Caesar

I usually fly on Hard. I also spend most of my time in the F-14, which feels more natural on Hard. If memory serves, yes, some of the newer aircraft are more accurately represented on Normal, and the AI uses Normal as well.

That is the first thing I thought when I read this.

Well, the treaty says you can't have WMD in space, it doesn't say you can't have weapons (in general) in space (The Outer Space Treaty of 1967). Prezact wording is: "States shall not place nuclear weapons or other weapons of mass destruction in orbit or on celestial bodies or station them in outer space in any other manner" Which is how ballistic missiles are legal - they don't attack from space, they attack through space (i.e., they never achieve orbit, even if they do leave the atmosphere). I'm still not entirely certain what the aim is with this new Space Corps, but then, it's above my pay grade.

You would be correct in thinking that - there may have been plans for one, but it was never implemented. Similarly, there are commented-out entries for intake ramps in the data.inis, but even when activated, the ramps don't move.

Star Fox II? Dammit, now I have to buy this. Which sucks, because I have an SNES already.

Pensy, Yes, I remember those FD missions well! It would be nice to see something like that for sure, but I'm not aware of any current efforts to make a modern Korea campaign. As for VF-103, no I haven't gotten around to making that yet. Not like it was a very complex sceme to do; a gray arrow with drab-yellow inlay on the tail, AA tailcode and Sara markings...I just need to get off my ass and do it.

Tom Cruise stars as Tom Cruise in the action flick of the summer: Top Gun: Tom Cruise!

Just saw the E3 trailer...they not only still have the F-14D, they got rid of that stupid DOGFIGHT MODE! Now I have to consider buying a PS4...dammit. EDIT: Nevermind, it's coming out for Steam. Count me in!