macelena

i don´t know your laws, but it could be criminal, not as accesory for the burglary attempt, but by privacy violation,regardless the home intrusion. You just cannot make public private stuff like that and i´m surprised nobody, if not everybody on said map-list, sued the crap out of the entity.

Epic

I think those troubles arise from the fact that the film was originally intended to portray the frustrated manhunt for UBL, and the effect on his searchers. After the success of the operation, the movie concept had to be reimagined, but the original story was Maya´s, and so it remained. On the other hand, i wished too there was more about the planning of the operation and operators getting more screentime. However, i don´t now if it is true, but the saddest i heard that none of the operation SEALs survived to see the film released, don´t know about the other operators.

Congrats kid! I think i was 16 when i arrived here first. Wait till you are 18, driving license means real freedom. Just out of concern, didn´t you mention anything about being not from here? I thought you were british-born or something

Si, se puede con una skin independiente, decals distintos y el texture set para que aparezca a partir de cierta fecha, aunque no lo he hecho nunca, el ejemplo serian los skins de TW, que cambian con el año

Flawed Planet Blowing Space Station: 850 quadrillion dollars Getting the X-wings operational: No much more expensive than the JSF program Getting out-trolled by a public official: Priceless. For everything else, MasterYod...Card

Then i think it will be OK as far as it represents what was available at the era

Well, the Harrier took off the normal way and landed vertical, STOVL "Short Take Off Vertical Landing". While i´ve seen them taking off vertical (everytime i watch it in True Lies gives me chills) short take off was the only way used operationally. I don´t think our CVL could have operated properly with A-4s, but it would have been cool to have Skyraiders

Yeah, he was the last we expected to defect to the russians lol If you don´t want to use a heavily modded install, i would say Foxbats and variable geometry wing Fitters. If you don´t mind the HD, go for Nato Fighters, maybe the best implement available together with campaign specific mods such as ODS

Thanks a lot! Nice to see we have California. About the Belknap class, well, we could use California as stand-in, and Kittiies for Forrestals It could work, but the idea is to make a few ini edits to work with mostly stock stuff. May be used as a template for a modded install, but i mean to consider something quite light in terms of mods.

I have both, i´ll stay with SF2

Yeah, it is cool to see that Phantoms were still around at the time. In fact, i used "someone´s" F-4J_74 and it was cool. I had to remove almost every mod, but i still fly stock F-4Js in those years, thanks to AWG-10, ECM and such it is the best Phantom variant ingame I never mess with any other SAMs. In fact, it would be great if there was some feature in the mission editor to deploy a full battery with proper radar and such, since i feel sometimes SAM presence is scarce to null, quite frustrating if it allows you to cruise all the way into Berlin and out without being even painted. Vietnam or Syria are not as troublesome for that, in fact try to fly a 1975 "Frequent Wind" mission over NV, and SA-6s will stomp anything. I couldn´t fly a F-4N out if i flew higher than 200-300 feet On the other hand, i had no trouble with changing SA-8s role. In fact, now they pop up everywhere. No more boring target practice in strike missions for me, and they still appear in campaign CAS missions to mess with everything i fly into the battlefield. They are the maker in Widowmaker. I lost no Starfighter to MiGs, few to ground fire and crashing for low flight distractions, quite a bunch in stalls, but more to SA-8s than all other causes combined.

Thanks, already did that for CVW-11, all that remains to know is the surface escort. They should be like Shilkas, both covering tanks plus defending airfields and scattered in AAA spots, but not replace them completely

For SA-8s ,just extract their data inis from the objectdata001cat and change the line: GroundObjectRole=MOBILE_SAM (Appears sometimes covering tanks) for GroundObjectRole=MOBILE_AAA (Appears scattered just like ZSUs) About the B-52s, the article i saw had them in SEA camo as late as 1982, and in my install they fly ok, maybe because i had to keep it quite unmodded. About dealing with floggers, there are few things wich can bring one of those mommas down, but it would be better. The way the article i read talked about them was like they were outdated, expensive demolition bomb trucks relegated to making ArcLight style parking lots.

well, despite this seems pretty stopped while TWs priority is on Android (wouldn´t blame them if they left PCs if it is not profitable) i guess we can expect at least Exp3...just don´t know when...or even if, but hope is the last hing you loose, isn´t it? About G limits, i don´t know how many Netzs i´ve broken up recovering (attempting) from supersonic bombing dives...the question would be...why do i keep diving supersonic? I would say "because i can" but facts disencourage it

Wow, i don´t think anyone saw that coming However, it makes sense. More apps, more adds, more cash

I´m an asshole, and now it is me being offended

all aircraft classed as bombers cause freezing when radio interface is used, to greater or lesser extent, something like telling their AIs to divide by zero

I would go with the Growler or Typhoon. On the other hand, i don´t feel in the mood to think about future air combat. I say get UCAVs with PGMs on the soft side of the stick and nukes on the other. No more effing around. A Super Typhoon-like sub with UCAV capability and SLBMs.

Along with his wife. That guy had all the right in the world to be pissed at Bond, to be honest lol

Just in case nobody noticed, there are entries for two RAF FG1 Phantoms in the SF2NA Campaign, arriving in Keflavik as reinforcements. In case you don´t have the DLC, if you have SF2E those will be FGR2s. However, there is another question...as HMS Ark Royal had just been decomissioned, was there any possibility IRL of having RN Phantoms flying of USN carriers as a reinforcement detachment or anything? Besides the fact that the USN/MC already had plenty of them in case they wanted to fill their carriers in with some more. On the other side, could the Ark Royal have been put back in service at that particular time?

SkyFall was OK, but i wished there was a more spectacular and gory death for Bardem. Besides, i got tired of the trend of films with enemy uber elaborated up to senseless plans to wreak havoc, good guys with some trauma to get them to be dumbly evil, and the hero dealing with his personnal cheesy issues and unpractical fighting in the climax...do you hear me, Nolan?

Gracias, lamento no aparecer por aqui con la frecuencia que solia..ni a horas normales. A pesar de ello, agradezco mucho la amistad y simpatía de los compañeros en este foro, os deseo lo mejor y feliz año nuevo.

Aunque sea una broma, sera mejor que no le den ideas al gobierno...