Stipe

RIP.

Please post a download!

I´ve been having some problems with Dels F-2A, does anyone know how to fix this?

Maybe

http://www.defender.hr/republika-hrvatska/oruzane-snage/ekskluzivno-hrvatski-migovi-u-akciji-nad-ukrajinom.php Translation:Defender.hr published exclusive photos of flight test of the third consecutive MiG-21 of Odessa, which has not yet received the distinctive colors Croatian dice on the wings and tail planes. Also, it is evident that no airplane serial numbers 133 that belong to him. Unofficially, we learn that the third aircraft will begin painting early next week.

Yes the only known upgrades are tho the navigation and comunication, no "abillity" upgrades... (BTW, the middle antena is there from the 2003 upgrade)

Nice! Please relese it!

Haha...If the F-105 is just as good as the F-35, then the F-22 is the same as the F-4 and the Fletcher-class = Zumwalt-class...

It might not be accurate but in any case its cheaper than your american b*******

I read it in a Croatian aircraft magazine.

I think we will stick with aircraft that are NOW flying and not some kind of SF-monstrosity...maybe in 2100-2200...

The fact is that Russia and China are going for the same tactics as always, quantity over quality and the West, same as always, quality over quantity. That is reflected in the price, 200+ mil. $ for the F-22, and about a 80-100 mil. $ for the F-35,whereas the T-50 is 50-70 mil. $ and the J-20 is 70-80 mil. $

The fact is that the US tresures them so much that the won't ever see the enemy. As for the maintinance, the F-22 is practicly the most expencive warplane to keep in the sky... This some kind of chart I made up of maintenace costs: 1. F-22 2. F-35 3. J-20 4. T-50 5. J-31

1. You should ask your self, witch is better value for money: the 60 million $ Sukhoi Su-35 , or practically the second most expensive airplane ever (behind the B-2)? 2. The Su-35 can fly as far that his pilot will alow (+Refueling), the 22 experiencea 1 mejor fault every hour... 3. It will not be defeated every time, I'm just pointing out that the 22 isn't invincible, and that you should stop acting like it is... 4. I have read recently that the thrust vector on the 22 is the most irelevant component in a dogfight (found out at Red Flag 2013. against some Gripens...)

You are taking it that seriously ... I'm making the comparison based only by the planes dogfighting capability (only guns) ... now put that into context and the 22 wil monster it (by that I meen in operations...with stealth,AESE,Missiles etc.), but them mano a mano and you have a real dogfight on you hands. In witch the Su-37/35 has a little advantage (puting aside the assumption that Americans are better trained then Russians).

I limited the combarison to guns so that the "plane wins the battle" not Aim-120s and R-77s and this is assuming that the F-22 has been found...

My comparation was F-22A vs Su-37, only guns. I think that the thrust vectoring Flanker would win with ease...

If you think about it the Su-27 is a better fighter than the F-22. Pit them against each other with only bullets, who do you think will win ... my guess is the Sukhoi...

You should make a modern ICE version. But it look great!

Is anyone working on a modern MiG-29 cockpit? Something like this:

Any chance of a release?

Central Europe and southeast Europe (Balkan)