Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Nice again, Spinners.

That would have given the RAF faster Phantoms than its actual Spey-powered FG1’s and FGR2’s, at about 2/3 the price!

Fitting the “fatter”, more powerful Spey (turbofan vs the turbojet J79), with its bigger intakes,  not only led to increased intake drag but also messed with the F-4’s fuselage area ruling. As well as costing a lot more.

So while our Phantoms could accelerate faster than a standard J79-powered ac, and had greater endurance, they couldn’t fly as fast. As proved when 74 Sqn was equipped with the second-hand J79-powered F-4J(UK)* in the 1980’s.

 

*That clumsy designation always irritated. Being employed in the pure fighter role, the F-4J(UK) should logically have been designated the Phantom F3.

  • Like 1
Posted
Quote

As proved when 74 Sqn was equipped with the second-hand J79-powered F-4J(UK)* in the 1980’s.

I did those back in 2011 -- they should still be in the downloads section, someplace!!!

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..