krgf15 Posted October 4, 2008 Posted October 4, 2008 Am I wrong in saying that something seems wrong about the stock 105 shape? It seems like the armordave 105 has the better shape, but I could be wrong. Anyone else got any ideas?
+MigBuster Posted October 5, 2008 Posted October 5, 2008 Is it the sort of thing only a Thud lover would notice?
+Armourdave Posted October 5, 2008 Posted October 5, 2008 armordave 105 has the better shape, Excellent choice sir!
WDH Posted October 5, 2008 Posted October 5, 2008 Is it the sort of thing only a Thud lover would notice? Yes..I'm one of those!
eightlein Posted October 6, 2008 Posted October 6, 2008 Excellent choice sir! Agree on most counts. AD, did I miss the fix for the fuel probe and tailhook on the F-105G? They operate at the same time and when closing, the hook stops and closes at a 90 degree angle to the fuselage on the right. Thats if your looking at the plane from the rear. Also, the canopy entries are present, but no workie. Thanks.
krgf15 Posted October 6, 2008 Author Posted October 6, 2008 Well awhile back i gained a mystical power which allows me to physically participate in video games. I climbed into WOV with precision measuring instruments and recently declassified blue prints of the F-105. Upon examination both aircraft were off by +/- 0.015 thousandths of an inch. Sorry to disappoint but they're both wrong. LMAO!!!!
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now