Dutch_P47M

You could also try RoF at http://riseofflight.com/ these seems to a limited to try version to test this game out. Believe me WoFF V2 is a great game and indeed the $75,- is absolutely worth it, but a warning for WoFF potential buyers: Be aware that the Microsoft Force Feedback joystick is not supported by WoFF game.

Think you should read this: http://www.overflandersfields.com/Requirements.html

But before maybe he should also upgrade his rig. I still can remember running OFF3 wayback in 2009 on a AMD 6400+ dualcore/4Gb RAM/nVidia7300LE-0.5Gb think WoFF needs lots more now-a-days. .

Could you also do a cleaned up F1 view mode!!!

, Typhoon this is great news.

Why did OBD guys move over to Simhq, a website that is prone to slow downs and "no connection message" problems.

I did try this software on my sons system and I know that this 2007 software, is doing strange things when running more then 4 cores. But suppose you run a 4core system and have selected the 4core checkbox [in options]. You have to set all to manual mode, and make a profile. Now run Woff start a mission [CFS3.exe is starting], go to pause and alt/tab Rest to explain is in the picture, think it is the CFS3.exe that is causing max load not Woff btw.

links are dead, so please delete this topic.

Like what happen in Simhq, think for most readers it is a handy to separate the forum in OFF3 and WoFF subforums.

OK, no problem it is your party. Was only my advice after being a long time away from this forum and notice how unpractical all this is.

You should check the WoFF section at Simhq. Most people do not play OFF3 nor OFF2 etc. so why still combining OFF3/WoFF if the majority is only interested in WoFF??? I know this is not going to bring in, more posters/readers, this is only a handy because most do not have interest in OFF3 anymore and now getting confused. Why do you think the devs did split OFF3 and WoFF at Simhq???? ADVICE: and if going for a WoFF section do use only one and not like for OFF3/WoFF lots of subsections. So I would go for main Over Flanders field like actual, that do have only 3 subsections, containing one WoFF, one OFF3 and one OFF1&2 subsection. Thats means you have to combine every OFF3/WoFF subsection to one and rename it to OFF3.

Hi Seany and Zuza, why not pm Polovski on the Simhq forum and ask him for a Hitr-copy? He must have one.

Wanting to go for WOFF so my OVER FLANDERS FIELDS #3 DVD is for sale, let me now by pm if interested. DVD is only used for a fresh installation on my Harddisk, think it is used two times. OFF3 game was normally starting by a non-CD hack .

Wow first posting done be me, as a WW1 combat flysim it is a honour.

Lets make one thing clear here, do not use any judgement on people who never never played the particular game but still have a opinion on that game. So here I can not do any judgement on FE2 or Combataces, because I never played it , I'm not a fan of FE1 but maybe FE2 could be great. But right now it seems that its going between "OFF3 for CFS3" and RoF-ICE in the poll and I think indeed these are the games to go for. Now how to select between those two games and you only want to spent on one, [as a WW1 sim fan I would get them both]? Lot of opinions on forums like Simhq, RoF and here, going on, so do a search and try to find what you need/like in a game. Do not skip RoF if you want a campaign mode because Pat Wilson [THE RB3d Pat] is still busy in making a RB3d based campaign mode. Personally I'm not a fan of running the game at the minimum PCspec's and RoF needs a big PC to run on a decent level. I'm thinking about something like a Q6700 and a 1Gb Vcard starting from a ATI4850/Nvidia9800GTX+ without this do not even think about RoF. note: why not give the Free ArgonsV WW1-FS a try?

If your have a dualcore setup like I have, you will notice that every update is causing more and more CPU-load. This game is due the last update now only playable for quadcore users, dualcore users can now only play limited and at low settings, so there is no argument to leave your old game and get RoF at the store, because of the low graphic settings this RoF game looks like your old WW1 combatsim, that your playing now. So dualcore users, why leaving your good old, bugfree and stable WW1 fly sim? Did some communication to Neoqb, asking why not using check-boxes to disable some CPU load processes like fluid dynamics or complex FM/DM, but no interest to this point. Wait until Olegs BoB will be published, then they will be forced to act here. But if you are a WW1 flysimmer, have a big quadcore like the i7-920, a decent Vcard then get this game.

I somebody is facing problems regarding creative drivers, then get the alternatives from KXproject, PAX or Daniel_K. First remove the old drivers, use driver remover from 3dguru and then install the alternative ones. PAX and Danial_K are based on creative drivers, KX is difficult but not based on any creative driver source.

Thanks mate

Ok its going to that point!!!!! First of all I'm more a less a collector of WW1 flysims, I'm a WW1 flysim fan. I got FE direct after its release date and it is the same as with the WoW flysim, I did not like this type of game then, maybe things are changed now. That why I have asked is the FE campaign mode improved. Because I am more a campaign mode gamer, not on-line anymore btw, one thing that I like about this great OFF3 game is this splendid campaign mode . For this FE was at the start not that much good mods available, so like WoW [=the flysim] I did the installation, played a couple of times and noticed that this games were not my cup of tea, I did had the feeling these games was more a arcade design. After the FE mods went on to be better, I was already to the OFF scene, ok I did a try after I find out about the mods, but for me sorry FE it was OFF as the main game :yes: . BTW I'm capable in swapping files, sorry but I'm not a idiot

Olham Yep I mean that shooter arcade game: FirstEagles, with that funny rubber boat sound, my children like that!! So my retry: Still no decent campaign mode I suppose???? BTW Shred you seems to be little irritating on my reply, did I something wrong or did I read it wrong here.

Still no decent campaign I suppose on this arcade game?????

and the x58, 790FX, 890FX etc. All could run full CrossfireX so do a search on the mobo's web site or at ATI, if this is important for you. About ATI, even Polovski is running now a HD58??, it is not the Vcard I think, but more a less the adjustments on that crappy CFSconfig file that is causing problems here. What PSU, mobo and CPU do you have because I think 3Gb RAM should be right to run OFF and right now there are some Vcards based on HD4670 and HD4650 GPU that can run on limited power and do have a AGPslot. I do not know if this GPU can run on OFF at a decent graphic adjustment, but if not so, forum members will correct this. But keep in your mind if you like to play a game like RoF get a i7-920, socket1366 mobo, GTX285 or a HD58XX Vcard all to take the full advantage and a trouble free play.

Ok you want a AMD and not the Intel i7/15 setup and no CrossfireX or SLI!!!!! What are you want to play here, if it is only OFF then go for a cheap dualcore system, some $300/500,- complete and get a additional ATI57XX serie Vcard or why not updating you old system. Playing games like RoF then get a: quadcore AMD phenomII X4 965-125Watt CPU and not the 955 mobo socketAM3 & DDR3, do not get the one that have a on-board Vcard like 785G because this will be useless here. Vcard: ATI58XX serie Vcard. Why ATI card and not Nvidia: because they can use the DirectX11, Nvidia only the old directX10, yep we are going for the future. Or go to a site like Tomshardware.com and check what you want by selecting the best components and rankings. Keep in you mind that in my country the i5 socket1156 is about the same price as the AMD-am3 setup.