Jump to content

jeanba

RED TAILS
  • Posts

    3,566
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    19

Everything posted by jeanba

  1. Bad news, it does not work with my install. :(
  2. Lot of framerate drops disappeared, so it looks ok to me
  3. Which conformal flare launcher ? Alkan 5021 ? I can send it to you, just have to add a station. Anyway, it was used only on late F1CR, F1CT and maybe some export versions For the Lacroix, I have to check
  4. Also, will it be possible to replace the Parachute fairing by a Lacroix flare dispenser ? I can change the data.ini, to add a station, but the CAD can be changed in this case for higher accuracy. Once again, all info here : http://www.airvectors.net/avmirf1.html :
  5. I had the same thoughts as Russo, and it scares me too
  6. Don't thank me,thank gillouf : http://www.checksix-forums.com/showthread.php?t=181643
  7. RWR : Load factor indicator is now below (thick red line) The thin red line is the sight angle indicator.
  8. It's a BF so a visual one, like in the Mirage IIIE or french jaguar The small "plane" just right of TV display, very different from US type RWR
  9. Unfortunatly, I am struggling to find one. But its presence is attested in most sources such as this one : http://www.airvectors.net/avmirf1.html
  10. Hello Phimat is only a contraction of Philipps / Matra. As such there are a lot of variants of the Phimat, and its content : I know that for the Super-Etendard, the phimat contained chaffs, it is likely the same thing for the jaguar (from what I udnerstood, the "full" version was too heavy). For the Mirage IVP, it was a combination of flares and chaffs. I don't really know for the Mirage III and 5F. For Mirages F1, I think it was both. For most British and German planes, it was both. All those information being subject to corrections. So I think we need for the 2 or even 3 variants : - 60 chaffs - 120 chaffs - mix Nato5 uses the combination, the Mirage III from Deoliveiraand team use 60 chaffs, they should be differentiated. Thank you in advance
  11. I think you need to add the BF RWR
  12. Very nice In the late version loadout.ini, the strike_78 should be as follows : Anyway, is the AI able to handle the AS30 properly ? Also, the RWR is wrong, should be a "BF" like in the TMF version. I suppose you did this because you cannot position the BF ? [strike_78] StartDefaultDate=1978 DefaultFor=STRIKE,ANTI_SHIP Loadout[01].WeaponType=Barrac1 Loadout[01].Quantity=1 Loadout[02].WeaponType=Phimat Loadout[02].Quantity=1 Loadout[13].WeaponType=AS30 Loadout[13].Quantity=1 Loadout[14].WeaponType=M3E_RP1700 Loadout[14].Quantity=1 Loadout[15].WeaponType=M3E_RP1700 Loadout[15].Quantity=1
  13. Thank you Fubar I will have a look Fo the moment, I am targeting the Ninuchla corvettes, by WB Samurai
  14. I have the same problem But it seems good now
  15. If I can target with "R", then my hit rate is good
  16. It does not work, maybe the ennemy force has not spawned yet ?
  17. Hello I have problems in targeting ennemy ships with Exocet on my super-etendard. I can target them with "R" if they fire sams, visual target at visual range but I would like to target it normally : ie at stand off range, if possible using my radar and without needing sam warning. Can you help me ? Thank you
  18. That's great, it introduces a whole new gameplay. Hope to see it for other planes
  19. jeanba

    img00062

    From the album: Jeanba's album

  20. looks nice An occasion to go back to this nice plane
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..