KingAlbert Posted July 3, 2008 Posted July 3, 2008 What's wrong with this plane? You can find the answer on my blog. Or if you just want to see some fancy pictures, scroll a bit lower to some of the shots I took during campaign testing. . . . . . . . . . . . . AS Mission in a RCAF F/A-18 A pair of F-18's en route to the target. A typical CAS load: mavericks and dumb bombs. The office Rifle Unfriendly neighbourhood. Pressing on Last thoughts? Kaboom Guns, guns, guns. Mudmoving Unexpected guest showing the unexpected guest the door Friendlies at the party Going home Quote
Shaolin Posted July 3, 2008 Posted July 3, 2008 (edited) Nice pics (and intresting blog!)... ...but one little comment (to WOU:BC Update 1): The german navy in not called "Kriegsmarine" (at least not since WWII...)! The correct name would be "Marine" (Marine = navy, Krieg = war - so you can guess what "Kriegsmarine" means - i don't think our neighbours would be very pleased with it... ). edit: 1955-1989 it was sometimes called "Bundesmarine" (informal)... Edited July 3, 2008 by Shaolin Quote
Guest Sony Tuckson Posted July 3, 2008 Posted July 3, 2008 (edited) some comments to improve "realism" a bit Only small details, nothing to really worry about but hell, why not? If think that hornets equipped for CAS wouldn't be loaded with AIM-7...they would preferably load some nav/weapons aiming pods Second very disturbing detail (for me as I was on base during that campaign period ;-) ); any air to air duty for a belgian F-16 would have been assigned to a 1 wing (349 or 350 sqn) block 10 bird Kleine brogel's 10 Wing was only trained for mud moving missions back then. And althoug it's not often the case, the 6 sidewinder config exists and does from time to time show...but in 1989, no AIM-9L for Belgium, only P and N Edited July 3, 2008 by Sony Tuckson Quote
KingAlbert Posted July 3, 2008 Author Posted July 3, 2008 (edited) some comments to improve "realism" a bit Only small details, nothing to really worry about but hell, why not? If think that hornets equipped for CAS wouldn't be loaded with AIM-7...they would preferably load some nav/weapons aiming pods Second very disturbing detail (for me as I was on base during that campaign period ;-) ); any air to air duty for a belgian F-16 would have been assigned to a 1 wing (349 or 350 sqn) block 10 bird Kleine brogel's 10 Wing was only trained for mud moving missions back then. And althoug it's not often the case, the 6 sidewinder config exists and does from time to time show...but in 1989, no AIM-9L for Belgium, only P and N thanks for the feedback That's exactly the kind of response I expect and need. I know something about aircraft, but I lack the day to day useage knowledge. With this kind of feedback I can edit the campaign to reflect reality as much as possible. Any suggestion is more then welcome Edited July 3, 2008 by KingAlbert Quote
+Dave Posted July 4, 2008 Posted July 4, 2008 Also the NAW A-10 was going to be used for Fast FAC and CAS. So its quite at home in the FAC role... Quote
Guest Sony Tuckson Posted July 4, 2008 Posted July 4, 2008 Als ik u kan helpen.... ik was luchtverkeersleiderin 1989, te Beauvechain, dus ik heb tamelijk goed kennis van eenheden van toen Quote
Guest Sony Tuckson Posted July 5, 2008 Posted July 5, 2008 a badge proudly worn by pilots by then the sister squadron was 350, with red as main colour see how double meant the "no reds in belgian blue" was ;-) Quote
tflash Posted July 5, 2008 Posted July 5, 2008 Nice blog, KingAlbert! I see you also make Lomac movies. You should also consider making a movie from your WOE campaign. It takes some tweeking, but you can disable all screen info and messages to have a clean look, as you obviously already did for your screenshots. Quote
Silverbolt Posted July 5, 2008 Posted July 5, 2008 a badge proudly worn by pilots by then the sister squadron was 350, with red as main colour see how double meant the "no reds in belgian blue" was ;-) o/ i think it was reffering to "VVS" btw, i like you SpitFalcon scheme xD i got a photo of it somewhere here.... Quote
Guest Sony Tuckson Posted July 5, 2008 Posted July 5, 2008 that's the big advantage they put one "motto" having a double meaning Quote
+littlesmoke Posted August 1, 2008 Posted August 1, 2008 (edited) Edited August 1, 2008 by littlesmoke Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.