macelena

The bear who copyrighted the idea of ownage back in 1991 Godspeed, sir.

One of the factors is how long do they wait to shoot, rookies wont get as close as aces, neither will they notice you as easily and some other issues

We could, but it would be a better use of time to back up Justin Biebers discography...allright, maybe i went too far this time

As a side note, it would be cool to pay some attention to the RDAF, like an All-green skin for the F-100D and campaign entries, i had none for those or the hunter F.51.

Me gusta...probare suerte con los numeros de serie, a ver si averiguo algo

Ya sali del hospital...gracias por preocuparte Enoc

https://petitions.wh...r-2016/wlfKzFkN

I would speculate (not sure enough to bet) all US Starfighters, Canadians and Gs flyable, F-104S as a DLC (Southern front as DLCs, like A-7H) However, Mirage IIIE is a "must be there"

I think there was something about the terrain, but i´m not sure. However, it fits with your issue

And i´m broke again...i feel like Steve Buscemi in Armaggedon

FELIZ NAVIDAD COMPAÑEROS!!!!!!!!!

Same with SF2NA. In fact, i was waiting for all the show we can make before a release. If we just had some WIP screenies... No new features, just the Mirage F1C , the reskinned F-16, flyable F-104 and MirageIIIE, together with campaign integration and such. Maybe even Mirage5F. And some red air to fill in later years, maybe Su-17s and MiG-25s. I don´t think we are getting all the other aircraft forecasted by ini like Bucc, Jag, Swift, Mosquito, Venom (would be half the postwar RAF) Ouragan nor anyother flyables, but hell, you gotta love the whole thing.

Apparently, it was ruled out. Lockheed (whose legal personnel should have more important things to do) wanted to exercise copyrights for the plane, but it was ruled out since any work for the US government is owned by the government, and as such, its image is of the public domain (not its engineering)

Another thing i have been expecting with EXP3 is the return of the Starfighter. I know it is daydreaming, but to some extent, there are data entries for them, and in SFA there are several variants proposed, research such as the project Grindstone...i don´t know how much would it take to get the cockpits, or if the FM needs much revamping, but since it´s been missed dearly since the jump to the second generation, it would be a hit.

No creo que haya problemas de neutralidad con los cascos azules, aunque sean de la OTAN, por ejemplo, en Líbano han funcionado bien. Respecto a las unidades de operaciones especiales, el problema es que en una zona tan densamente poblada, introducir unidades de tierra, aunque sean comandos, acabaria generando inevitablemente combates urbanos en los que la población civil se veria mucho mas afectada, vease la incursión de Black Hawk Derribado, en la que hubo hasta 10.000 muertos entre la población civil. Personalmente, me parece que el ataque con armamento de precision en miniatura, como SDBs Spikes o incluso los viejos TOW y otros sistemas que moderan los daños bastante en comparación con las bombas de aviación y se pueden lanzar desde UCAVs son menos sangrientos si se emplean ROE y se tiene especial cuidado con las decisiones de ultima hora. Respecto al aspecto político, personalmente creo que esta bien otorgar a la ANP de la consideración de Estado, y debiera haber sido asi hace tiempo. Los israelitas deberian tambien evacuar Cisjordania, y continuar levantando presion amedida que se resuelve el problema, aunque si saldran las cosas bien o no, no tengo ni idea.

Hamas ataca en epoca de elecciones en Israel, cuando sabe que el gobierno Israeli va a responder. Este no puede resistirse a parecer Harry El Sucio, ni puede permitirse parecer blando a la hora de proteger Israel. Asi que Israel bombardea Gaza, y aunque tome muchas precauciones (justo es decir que, aparte de la opción de no bombardear, no se de nadie que se tome tantas molestias por evitar victimas civiles) los de Hamas se aseguran de que las haya, pues saben que la batalla de verdad se libra en los medios de comunicación. El mundo se solidariza con los palestinos, envia fondos y ayuda, y Hamas saca su parte del pastel. Y los habitantes de Gaza se llevan la peor parte. Hamas sigue funcionando como un lider feudal, el gobierno Israeli es reelegido, y muerto al hoyo, vivo al bollo. La solución seria que los cascos azules ocupasen Gaza. La protegen de Israel con los medios necesarios, y se encargan de detener los ataques de cohetes a Israel. La cuestion seria si Hamas permitiria algo asi. No creo que fueran a colaborar con nadie que cuestione su poder.

The people who say the Yanks were air support dependent sissies wich could only win by throwing a massive amount of firepower, all they should get as an answer is "Nuts".

I´ve seen them use AG rockets in Armed recon, CAS, SEAD, antishipping and even doing flak supression when on any strike mission, against ground and seaborne targets

unless reinstall and patching to older levels...i find quite unchallenging the lack of SAMs in any scenarios in single missions, you can fly all the way into east berlin without being painted. On the other hand, SA-6s in North Vietnam in 1975 take a heavy toll in F-4Ns. Wish they had at least some SA-8s in Iceland near the airfields

I´ve been reading lately, on how some USN and USMC squadrons, flying F-4J in Vietnam, transitioned to F-4Ns after the war, in example, VF-84 and VF-41, before getting the Tomcats. Theorically, it is a downgrade, at least when you compare the weapons systems, over the wich, i would take the J before the N anyday. Is it related to flight hours, the Ns being just rebuilt, or something? There would be other squadrons upgrading from B/Ns to Js later in the 70s before getting Tomcats, so i don´t know much about the sense this all makes

Indeed, the Midway class and the wartime stress were the only things that made sense to me. It remains interesting, if not surprising, that CVWs, like CVW-14 aborad Coral Sea during Eagle Claw, had Marine F-4Ns wich would come up against an enemy flying Tomcats or Phantoms wich were at least as good as your own. Personally, in SF2 games, i´ve been enjoying flying the "underdog" Phantoms in the late 70s, and an Iceland campaign flying VMFA-323 F-4Ns from Keflavik is is quite fun.

Not making the whole engine, apparently they got some parts, made some others, then assembled or supplied what they had for the Iranians. They didn´t just manufacture, the also dealed with retired Israeli (irony) Bell 212 and other stuff, had a hangar full of them

The fact is, they have to make a living. If Android is profitable, excellent, but that won´t mean anything about SF2. If the PC game is in deficit, it won´t get any further development, maybe just give it a try, but TW will not waste the money from SFA in a product wich is making them loose money. We may get EXP3, some DLCs and so, but after some time, probably just some special offers.

Glad you are back, people was concerned about your health and even your life lol