MigBuster

Blimey - hope you can last 5 days without being here - get well soon!

Amazing news Falcon - very well done for beating this - have a well deserved drink!!

It gets a few pages in here - so hopefully a lot more detail in the new book

Saw this today - very enjoyable I thought

http://www.afspc.af.mil/news1/story.asp?id=123412412 by Staff Sgt. Jacob Morgan 21st Space Wing Public Affairs 5/28/2014 - PETERSON AIR FORCE BASE, Colo. -- Most people think that during an emergency they would step up to the plate, act heroically and do what is necessary to save lives. Thinking one might rescue the day is a noble thought, but acting on those thoughts is what sets the nation's heroes above noble thinkers. "Every pilot thinks 'what would I do if this all goes wrong' on an aircraft they are not controlling," said Capt. Mark Gongol, 13th Air Support Operations Squadron assistant director of operations at Fort Carson. "As a professional courtesy, we all know the aircrew at civilian airlines are extremely qualified, but as a byproduct of being a pilot, I always have a heightened awareness when flying. However, I never thought I would be in the situation I was in." Gongol, his wife and daughter were on the way from Des Moines International Airport Dec. 30, with 151 other passengers and six crewmembers, after spending the holidays with his family. To him and his family, the day was just like any other, except for a short flight delay due to weather. Approximately 30 minutes into the flight, Gongol, a B-1B Lancer pilot, noticed the engines power down to idle. The thoughts immediately started jumping through his head; there were a variety of reasons why the engines would shut down to idle, none of them categorized as normal. Slowly, the aircraft began to descend and turn right. "Over the public address system; a flight attendant asked if there was a doctor on board the plane," said Gongol. "A few more calls went out for medical professionals and the flight attendants were all hurrying to first class with their beverage carts and a first-aid kit." At that moment, Gongol thought it was a medical emergency with a first class passenger, his instincts told him to stay seated and stay out of the way. A fourth call went out, "are there any non-revenue pilots on board, please ring your call button." Immediately, Gongol realized the pilot was the patient. He looked to his wife; as she gave him a nod, Gongol pressed his button and headed toward the flight deck. Arriving at the flight deck, Gongol saw four flight attendants and two passenger nurses assembling a make-shift bed, medical kits were strewn across the ground and the captain of the aircraft was seated in his chair, eyes dilated, sweaty, clammy and disoriented. Gongol immediately thought the pilot was suffering some serious cardiac trauma. "After they moved the pilot, I was asked by the first officer, 'are you a pilot,' which was quickly followed with 'what do you fly,'" said Gongol. "I knew she was in a serious situation and that question gave her five seconds to judge if I would be useful. I also had about five seconds to asses her, 'was she panicking, or was she OK to fly the aircraft?' We both finished our silent assessments, she made the right judgment and told me to close the door and have a seat." From there, Gongol was calm and collected, and the first officer decided that he would be most useful to talk on the radios, back her up on the aircraft's checklists and look for anything going wrong. Having been an aircraft commander, Gongol is used to making decisions, but he knew the best way to get the aircraft down safely was to play a support role to the first officer and make things as normal as possible for her. In an emergency situation, he had the ability to place himself outside the situation for a second and make the right call. "She was calm, but you could tell she was a little stressed, who wouldn't be," said Gongol. "At the beginning, I interrupted her flow of operations, but we figured everything out extremely quickly. She was very impressive." There were hundreds of issues the two pilots talked through on the aircraft while descending; cabin pressure, approach, contact with air traffic control, visual cues and programming of the auto-pilot were just a few, said Gongol. At about 500 feet above ground level, the first officer hand-flew the approach to a normal touchdown. After landing, the first officer turned to Gongol and asked if he knew where to taxi, she had never been to the Omaha airport before. Taken aback by how cool, calm and collected the first officer had acted without knowing the airport, Gongol remembered landing at the airport before pilot training. "Surprisingly, taxiing was the most stressful part of the day for the first officer," said Gongol. "She had never taxied a 737 before and the ATC had no idea that the pilot was the reason for the emergency. We had to make a quick decision that her switching to the pilot's seat and taxiing the aircraft without the training was necessary to save the captain's life." As the air stairs went down and the aircraft was shut down, Gongol and the first officer talked through the decisions they had just made. Gongol assured the first officer that every decision she made would be backed up by him; he would have taken the exact same actions had he been in her place. The captain of the aircraft is recovering well and contacted Gongol directly to thank him. The crew of the aircraft, the two nurses who provided first aid for the captain and the first officer have all been in contact with Gongol; an emergency has brought together several strangers as friends. "I saw nothing but the finest professionalism under pressure out of the flight attendants, the nurses and the first officer," said Gongol. "Everyone aboard the aircraft remained calm, there is no doubt in my mind this contributed above all else to our successful outcome. In my opinion any military pilot would have done the exact same thing I did." Gongol acted in an emergency situation, realized the role that would be best for him to play and while he was not necessarily the direct savior to more than 150 souls on board, his actions contributed to a safe ending to the flight. His actions, according to him, do not make him a hero. However, they surely place him one step above a noble thinker.

Actually saw it in 3D as well - not that makes any difference I guess Was impressed with oblivion actually - wasn't expecting this one to be any good.

The future is here (with lots of swearing and general weirdness) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gsXqod7Ru-c http://steamcommunity.com/app/295810/reviews/?browsefilter=toprated

If TK has finished with SF2 why not put them on Steam - ED have put DCS there.

Got to be Strategy First being only 1 of the series put up - would TW even get a say?

New film about 2 Vietnam vets meeting up - A MiG-21 pilot who shot down an RF-4C http://www.oldguysandtheirairplanes.com/

Already in consideration - if it ever happens

Where are you running it from? Are you running it as ADMIN?

Examples:

You would still need the specific Weapons editor exe for 2008 - are you using one that came with it? WeaponEditor_022008(SP5).zip

only £5.94 - assume Strategy First can still put it up legally ?

There is HUD symbology with either those or the firestreaks - been a while would need to check.

Heres how to launch a paper plane with laser guided precision

Deterrents don't do much in peace time either Its only a conventional deterrent though - In WW3 I expect it has the amazing capability to take off and fly away if not caught in the blast.

JAS-39 is a good aircraft and countries will obtain jets like that who cant afford or don't have access to the F-35. Aus/Canada feel the F-35 is the best for them and it will allow them to integrate easier with close allies such as the UK & US.

I just love public perception - remember a time when we sent a force to the South Atlantic that included slow, heavily outnumbered short legged SHARs that could only carry 2 x AIM-9s each. - not saying it was ideal - but that aerial combat includes a lot of factors. From Block 4 the F-35 is supposed to be able to carry 6 x AIM-120 internally - will see if that happens......

If you actually look and compare the shaping on the 35 to the 22 there is actually quite a bit there - even the cylinder nozzle has LO properties ( See F-16 LOAN) - so I would happily say its true Stealth Fighter - considering 80% of VLO is supposed to be shaping. You are way off - lets look at potential range shall we F-35A internal fuel = 18,250 lbs USL Thrust Mil = 25,000 lbs F-15E Internal fuel = 18,642 lbs (with CFTs) USL Thrust Mil = 35,600 lbs Now consider the 35 can be clean and still be useful - please tell us how you are coming to the conclusion of poor endurance!! If you had done any research into the F-35 you would see how ludicrous the above statement is - trust me its more than adequate for A-A. Potentially true on cost grounds - but debate-full as the costs are rarely clear or known. You could argue whats the point of wasting money on an air force if it retains obsolete aircraft with outdated tactics - for one thing the pilots would drop a legacy for F-35 without blinking. btw both of these countries have contributed to international conflicts recently (not air policing) - so you have no argument.

Its probably not best to assume total doom based on wild speculation of RCS figures. I would agree an F-35 might not be the first in on a DEAD mission - but thats not related to poor stealth - more to do with maybe using some tactics to negate the opposition for example. http://www.raytheon.com/capabilities/products/mald/

Looking at the manuals - The A-D does have mechanical linkages that provide backup control yes. The E/F does not have mech links though - that relies on quad redundancy and distributed cabling & actuators to get by. Actually not too sure on the F-35 regarding mech back up - last I saw it was just using a triple redundant network based on a 2008 variant of Firewire

I wouldn't worry about how it flies - from what is publicly available the F-35 is very close to the FA-18 regarding flight performance. Like the FA-18 its only pitch unstable (not the case with the F-117) and is also dependent on computers to keep it flying. Getting hit by a bird - well it would do damage depending where it was hit - be no different to any other Jet - apart from damaging any coating. Could it survive damage - e.g. getting hit by a MANPAD? - sure depends where it hits not just the A-10 has made it back - but its also proven it only takes 1 to down any jet.