Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

As a side project, I've been working on CGN-25 USS Bainbridge, a cold war era nuclear-powered cruiser. She served all the way up until the Gulf War!

I'm doing this ship as a request from colmack, who provided me with the original model. I have something of a cruiser fetish, so saying no wasn't an option. grin.gif

 

Mostly I did a clean up, rescaling, replacing/modifying some objects, adding all the weapons, doing the uvw and textures, and ini work. I tried replicating JB5's skinning style, and I think it's coming out pretty well. (Still need to do some work on the deck.) I have one sticking point, though, and that's the railings.

 

This is what I want it to look like:

post-33721-0-45842300-1309345421.jpg

 

But THIS is what it looks like in SF2:

post-33721-0-67642100-1309345430.jpg

 

See, this is why I don't bother doing railings on my ships...

 

Anyway, the objects are simple rectangular polygons with a wireframe material assigned, which seemed like a great idea to me and it looks good in render. But obviously it's not working in-game. I'd rather not rebuild them from scratch. Is there a quick/easy way to get them looking right?

Posted

Hey the tga is the right way to obtain railings in low res..................see the fwd antenna of the Iowa_Class80s its a mix of 3D and tga on plane meshes....

 

Mauz.

Posted

for railings i just draw lines, set them to 3 sides, and a really small thickness (not at my studio system so i cant tell you what thickness i use), apply black or grey material and link it to the parent Mesh.

  • 2 months later...
Posted (edited)

Very nice :good:

 

A tip, if you don't mind: try bump-mapping your models....it make's quite a difference in the model's appearance under DX10.

Edited by Fubar512
Posted

Very nice :good:

 

A tip, if you don't mind: try bump-mapping your models....it make's quite a difference in the model's appearance under DX10.

 

Okay, I'll try. To be honest my computer is pushing 5 years old and my graphics card doesn't seem to support many DX10 features, so I'm not sure if I'll even notice it on my end.

Maybe I'll have to get someone with a more modern rig to take the screenshots for me. grin.gif

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

I've been experimenting with bump mapping. I've decided that the payoff-to-effort ratio is pretty good, so all my ships will be getting updates with bump maps. It's too bad I can't see it in-game on my own computer, but the renders look nice.

 

Here's the Leahy:

gallery_33721_313_37242.jpg

...I also fixed an issue with the railings on this ship and the Bainbridge.

 

For a more dramatic example, here's the USS Freedom:

gallery_33721_313_33843.jpg

 

 

A few questions on this process: Can I get away with using a smaller (lower resolution) bitmap? For example, a 1024x1024 map for a 2048x2048 texture? I'd like to save RAM and hard drive space for anyone who downloads my stuff, as long as quality isn't sacrificed too much. Also, is it possible to use a compressed image format (jpeg? png?) for the bump map instead?

Posted (edited)

 

A few questions on this process: Can I get away with using a smaller (lower resolution) bitmap? For example, a 1024x1024 map for a 2048x2048 texture? I'd like to save RAM and hard drive space for anyone who downloads my stuff, as long as quality isn't sacrificed too much. Also, is it possible to use a compressed image format (jpeg? png?) for the bump map instead?

 

Multiple textures and bumpmaps are the way to go. For example, while 6 1024x1024 textures and bumpmaps may total up to more than a single 2048 x 2048, they have less of an impact on systems resources than the single, higher resolution texure/bumpmap!

Edited by Fubar512
Posted

Multiple textures and bumpmaps are the way to go. For example, while 6 1024x1024 textures and bumpmaps may total up to more than a single 2048 x 2048, they have less of an impact on systems resources than the single, higher resolution texure/bumpmap!

 

Huh. I wish I had known that sooner! I'll try using multiple smaller textures if/when I do an aircraft.

 

 

What I wanted to know about bump maps specifically is if I can have a bump map file that's smaller than the model's texture file? i.e. a 1024 texture with a 512 bump map? I tried it and it looks okay in render, but I don't know how it will look in-game.

Posted

Huh. I wish I had known that sooner! I'll try using multiple smaller textures if/when I do an aircraft.

 

 

What I wanted to know about bump maps specifically is if I can have a bump map file that's smaller than the model's texture file? i.e. a 1024 texture with a 512 bump map? I tried it and it looks okay in render, but I don't know how it will look in-game.

 

They should match, as any issues caused by reducing resolution on the bumpmaps versus the texture files will be all too obvious, especially on lines that "wrap" around corners or radiuses.

Posted

They should match, as any issues caused by reducing resolution on the bumpmaps versus the texture files will be all too obvious, especially on lines that "wrap" around corners or radiuses.

 

Got it, thanks.

 

I'll be posting updates of these ships soon, so hopefully the bump mapping will be a noticeable improvement for some of you. I may also try using .DDS textures once I get the proper plugin and image converter installed.

 

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..