Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

A couple of the early MF F-14A skins only have the anti-glare markings on the left intake.  Was this intentional, or was it left off by mistake?  Thanksimg00864.thumb.JPG.4225e718108fdec57986f8a047a1909e.JPG

Edited by JSF_Aggie
Posted

That was by design.  I went through a lot of pictures of early F-14s and many of them used the single anti-glare marks over the left intake.  They also changed pretty significantly sometimes, so I tried to go with the paint jobs settled upon for each squadron's inaugural cruise.

Couple examples of VF-14 specifically:

VF-14A.jpg.3a43f4652f58ed9a3545518fc1f036e2.jpgVF14.jpg.bd0b1616a87e219b915d21995940f76b.jpg(No anti-glare on the right)

 

Was similarly used for VF-1, VF-2, VF-32, and a number of other high-viz Turkey squadrons.

Posted

that looks more like a walkway than an A-G surface to me. Compare the coloration and texture to the A-G around the windscreen and canopy

Posted

Gah!  I knew I wasn't calling it the right thing.  I even used "anti-skid" in the accompanying document!  (e.g., in the CVW-14 paragraph: "The paint schemes included are those decided upon for that cruise, to include an anti-skid strip painted only over the left intake nacelle, and VF-2's red "warning" paint over the wing boxes of their aircraft.")

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..