Jump to content

macelena

ELITE MEMBER
  • Content count

    4,016
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    12

Everything posted by macelena

  1. Hiroo Onoda: Honor or Fanatism? RIP

    Regarding what von baur said, it is not the first time such thing happened in those circumstances, specially in the Philippines. After the Spanish-American war of 1898, the Spanish garrison of Baler, besieged by Moro forces, kept fighting for a year until relieved by the USMC. They didn't know the war was over, and the US Marines kept sending them newspapers the defenders believed fake until one of the officers noticed an announcement of a friend of him being stationed to his own unit.
  2. Another update.

    Hey, they could use that port to give you that thing they did to Bane in the Batman film by George Clooney. I know it was a criminally bad movie, but hey, they had Arnie and Uma Thurman in it
  3. Post random things thread

  4. Post random things thread

  5. I guess Crusaders, even worn out, would have been the option if lacking Hornets. Updating with yet more systems for combat capability and survivavility (ECM, Decoy dispensers, RWR, computer for HUD, new radar, etc) would have burdened them for carrier Ops, just as it had with the A-4Ms. An A-A capable Skyhawk would have been another different variant, with the same issues as the A-4M and less performance. I think something like the French F-8P seems like an obvious solution, if still having been battered, modified Vietnam veteran airframes.
  6. Update of my treatment

    Cheers buddy, kill the fucker
  7. Most awesome man ever. He stood out with his interviews in Dogfights. RIP
  8. Did my scan...

    I read in your case chem is less likely, but Docs may want to gas the bastard as well as nuke it, just to be sure. Either way, you know, the question is "Never quit" until suddenly it is over. Could you do a blog or some kind of diary? I don´t know about others, but it would be easier to know about how things are going if you miss a thread.
  9. Why do birds...........

    Yes, and such method is even more necessary for the birds, however, it seems to be a bit of an overkill as an investigation
  10. Improving the F-16V

    Oops, makes sense
  11. Why do birds...........

    I remember readingin a women´s magazine an anthropologic study about why men hug each other keeping their lower parts of their body apart, calling it an A type hug. They found out that it was to keep distance with each other genitals. I wonder why didn´t they bother asking any random dude. They must be really awkward to men if it is such a groundbreaking discovery. Any guy would have referenced lightsabers or something.
  12. Improving the F-16V

    Su-30MKA low end? I´m kind of a Flankerphobic, so i´m afraid this SOB can stand up to some if not all the high enders.
  13. News of my test results.

    Hold on Falcon!!
  14. Will try to see how to get the paypal issue straight, failed to when that thing of the language packages. Can´t promise anything in my current situation, things may be better by summer.
  15. I have the F.53, it looks even more out of place with that shiny bare metal skin. At least the camo gives it a "tactical aircraft" look
  16. And progressive damage. It would be great, specially in Vietnam. CAS against tanks only is not only inaccurate in some scenarios, also, gameplay wise, it is either too difficult or too easy, depending on having mavericks or not
  17. Not really. But if you are one of those springloaded to jump at the first sight of TW releasing anything new, or any sign them cutting off definitely from PC, you might be interested to check that their store´s page security certificate seems to have expired. Maybe i´m making up too much an assumption of the lean info available about the PC series, but this doesn´t look right. I hope it is just a glitch or a technical issue, but as i said, i´m getting kind of jumpy, even while i had assumed they were done with PC. If so, well, too bad, and i sincerely wish them the best for whatever they work on next and thank them for all their work so far.
  18. Bring it!!! This ain´t no common smurf!! Semper Smurf!! Smurfy Puller!!! I just happened to post this one instead by mistake. However, as it would be a shame not to, i´ll leave it anyways
  19. YO CA!

  20. I forgot to mention, a late mark F-4J, with DECM. And both this and the F-4N should get some AIM-7E4 capability. BTW guys, some of the stuff you posted is way too much for them to be considered DLC stuff. If we don´t keep it reasonably achievable, this doesn´t have a chance to be taken seriously. Please try to keep it simple. EDIT: Sharkmouth skin for F-4N!!!!!! Almost forgot
  21. DLC wise, i would love to see some stuff i would have expected to come along Expasion3, such as: -AI MiG-25s, or Su-17/20/22. Also, since we have Su-9. getting a Su-11 would be nice. Not that they do much, but hey, if Su-9 is worth making, other interceptors could perform better. Lim Frescos, just like we have the chinese versions of the Farmer. Would add a lot of variety for Red Air, sometimes engaging the same aircraft again and again spoils the fun a bit. -NATO F-16s. Not too much to comment on that. -AV-8 for USMC and Spanish Navy -French Mirage IIIE and Mirage5F -Some skinpacks for already existing European aircraft, such as an all green RDAF Hun, French Camo for F-100Ds or a Camo Belgian F-104. -Ported F-5s. Maybe AI only. If we can do with AI only Starfighters, F-5s could be good too. Great for Europe and also good for Vietnam as Skoshis. -It could be great to have a lot of AI only Mirages flyable. I got good stand-ins using other Mirage cockpits. That would apply to the French Mirage5F but also for the Arab Mirages -Also, there are some ships wich would be great. Forrestal or Midway carriers, French, British or Australian carrier to have a home for their DLC shipborne aircraft...it could be solved by using the current ones as stand-ins or with mods, but it would be a class move by TW to provide the carriers for the carrier aircraft you released. Also, some surface ships, like Farraguts or CF Adams would make a nice role both in SEA and NA. Not both necessarily, but either of them. And since we are asking, Newport class LSTs. After all, all the ground forces in Stock are tanks, aren´t they?
  22. The weapons issue jeanba mentioned could be solved with some userlist ini, but it could be tricky to work properly. About the Sam sites SFP1Ace mentioned, a mission editor allowing to deply a whole battery the same way as a fleet would be great. After all, they are already arranged with their own radars and stuff in the maps as time goes by. Also, it would be cool to make a few arrangement to allow for certain terrains and campaigns to be updated, so there could be naval groups in Desert and Vietnam for USN aircraft, don´t know if this is for SF2NA users only or not, but at least give the former that capability.
×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..