Canadair Posted February 17, 2008 Posted February 17, 2008 (edited) A while ago I posted this: http://forum.combatace.com/index.php?autoc...p;showfile=4856 Which I use also in WOV terrain; the files contains gundata modifications in order to have more effective flak (i.e. dangerous puffs of smoke which will destroy you, or damage you, and not just explode there for the show) The warhead weights value where upped according a formula I had made, based on various topics here and on 3rd wire forums,, and that I can't find again,, (it happens after 6 months away from home). And yesterday evening I got blown up several times over SEA and last time in a phantom at 20000 ft; I guess I overrated the ks-30 gun. I lowered the value (to 500000) and will exepriment again On the other hand, seeing a more realistic flak a benefit for all and in the hope to widen to experiments numbers and researches, would it be reasonable to make this a sticky, along the lines of the soviet AA missile one? My modded file could be starting point, not because is perfect, but because I experimented with it.. what do you think? Edited February 18, 2008 by Canadair Quote
+Gepard Posted February 18, 2008 Posted February 18, 2008 Heavy flak use Schrappnell (sorry dont know the english term). Would be nice if we would have such warhead. But the increasing the explosive warhead may be a good starting point for improving Flak efficency. Quote
Canadair Posted February 18, 2008 Author Posted February 18, 2008 Heavy flak use Schrappnell (sorry dont know the english term). Would be nice if we would have such warhead. But the increasing the explosive warhead may be a good starting point for improving Flak efficency. It is actually a good way. We need experiment to fine tune the values thoguh... Quote
+column5 Posted February 18, 2008 Posted February 18, 2008 dangerous puffs ... which will destroy you Edit: Its puffs now...all good.. :D Quote
Canadair Posted February 18, 2008 Author Posted February 18, 2008 Careful. This is an all-ages forum. Sorry; that you believe it or not, it is a typo. I mean PUFF... oopps I edit , you delete the wrning okei? Quote
+column5 Posted February 18, 2008 Posted February 18, 2008 Sorry; that you believe it or not, it is a typo. I mean PUFF... oopps I edit , you delete the wrning okei? Its OK, I was just messing with you! Beware the dangerous puss! Quote
Aintry Posted February 18, 2008 Posted February 18, 2008 (edited) Heavy flak use Schrappnell (sorry dont know the english term). Just a difference in spelling: "shrapnel". Edited February 18, 2008 by Tristan Quote
Canadair Posted February 19, 2008 Author Posted February 19, 2008 Tristan, your av is a joy, do you know? Quote
Aintry Posted February 19, 2008 Posted February 19, 2008 It's Sheila Shrapnel, aka Frieda Flak. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.