squid

1. What would he choose then if not Tomcat , if he wouldn't make avionics improvements ? 2. hmmm i heard F/A-18 Korea ... now that i think about it , i realize yes indeed avionics back there were probably more advanced than current SF2 (and it had a nice training system too :P ) 3. Me too i more than agree about those basic (even for a not hard core sim) avionics improvements and ofcourse environment improvement 4. i know for sure that upgrading the environment graphics at least is within TK plans and so far TK (sooner or) later is stable regarding plans delivery. It has been mentioned as a priority option in one of his polls. Dont know about avionics 5. I value very much that, SF2 have been running smoothly the past few years whatever my pc specs and also that i don't need to spend my limited free time in studying before i even manage to have a chance to jump in the cockpit. If improving those fields without altering those two traits means he needs more time to achieve this so be it , i can still have fun as it currently is, i just appreciate both TK and modders out there that are managing to do ALL this SF2 world stuff that i can't do 6. I think carriers are indeed ..... unsinkable in RL too ? LOL :P ( i havent tried this for ages but i remember trying to sink carriers in LockOn launching against it EVERYTHING in the game arsenal from EVERYONE and it would just not happen lol i think there was a sparrow factory under the deck :P) (*) i also want mission PLAYBACK (with nice random cameras option)

i don't know, i just like pizza

God made real life so we can keep enjoying simulators and our hobby buddies company :P

it feels like the debate & scrutiny frenzy hapening after the first landing of MiG-29s in a Finish airbase back in the 80s

Yes and i strongly recomended that there should be an option to enable it 24/7 ...............

i'd swear i saw this decorative limb on a friend's living room table chairs :lol:

new water graphics , new wakes , populated decks, a bunch of new aircraft , what else could one want ?

why are we referring to NA as "migration" ? won't be a parallel or merged title to israel, europe, vietnam ?

whatever it will be, when was smth TW a dissapointment ? :)

i think i see tom cruise mug in those new pilots or no, i think that was Strike Fighters 2 Indian Ocean

Thanks !

i can hear the mouse clicks and keyboard shortcuts from here this is maybe more correct :

Nozzle seems normal here

bit higher resolution modeling on canopy maybe ?

Some smoother curving on the front part of CFTs

he is definitely very patient

the front end of the canopy is narrower. Up to CJ generations there is a raised rectangular piece which though doesn't seem to exist in 60-70

Nozzle diameter tad smaller than fuselage housing ?

CFT back end profile :) I maybe cut it too steep but you got the idea. something between my angle and the original :)

it looks greatly improved :D i am seeing a few things which i will try to post as soon as i find some free time

also, it would be useful maybe for evaluation purposes to skin it with a single color (light-medium grey) texture . Also the panel lines IF they are not in their correct positions might mislead, confuse or trick the viewer, so i'd suggest also until there is an accurate panel lines template to use just uniform light-medium grey surface. It will reveal better any weak spots :) As long as you are that patient like you have been so far and keep on working on our nit-picking notes this would end up to be a very sweet model :D

- Fuselage on engine area needs to get a bit of curvy profile.(i beefed it up towards up a bit) Its not as cylindrical as its in the model now - smoothing a bit towards down the back area of the CFTs - and perhaps the front of the CFTs is a bit more pointy Thanks for letting us nit-picking :D lol

Thanks MigBuster for doing ALL my work lol its as if you are in my mind lol - Teras, theres still the point under the front end of the radar as MiGbuster showed - The CFTs judging from those RL pics maybe could use a gradual lowering on back

a PROPER cockpit is always much work even if its Rafale or F-35 ;)