+EricJ Posted December 8, 2008 Posted December 8, 2008 Looking good man, I have my reservations about GIMP, but hey... it's all good Quote
+ST0RM Posted December 8, 2008 Posted December 8, 2008 Here are some pics of an IIRAF F-5F: http://www.airliners.net/photo/Iran---Air/...iger/1352471/M/ Note that the aft fuselage/burner can section is from another aircraft. Nice touch. http://www.airliners.net/photo/Iran---Air/...iger/1416172/L/ http://www.airliners.net/photo/Iran---Air/...iger/1398085/L/ Great work from all of you guys on this F-5F. Especially FC. Looking forward to the family model. Thanks! Quote
WDH Posted December 8, 2008 Posted December 8, 2008 Looking good man, I have my reservations about GIMP, but hey... it's all good I did too for awhile but,learned how to place decals EARLY this morning!So,maybe there's something I can do in the near future.Thanks! Brady Quote
+FastCargo Posted December 8, 2008 Author Posted December 8, 2008 Also WDH, try Paint.net...it works pretty well, and with a plugin, will work with PSD (Adobe Photoshop) files. I know a few people here who swear by it. FC Quote
WDH Posted December 8, 2008 Posted December 8, 2008 (edited) I was just reading some affidavits on that.MS Photoshop,That really looks like that's what I want too!Now,which arm or leg isn't being used? Maybe,the wife will get for xmas.But,have paint.net too.Just forgot I had it.Thanks FC. Edited December 8, 2008 by WDH Quote
+EricJ Posted December 9, 2008 Posted December 9, 2008 Tried a more "worn" look based off a picture I got off of Airliners.net: Quote
+EricJ Posted December 9, 2008 Posted December 9, 2008 Figured more is better, and it's looking alot better... Quote
+76.IAP-Blackbird Posted December 9, 2008 Posted December 9, 2008 looks really better nice skin! Quote
WDH Posted December 9, 2008 Posted December 9, 2008 Working this scheme and then some.And working......... Brady Quote
sugarblues Posted December 9, 2008 Posted December 9, 2008 Wow EricJ! Every pic just keeps gettin' better and better! BZ! SB Quote
zmatt Posted December 9, 2008 Posted December 9, 2008 I thought F-5s were one seat and T-38s were 2 seat. How can you have a 2 seat F-5? Quote
WDH Posted December 10, 2008 Posted December 10, 2008 I thought F-5s were one seat and T-38s were 2 seat. How can you have a 2 seat F-5? Have you ever watched the movie "Top Gun"?On the movie version the so-called "MiG-28" in black scheme is the "Saints" in the Navy Top Gun school.There's several shots in the movie using F-5Fs' as this aircraft.F-5B's and T-38's are similar to each other.But,to call a F-5F Tiger II a T-38 Talon shows me that you need to check out wiki and read fact sheets to compare the variants.That will get you up to date on your favorite aircraft and any other thing your curious about. Brady Quote
+Soulfreak Posted December 10, 2008 Posted December 10, 2008 How can you have a 2 seat F-5? check this out: F-5B Freedom Fighter F-5F Tiger II T-38 Talon Quote
zmatt Posted December 10, 2008 Posted December 10, 2008 It seems I stand corrected. I just didn't know much about the F-5. So why does such a small aircraft have a two seat combat variant? Do they really need a weapons officer? Quote
Rangerdog Posted December 10, 2008 Posted December 10, 2008 (edited) The idea of the 2-seat F-5s was more of a combat trainer with an instructor in the back seat as opposed to a WSO. IIRC, the early and late F-5 Series included 2 seaters as combat trainers. Early models F-5A singleton and F-5B dual seat. Except for the 20mm cannons, The F-5B had the same combat capabilty (same structure, pylons, etc.) as the F-5A. The Canadian forces used the F-5B as their advanced jet trainer / tactical fighter lead-in platform. Later F-5E single / F-5F dual. A similar story as the F-5A/F-5B, but the F-5F had the F-5E's radar and a single 20mm cannon in addition to the pylons, etc. v/r Rangerdog Edited December 10, 2008 by Rangerdog Quote
+EricJ Posted December 10, 2008 Posted December 10, 2008 Thanks sugarblues. Anybody got some shots of the airbrakes? I'm getting the feeling that I'm almost good to go with the outside but then again not sure... Quote
zmatt Posted December 10, 2008 Posted December 10, 2008 So if they were advanced trainers then what is their reason for existence? The T-38 came first. It seems a little redundant to me. Quote
WDH Posted December 10, 2008 Posted December 10, 2008 So if they were advanced trainers then what is their reason for existence? The T-38 came first. It seems a little redundant to me. A2G gunnery training along with A2A gun training and T-38 training consist with basic ACM.Live rounds and missiles plus radar familiarization is the differences. Brady EricJ, How do I lower the Glossy look to more of a flat paint look? Quote
+FastCargo Posted December 11, 2008 Author Posted December 11, 2008 So if they were advanced trainers then what is their reason for existence? The T-38 came first. It seems a little redundant to me. For the same reason there are two seat versions of the F-16, F-15, F-18, Rafale, Eurofighter, etc. They are mainly designed for initial basic qual in the aircraft. The T-38 is an advanced flight trainer, to transition to higher speeds and fighter type operations. It does not however, train you for a specific aircraft...it carries no armament except for the AT-38B, which can carry a small gunpod or SUU-20 rocket pod/practice bomb rack. That is the difference. FC Quote
+EricJ Posted December 11, 2008 Posted December 11, 2008 Got some corrections from FC, but right now... computer isn't wanting to work, so we'll see if I can't get it working again.. Quote
+EricJ Posted December 12, 2008 Posted December 12, 2008 Having a delay with my comp. Seems a virus got a hold of it (can't update AV like I want to) so I had to restore my comp. Thankfully I backed all my stuff up, so getting that sorted out, and start fixing the errors that FC pointed out. Quote
+Soulfreak Posted December 12, 2008 Posted December 12, 2008 (can't update AV like I want to) so I had to restore my comp. Damn i have the same problem since 1week... Quote
+EricJ Posted December 12, 2008 Posted December 12, 2008 Yeah so there's obviously something running around. I'll have to download WOI again as the restore thoughtfully didn't include the .exe and System files... so yeah.. it's going to be delayed for a minute until I get it worky again. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.