Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Nice again, Spinners.

That would have given the RAF faster Phantoms than its actual Spey-powered FG1’s and FGR2’s, at about 2/3 the price!

Fitting the “fatter”, more powerful Spey (turbofan vs the turbojet J79), with its bigger intakes,  not only led to increased intake drag but also messed with the F-4’s fuselage area ruling. As well as costing a lot more.

So while our Phantoms could accelerate faster than a standard J79-powered ac, and had greater endurance, they couldn’t fly as fast. As proved when 74 Sqn was equipped with the second-hand J79-powered F-4J(UK)* in the 1980’s.

 

*That clumsy designation always irritated. Being employed in the pure fighter role, the F-4J(UK) should logically have been designated the Phantom F3.

  • Like 1
Posted
Quote

As proved when 74 Sqn was equipped with the second-hand J79-powered F-4J(UK)* in the 1980’s.

I did those back in 2011 -- they should still be in the downloads section, someplace!!!

Posted

Regarding costs, the Osprey book on the British Phantoms states that a Spey Phantom was 2.5 times the cost of an F-4D. 

  • Confused 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..