colmack 662 Posted March 28, 2013 I just thought it was kool Real-time simulating ocean waves by GeForce GTX Titan 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Wrench 9,876 Posted March 28, 2013 holy crap!!!! unbelievable!!! not THATs simming! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
+JonathanRL 974 Posted March 28, 2013 not THATs simming! Is it Swimming then? :P Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
+whiteknight06604 935 Posted March 28, 2013 Is it Swimming then? :P well played sir... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JediMaster 451 Posted March 28, 2013 Yeah, so 100% of your resources are devoted to the waves...so what about DOING something other than watching it? If it's not part of a believable world you can interact with and do things in, it's just a movie where you control the camera. In other words, it's a sim where all you can do is watch the boat GO. I'm sure that's no Ship Simulator 2012 there with realistic ship systems modeling and it's certainly not Dangerous Waters II with sonar performance amidst thermal layers. So while this is nice to look at, we still need a lot more work. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
+Brain32 265 Posted March 28, 2013 Not just nice too look at, expensive to look out too, check the prices of TITAN and ofcourse you ain't gonna slap it on 486DX2, you will need a good INTEL cpu and tons of DDR3 memory... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Wrench 9,876 Posted March 28, 2013 misspelling...should be "now" I must learn how to type... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
UK_Widowmaker 571 Posted March 28, 2013 It'll be like this soon Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
+Typhoid 231 Posted March 29, 2013 not so good. The spray from the bow of the ship coming down is considerably under done when compared to the funnel smoke. about a B minus. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JediMaster 451 Posted March 29, 2013 That's because I'm sure the smoke shaders and the water shaders don't have the same values for the wind, or if they do they merely use it in a different way like one uses "15" as kts and the other as kmh. I'm fairly sure the same guy didn't program both. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
+Typhoid 231 Posted March 29, 2013 That makes sense. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
