MiG-29UB?

[+SidDogg 130]

... Does anybody have one available?

[Signum 0]

I don't suppose.

Maybe MirageFactoryTeam works on it, but i'm not sure.

Edited December 19, 2008 by Signum

[Silverbolt 104]

nope, i haven't heard any news of it....

the twin seater master here is Amoflook, maybe you should ask him if he had plains to make one...

[+SidDogg 130]

....hokely dokely.

[+Florian 394]

nope, i haven't heard any news of it....

the twin seater master here is Amoflook, maybe you should ask him if he had plains to make one...

But not on high priority list...

 

[az12121 0]

But not on high priority list...

WOW!!!

Very nice model!

What's on your high priority list?

[+Florian 394]

WOW!!!

Very nice model!

What's on your high priority list?

The Hawk 200 series, new air bases for the GermanyCE terrain and some surprises.

[+Viggen 525]

MiG-29UB, fun! Not the best MiG-29 to go into combat with, but a nice aircraft.

 

This has lots of potential paint schemes. Keep it up!

[kct 5]

In during myself saying OUR MiG-29NUBs.

 

Only two of these guys though.

[Silverbolt 104]

Damn, i didn't know that, but as i said...Amoflook is the first word when you think 2 seaters

 

lol

xD

btw, very nice Fulcrum!

[+Gepard 10,690]

The UB is only a trainer. No real radar. Not good for combat.

But the MiG-29M2 strike plane double seater would be a very welcome addition.

[Silverbolt 104]

The UB is only a trainer. No real radar. Not good for combat.

But the MiG-29M2 strike plane double seater would be a very welcome addition.

 

There is an MiG-35 too and i call it a real combat machine

[az12121 0]

The UB is only a trainer. No real radar. Not good for combat.

But the MiG-29M2 strike plane double seater would be a very welcome addition.

It have simply radiolocator, and it can carry only IR guidance missles.

But it's more than MiG-21...

MiG-29UBT will be simplier to make-only modify existing model.

It have Kopyo radar and can carry R-77, and probably R-27.

Edited December 20, 2008 by az12121