Jump to content

Wrench

ADMINISTRATOR
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content count

    26,944

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    133

Everything posted by Wrench

  1. apparently, none. What I've been able to discover, is it's an aircraft issue. Mainly, Exported=TRUE. And... the game seemingly ignores the userlist ini, making it well, useless. an example, below as to 'being British', I assume you're flying later than the date the RAN switched from British roundels to the 'roo roundel?
  2. This post cannot be displayed because it is in a password protected forum. Enter Password
  3. they're openable, and extracable. The programer just won't release that tool until a uncontrivertible (irrevocable?) "YES" is received. Even then, there's still the piracy issue, of LODs (and other internal components) being shared without the purchase of the game (or DLC) modules required for their use
  4. have you checked the spit's cockpit ini for the correct name of the tga?? I know for a fact, all the spit pits I use, and have uploaded should be using the 'RAFMkIII_Gunsight.tga" we haven't used the P38 sight for years on the Spitfires, considering it's the wrong one even for the Lightning
  5. told ya so!!! the TAE is da bomb!!
  6. a new, better terrain engine? (not the lod-based failure one, either)
  7. just copy the gunsight tga from one cockpit folder to the other; that should fix it
  8. iirc, it was only the Pit1 that cast the 'shadow beam'. the other 2 are ok
  9. ok, I see now. The INDIVIDUAL object's ini that would be an awful lot of work, extracting all 100 and something ini, and tweeking them. But it wold definately do the trick, as the individial ini, irrc, can take precedence over the _types entry
  10. This post cannot be displayed because it is in a password protected forum. Enter Password
  11. didn't I do that mod 10 years ago for Gen 1??? Your's looks better, though!
  12. targets ini is just a listing of "where" something is. Could you elaborate on the distance in the targets ini?? totally agree with adjusting the view distance in the _types ini. I know many as set rather close (or not far enough)
  13. you did remember to change the year spans in the Options, ini, too, right?? takes getting used to.. some of us have been doing it for so long, it's almost insticntual; we just do it without thinking about it.
  14. follow all the procedures for creating a seperate/new install, and you MUST have the ww2 nations ini
  15. This post cannot be displayed because it is in a password protected forum. Enter Password
  16. holy crap... man, that's just unbelievable!!
  17. This post cannot be displayed because it is in a password protected forum. Enter Password
  18. for JRL
  19. what I've got is an aircraft with a total fuel capacity of 464 gallons, split between 7 tanks 2 inner wing 2 outer wing (larger tanks) 2 tip tanks 1 fuselage tank (smallest) nothing I've searched out has any information on how much which tank holds. Other than the total this is what I have at the moment (and KNOW is wrong!)
  20. single nation only, with the year spans matching those in the data ini. That's for the "home user" export users year spans have to match the exported start and end years from the data ini for example, in data ini: in userlist ini: so, cannot have the same user with multiple entries with differing service year spans. Only one entry per nation
  21. can any of our Russian speaker help out in making some decals (or even a plain bmp) for me, in proper Cyrillic? I need 3 ship names Borodino Sevastopol Kinburn all caps (or whatever Cyrillic uses). The image should be 256x256, with black lettering on a white background. I've tried using my fonts, but it looks too "american" Many thanks, in advance!!
  22. they look good the boat! (just wish the model was better....)
  23. This post cannot be displayed because it is in a password protected forum. Enter Password
  24. This post cannot be displayed because it is in a password protected forum. Enter Password

  25. 10 Cloverfield Lane

    Wrench replied to MigBuster's topic in The Pub

    isn't it supposed to be a sequel to "Cloverfield"?
×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..

  I accept