russouk2004

I suggest nvidia default settings...just use scale I use between 2 and 4 at most....dds causes lots of oddities with bumps...I find it makes the spec areas that are covered by bumps go lumpy.... I suggest Jpegs as they seem to be fine with the game and max.... also sometimes max settings for spec colour and level...plus glossiness if too high cause similar....let the spec map do the highlighting not the max settings..the Maps rollouts rather than main ones by texture selection boxes..

If I was on this flight...that would wake a few people up eh...lol

cut meshes on panel lines if possible...hides cuts well.

with the ub download theres a decal and steering fix...did you download it too? I found even with fix...no decals work because no numbers.LST and texture list in the ub.ini arent present.

did they come with UB or u make em...if urs post em up here.

looks ok ...Ive found nice way to give the rivets that sunken in view.....copy layer set them to a mid grey(for better spec(or white even for height surrounding rivets to do same)) and add small amount of blur,medium sharp,to make shadows as small as possible giving the sunken look... basic render no bump or spec.. Left Rivets...basic 1 pixel with layer below of same rivets,and low average blur to add shaded sunken look... mid rivets with same but with reversed colour blurred 1 pixel... right rivets 1 pixel black...layer below is same rivets with average blur as per left side with reverse colour(white)...with additional blur to give more shaded look..whn appled to spec...right looks like rivets are sunken slightly and with shadow...

MinBaseSize=SMALL CarrierBased=TRUE CarrierParkSpan=18.50 CarrierParkAnimationID=-1 From panther

Suprised she aint a nuc powered ship though...saying that ...the engines are more than capable....just needs to refuel more than a nuc....I think our boffins are afraid of ships with nuc power...subs are ok cos they hardly ever at home lol...

One query...do us carriers have the thrust dispersing jets in decks ?...2?17

ExhaustEmitterName=CleanExhaustEmitter

Might do as I particularly liked the K`s...got a few things trying to tie up and get out so much 99% ready lol....need to empty my Factory lol.

yeah models named in data.ini as ModelName= ALQ-184_3Band actual model name is Body_Front

lights are shit in 2009....I use best settings for light and shadow to test..active shadows....only way...

some carried EMI Recce pods British RAF Phantom squadrons were role oriented, with the early strike squadrons (6, 14, 17, 31, 41, 54 and later 2 Sqns) carrying 4 x AIM-7 E-2 Sparrows, 4 x AIM-9D and mixes of SNEB rocket pods, 1000lb or 750lb iron (GP) bombs, or BL755 CBUs. A B61 nuke could also be carried on the centreline rack, or the SUU-23 gunpod or an EMI recce pod (although only 12 aircraft were wired for that) or the 600 gall tank. A strike camera could also be carried in the port Sparrow well. CBLS practice bomb carriers were another option. No British Phantoms, including the F-4J(UK), ever carried active ECM gear, even those German-based machines at the height of the Cold War. The only regular ECM carried was the tail-mounted RWR, which was passive. It used audio, plus strobes rather than alphanumerics to alert the crew to threats. The FG.1 originally did not have SUU-23/A 20mm rotary cannon capability like the FGR.2. The RAF added this capability from around November 1974 at RAF Leuchars. There were no ECM pods used as far as is known. The Westinghouse AN/ALQ-101(V)-8 "Dash Eight" was bought for Buccaneers and Jaguars, along with AN/AVQ-23 Pave Spike designators for the Buccaneers, in the mid-late 1970s, by which time Tornado was coming on line with its own special gear and the ageing Tooms were flying air defence. Phantoms at Missile Practice Camp at Valley could carry a missile launch photo pod based on an AGM-12 Bullpup body

must work for weaps... 2br uk has distance lods so maybe typo somewhere...post up ini so maybe we can spot summat you havent. Filename=ALQ-184_3Band_LOD2.LOD try naming to > ALQ-184_3Band_LOD1.LOD [WeaponData] ObjectFullName=Double Ejector Rack ObjectDataFile=2BR_uk_jag_data.INI [LOD001] Filename=2br_uk_jag.lod Distance=100 [LOD002] Filename=2br_uk_jag-001.lod Distance=200 [LOD003] Filename=2br_uk_jag-002.lod Distance=500

Never done them on a weap so dont really know...one thing...doubt its that...name too long ? on No2 ?

maybe its just a small heirachy error in lod2?

interesting yeah but think I`ll pass.

just a thought...use mues lod viewer and check names \ formats of textures ...if gaps in list then missing textures....or wrong ones installed.

As I was posting the above...watching "War of the Factories" on tv..about Germanys industrialists and high command failure to agree on what they needed.....and this a\c was shown....in a brief few seconds ... how cool is that lol..

Revamp with higher res textures....still very much wip...ignore right side...

weird

Try xform reset on it...recentre pivot and re-export...as you know pivot set to base of object ;)

my bf109f jpg 1024x1024 is 698kb bmp is 3mb...and takes longer to load 4 planes...about 15 seconds more...for bmp...and I use paintshop pro 7.4 to do my jpegs.

Sicily Summer 1941...and later 1942 somewhere over Egypt.