload later.

    Secondly, the missile from my third picture clearly has an opaque seeker like the 65Ds that should not be the CCD seeker:dntknw: What is that model? the 65D2?? don't know

     


  5. I was watching some videos on public domain about the Air Force personnels who help loading weapons for some training sorties.. The Maverick missiles appear to be some newer variants that I haven't seen before (through any media). 

    Funny thing is that they have mixed colors Olive Drab for the motors while some plain White ,some Grey (like the 65F) What are those models ??:dntknw:

    UNKNOWN_MAV_01.jpg

    UNKNOWN_MAV_02.jpg

    UNKNOWN_MAV_03.jpg

    • Like 1

  6. 2 hours ago, Soulfreak said:

    Testing...

     

    img00005.JPG

    Speaking of testing/experimental schemes.. I have some weird feelings(in favor of them) towards them. 

    Maybe I'll make some flight test skins for my favourite aircrafts after I've learnt how to make one. In the meantime, mandatory:

    Marine Attack Training Squadron 203, stationed in Cherry Point but exercise in the south west..

    large.AV-8B_NA_0004.JPG.506944171e50afea934fbb4be84482fc.JPGlarge.AV-8B_NA_0005.JPG.401f9055dba88d5598a9430ff095c463.JPG

    My imagination of Marines doing SEAD, loadouts could be unrealistic..

    • Like 11

  7. Regarding the recent events in Crimea, the 113 squadron "Gazelle"/"Light" dispatched a Photo recon mission using the ol' trusty Phantom

    Screenies of fantasy: RF-4Es from Eskisehir to Crimea and back, 1434 km

    large.RF-4E_0002.JPG.bdc29ccfa2425747e1455233af1893b3.JPG

    large.RF-4E_0003.JPG.04ddd3e0e71204ffdd46b52c2212a05b.JPGlarge.RF-4E_0005.JPG.cc1af7f061496c313f9917c8f8729928.JPGlarge.RF-4E_0006.JPG.4046f0d86df87565730e85733904466c.JPG

    Thank you all who contributed to this mod. I enjoy the Recce Phantom very much(you can see me playing around with the "Super size flashbang" ).

    I'm sorry guys I'm not aware if there's a Crimea map for SF2. I used the NA map for its good looking water.


  8. I am not sure about the exact model of the MiG-31s that are involved in the incident. I think a safe guess would be a variant of at least having MiG-31BM-equivalent standards. If that's the case I don't understand why the entire flight of 4 MiGs that EACH had used up a typical mission load of internal fuel  of 13,700 litres of jet fuel without anyone noticing sth were wrong...

    31BM has some reasonably good avionics; Even the 1st Gen planes have fuel indications like the Mirage F1s, 2000s. tiles for empty tanks would light up.

    Note MiG-29 like fuel gauge

    MiG-31BM.thumb.jpg.f4fd9ed4b3699548a7804c7336aef9fc.jpg

    • Thanks 1

  9. @guuruu

    MATRA/BAe Dynamics ALARM

    • MATRA/BAe Dynamics won a contract for 750 missiles in 1983
    • Originally, delivery was scheduled in 1986 but Unfortunately the development of the "Nuthatch" rocket motor (missile's engine) ran into problems.. results in delay
    • Later undergone testes in USN Naval Weapons Center at China Lake using modified Red Top AAM Missile Motor(Yes, guidance & mission control units were the whole point at that time)
    • in 1987, German firm MBB/Bayern Chemie and later LFK designed a new rocket motor for the ALARM
    • in 1990, the weapon was certified at China Lake
    • in JAN 1991, operational on RAF Tornado GR Mk.1(in most cases, 3 missiles were carried under the belly; although later a typical load was 3 under belly 2 on INNER wing pylons(both facing outwards)

    Specs:

    Length       4240 mm

    Diameter   230 mm

    Weight       268 Kg(although weight should be in Newton, anyway)

    Range(High alt launch)  Brochure: 58 miles; 93 km/ 28 miles; 45 km (depends on source data)

     

    Hope that helps

    • Like 2
×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..