Time to improve the old SF2 jets

[+daddyairplanes 8,710]

4 hours ago, EricJ said:

You spelled 64th wrong...

posted from phone while doing laundry

you know,  i understand some of the things ducking autocorrect does. but after the latest update my phone loves to swap numbers around,  and the forced corrections seem to be getting more arbitrary. but the numbers bit really baffles me

[+EricJ 3,944]

2 minutes ago, daddyairplanes said:

posted from phone while doing laundry

you know,  i understand some of the things ducking autocorrect does. but after the latest update my phone loves to swap numbers around,  and the forced corrections seem to be getting more arbitrary. but the numbers bit really baffles me

Ahh gotcha

[+GKABS 8,346]

update

[+yakarov79 10,540]

On 4/19/2024 at 3:13 AM, daddyairplanes said:

i've seen things that said it could, but have never heard of it actually carrying them

for that matter, being the fleets heavy striker, you rarely see rocket pod on them (although i have seen pics of that)

I knew I got it somewhere in my 'database'

although here on early E somewhere '76-78

help here - what do you see 152928 or 152929  vertical stabilizer?

while rocket pods were quite common on land-based Marine tadpoles in Vietnam.

 

 

[+daddyairplanes 8,710]

i see 29,  but other eyes and screens may see different. that one is a b... of a pic

and the Marines would carry them in Nam, but they also ran a much different mission than the Navy at the time. frankly, im surprised theres tanks on the one in your pic rather than more ordinance