Spinners Posted February 8, 2023 Posted February 8, 2023 McDonnell Douglas Phantom FGR.3 - No.6 Squadron, RAF Strike Command, 1972 10
Mike Dora Posted February 12, 2023 Posted February 12, 2023 Nice again, Spinners. That would have given the RAF faster Phantoms than its actual Spey-powered FG1’s and FGR2’s, at about 2/3 the price! Fitting the “fatter”, more powerful Spey (turbofan vs the turbojet J79), with its bigger intakes, not only led to increased intake drag but also messed with the F-4’s fuselage area ruling. As well as costing a lot more. So while our Phantoms could accelerate faster than a standard J79-powered ac, and had greater endurance, they couldn’t fly as fast. As proved when 74 Sqn was equipped with the second-hand J79-powered F-4J(UK)* in the 1980’s. *That clumsy designation always irritated. Being employed in the pure fighter role, the F-4J(UK) should logically have been designated the Phantom F3. 1
+Wrench Posted February 12, 2023 Posted February 12, 2023 Quote As proved when 74 Sqn was equipped with the second-hand J79-powered F-4J(UK)* in the 1980’s. I did those back in 2011 -- they should still be in the downloads section, someplace!!!
Spinners Posted February 12, 2023 Author Posted February 12, 2023 Regarding costs, the Osprey book on the British Phantoms states that a Spey Phantom was 2.5 times the cost of an F-4D. 2
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now