Spinners Posted February 8, 2023 Posted February 8, 2023 McDonnell Douglas Phantom FGR.3 - No.6 Squadron, RAF Strike Command, 1972 10 Quote
Mike Dora Posted February 12, 2023 Posted February 12, 2023 Nice again, Spinners. That would have given the RAF faster Phantoms than its actual Spey-powered FG1’s and FGR2’s, at about 2/3 the price! Fitting the “fatter”, more powerful Spey (turbofan vs the turbojet J79), with its bigger intakes, not only led to increased intake drag but also messed with the F-4’s fuselage area ruling. As well as costing a lot more. So while our Phantoms could accelerate faster than a standard J79-powered ac, and had greater endurance, they couldn’t fly as fast. As proved when 74 Sqn was equipped with the second-hand J79-powered F-4J(UK)* in the 1980’s. *That clumsy designation always irritated. Being employed in the pure fighter role, the F-4J(UK) should logically have been designated the Phantom F3. 1 Quote
Wrench Posted February 12, 2023 Posted February 12, 2023 Quote As proved when 74 Sqn was equipped with the second-hand J79-powered F-4J(UK)* in the 1980’s. I did those back in 2011 -- they should still be in the downloads section, someplace!!! Quote
Spinners Posted February 12, 2023 Author Posted February 12, 2023 Regarding costs, the Osprey book on the British Phantoms states that a Spey Phantom was 2.5 times the cost of an F-4D. 2 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.