Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 155
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Posted

Here are some pics of an IIRAF F-5F:

 

http://www.airliners.net/photo/Iran---Air/...iger/1352471/M/

 

Note that the aft fuselage/burner can section is from another aircraft. Nice touch.

http://www.airliners.net/photo/Iran---Air/...iger/1416172/L/

 

http://www.airliners.net/photo/Iran---Air/...iger/1398085/L/

 

Great work from all of you guys on this F-5F. Especially FC. Looking forward to the family model.

 

Thanks!

Posted
Looking good man, I have my reservations about GIMP, but hey... it's all good :good:

 

I did too for awhile but,learned how to place decals EARLY this morning!So,maybe there's something I can do in the near future.Thanks!

 

Brady

Posted (edited)

I was just reading some affidavits on that.MS Photoshop,That really looks like that's what I want too!Now,which arm or leg isn't being used? Maybe,the wife will get for xmas.But,have paint.net too.Just forgot I had it.Thanks FC.

Edited by WDH
Posted

post-16817-1228846930_thumb.jpg post-16817-1228847208_thumb.jpg

 

post-16817-1228847320_thumb.jpg

 

Working this scheme and then some.And working.........

 

Brady

Posted
I thought F-5s were one seat and T-38s were 2 seat. How can you have a 2 seat F-5?

 

Have you ever watched the movie "Top Gun"?On the movie version the so-called "MiG-28" in black scheme is the "Saints" in the Navy Top Gun school.There's several shots in the movie using F-5Fs' as this aircraft.F-5B's and T-38's are similar to each other.But,to call a F-5F Tiger II a T-38 Talon shows me that you need to check out wiki and read fact sheets to compare the variants.That will get you up to date on your favorite aircraft and any other thing your curious about.

 

Brady

Posted

It seems I stand corrected. I just didn't know much about the F-5. So why does such a small aircraft have a two seat combat variant? Do they really need a weapons officer?

Posted (edited)

The idea of the 2-seat F-5s was more of a combat trainer with an instructor in the back seat as opposed to a WSO.

 

IIRC, the early and late F-5 Series included 2 seaters as combat trainers.

 

Early models F-5A singleton and F-5B dual seat. Except for the 20mm cannons, The F-5B had the same combat capabilty (same structure, pylons, etc.) as the F-5A. The Canadian forces used the F-5B as their advanced jet trainer / tactical fighter lead-in platform.

 

Later F-5E single / F-5F dual. A similar story as the F-5A/F-5B, but the F-5F had the F-5E's radar and a single 20mm cannon in addition to the pylons, etc.

 

v/r

 

Rangerdog

Edited by Rangerdog
Posted

Thanks sugarblues. Anybody got some shots of the airbrakes? I'm getting the feeling that I'm almost good to go with the outside but then again not sure...

Posted
So if they were advanced trainers then what is their reason for existence? The T-38 came first. It seems a little redundant to me.

 

A2G gunnery training along with A2A gun training and T-38 training consist with basic ACM.Live rounds and missiles plus radar familiarization is the differences.

 

Brady

 

EricJ,

How do I lower the Glossy look to more of a flat paint look?

 

post-16817-1228950233_thumb.jpg

Posted
So if they were advanced trainers then what is their reason for existence? The T-38 came first. It seems a little redundant to me.

 

For the same reason there are two seat versions of the F-16, F-15, F-18, Rafale, Eurofighter, etc. They are mainly designed for initial basic qual in the aircraft.

 

The T-38 is an advanced flight trainer, to transition to higher speeds and fighter type operations. It does not however, train you for a specific aircraft...it carries no armament except for the AT-38B, which can carry a small gunpod or SUU-20 rocket pod/practice bomb rack.

 

That is the difference.

 

FC

Posted

Having a delay with my comp. Seems a virus got a hold of it (can't update AV like I want to) so I had to restore my comp. Thankfully I backed all my stuff up, so getting that sorted out, and start fixing the errors that FC pointed out.

Posted

Yeah so there's obviously something running around. I'll have to download WOI again as the restore thoughtfully didn't include the .exe and System files... so yeah.. it's going to be delayed for a minute until I get it worky again.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..