MigBuster 2,884 Posted July 13, 2014 On a similar theme.................(Transformers beware) WASHINGTON (NNS) -- The U.S. Navy plans to install and test a prototype electromagnetic railgun aboard a joint high speed vessel in fiscal year 2016, the service announced today.This test will mark the first time an electromagnetic railgun (EM railgun) has been demonstrated at sea, symbolizing a significant advance in naval combat.EM railgun technology uses an electromagnetic force - known as the Lorenz Force - to rapidly accelerate and launch a projectile between two conductive rails. This guided projectile is launched at such high velocities that it can achieve greater ranges than conventional guns. It maintains enough kinetic energy that it doesn't require any kind of high explosive payload whenit reaches its target.High-energy EM railguns are expected to be lethal and effective against multiple threats, including enemy warships, small boats, aircraft, missiles and land-based targets."The electromagnetic railgun represents an incredible new offensive capability for the U.S. Navy," said Rear Adm. Bryant Fuller, the Navy's chief engineer. "This capability will allow us to effectively counter a wide-range of threats at a relatively low cost, while keeping our ships and sailors safer by removing the need to carry as many high-explosive weapons."EM railgun technology will complement current kinetic weapons currently onboard surface combatants and offer a few specific advantages. Against specific threats, the cost per engagement is orders of magnitude less expensive than comparable missile engagements. Theprojectile itself is being designed to be common with some current powder guns, enabling the conservation of expensive missiles for use against more complex threats."Energetic weapons, such as EM railguns, are the future of naval combat," said Rear Adm. Matt Klunder, the chief of naval research. "The U.S. Navy is at the forefront of this game-changing technology."This demonstration is the latest in a series of technical maturation efforts designed to provide anoperational railgun to the fleet. Since 2005, the Navy and its partners in industry and academia have been testing railgun technology at the Naval Surface Warfare Center in Dahlgren, Va., and the Naval Research Lab where the service has a number of prototype systems.The final operational system will be capable of launching guided, multi-mission projectiles to arange of 110 nautical miles against a wide range of threats. The series of tests are designed tocapture lessons for incorporation into a future tactical design and will allow the Navy to bestunderstand needed ship modifications before fully integrating the technology.The Navy is using JHSV as a vessel of opportunity because of its available cargo and topsidespace and schedule flexibility. Because JHSVs are non-combatants, there is no plan topermanently install a railgun on any ship of the class. A final decision has not been made onwhich ship classes will receive a fully operational railgun. http://www.navy.mil/submit/display.asp?story_id=80055 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Skyviper 1,101 Posted July 13, 2014 Again another great report there mig buster. Puts me in the mood to watch the Eraser. Self guided bullets.... check EM Rail guns ..............check Sexy robots ................ 32 ft tall assault mechs 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JediMaster 451 Posted July 16, 2014 No, it's a minute from now. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RUSTYMORLEY 162 Posted July 16, 2014 With the possible future marriage of a EM Railgun to a suitable high altitude fighter, does this mean we can intercept those Unidentified Flying Objects which enter earths atmosphere every couple of months and fly around in a controlled fashion and then leave the atmosphere later on - sometimes at unbelievable speeds!!!!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
+logan4 847 Posted July 17, 2014 Why hurt them, the show is free for us and makes people think on a broader scale sort of out of the box. Makes you take of the blinds from your eyes. No reason to risk an interplanetary race, we would surely loose, if you think.. they already got here from somewhere.....How far we got -- Moon with a manned tin can. Live and let them live is a better option, you might learn something on the long run when start to openly cooperate in the future. Then you will get the technologies you wish to gain, now by shooting one out of the sky you only say "Hey! leave us alone we are still barbarians!!!" Mankind has to grow up intellectually to get an open approach, will not happen by some trigger happy fella.... and that is true for space exploration advancement too. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites