dsawan Posted January 22, 2015 Posted January 22, 2015 Agree! a must have. Like your sig change btw. 4;24 looks nice! Quote
EricJ Posted January 23, 2015 Posted January 23, 2015 My sig? Thanks! It does look awesome really, the sun effects on the ramp is one of things that sold me, looks real as hell. Quote
Centurion-1 Posted January 23, 2015 Posted January 23, 2015 Must say the DCS 2.0 gfx engine is really up to it, looks incredibly nice. I can imagine that the 3rd party terrain market will see a lot of development, because unlike the 3rd party aircraft market you don't need to be an aerospace engineer, you just need to put in a lot of time fleshing out the area. Wonder what the satmap and heightmap resolution is, it looks to be pretty darn good in anycase, esp. heightmap. Quote
Milktrout Posted January 23, 2015 Posted January 23, 2015 Wait until you guys see Strike Fighters 3. Quote
JediMaster Posted January 26, 2015 Posted January 26, 2015 Yeah, this looks so great, I'm just worn out now waiting for it. 2 Quote
EricJ Posted January 27, 2015 Posted January 27, 2015 In two years right? Yeah unless it redefines simming I may look into it, but overall things have to REALLY change for me to be interested. I keep SF2 on my HD to help out people but overall I'm kinda stuck in an Arma 3 fix for now. Quote
FastCargo Posted January 27, 2015 Posted January 27, 2015 Also, how hard will it be to make terrains? If it's insanely difficult, there may not be a proliferation of such. I hope there is a happy medium somewhere. FC Quote
EricJ Posted January 27, 2015 Posted January 27, 2015 (edited) Amen to that, Nevada has been discussed for years. Arma 3 mapmakers take on average a month or more and they're very good quality maps indeed. Granted yes, the scale is totally different from what we're used to in DCS but overall if it takes this long to get a map I'll be able to legally retire when another map rolls out. Edited January 27, 2015 by EricJ Quote
+SiThSpAwN Posted January 28, 2015 Posted January 28, 2015 Amen to that, Nevada has been discussed for years. Arma 3 mapmakers take on average a month or more and they're very good quality maps indeed. Granted yes, the scale is totally different from what we're used to in DCS but overall if it takes this long to get a map I'll be able to legally retire when another map rolls out. Maps should start moving faster once they have gotten the creation tools and how to merge them with DCS World down, I think the complexity is much greater than Arma 3, but certainly we arent going to see 3-4 year delays on maps, unless they decide to redo the engine with each new map... It really doesnt make much sense to judge development time of a map based on what we are going through right now. 1 Quote
EricJ Posted January 28, 2015 Posted January 28, 2015 (edited) Given back then to now? No sorry, you're not going to convince me otherwise. That's just fact man, it's been around for a lot longer before you showed up on the ED team that's for sure. If you check my profile on the ED forums you'll see my join date as Nov 2004 (when i was in Iraq and the boards moved from Ubi's to the current iteration) so no man, while I understand the development cycle before I disappeared a few years ago doesn't change my opinion. Edited January 28, 2015 by EricJ Quote
+SiThSpAwN Posted January 28, 2015 Posted January 28, 2015 (edited) Well everyone is entitled to their own opinion of course... nothing really exists from when you were a Tester, the Nevada map was re-rebuilt just a couple years ago, but anyways, I am not trying to convince you of anything, just stating my opinion. Everyone gets to believe what they like. Edited January 28, 2015 by SiThSpAwN Quote
EricJ Posted January 28, 2015 Posted January 28, 2015 (edited) Yep and still it took years to finish. Thanks for your insight though, I'm sure it'll be appreciated somewhere else. Edited January 28, 2015 by EricJ Quote
+SiThSpAwN Posted January 28, 2015 Posted January 28, 2015 Yep and still it took years to finish. Thanks for your insight though, I'm sure it'll be appreciated somewhere else. Sorry for having a differing opinion from yours, I'll try to be better in the future... Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.