kukulino

:pioneer:

Hi gerald! Good news you have And nice avatar too I have question for modders: Is it easier make rivets and panel lines in 3D program on model? I have hear yes, it is easier. Made new panel lines and rivets on "clear" BMP in paint program is bit problematic I think. Similar with make camo scheme (this is hard, but possible. Tooks me five days, but looks good. I made cca 100 test screeshots ). What do you think guys?

I tried reskin your J-5 model. This is original fuselage: This is my try. I tried make some rivets for test on J-5: This is test skin on J-5 in game. Rivets are deformated: I tried paint engine section too: But when I painted needed part with needed colour, this new painted map was showed on fuselage too, not just in engine. I tried resize that my paint "map", but no success. I haven't got screenie, becouse I deleted it some time ago. I discussed this with my friends, modders, and conclusion was that I can not make good skin, becouse problem is in model mapping. I can not change this, so I did not tried make newer and nicer skins for J-5, becouse it is not possible, I am afraid. So I agree with streakeagle in this his opinion: "Keep making whatever it is you like for whatever reasons." Nobody can not stop you post here what you want, of course. It is gift from you to community and I personally THANK YOU for your work. I do not agree with streakeagle in this (If streakeagle meas me too. But I think it was in nobody mind too): "Don't let anyone discourage you because your interests don't fit into their agenda... Unless they want to pay you and you accept their offer of payment." Becouse something like that was not in my mind. I apologize to YOU fallout3, if my words were not clear in previous posts. My english is not the best so some my formulations are not clear sometimes (maybe often ) . I am sorry if I discourage you. But similar, when I released some my skins or ini tweaks or other things (not so hard like 3D modding in general), poeple said me good work - if it was good, or good work... but... you have some problematic parts in your mods. Than I looked into my mods, discussed with friends about problem, and if it was needed, we changed problematic parts. So I tried make skin for your J-5 (you wanted this from us), but looks like only you (as J-5 modder) can change that problematic parts on fuselage on your model. Problematic mapping was noticed with more poeple, so It is needed say you about this problem, if we can not fix it. So this was hidden in sence of my sentence posted upper: "So I am looky forward to new Mig-19. Hope it will be much better than previous J-5 model and better than stock Mig-19S." Hope you understand me now. Keep your good work for community. Good luck in mods. I am looky forward especially to Sukhoi models. According to screenies looky very nice :spartak: Cheers Ľubo

Thank you for explanation :yes: But I still think that my GF is crazy

I am sorry for my unclear formulation I mean this. Ship in WOE: Carrier in WOE/WOV: Both ships are moving, but carrier is missing that "white tail" on the water. As I said, my card is crazy sometimes, so if nobody has noticed this, it means that I have problem with that lovely card.

Thank you too. Nice little tweak :yes:

Yeah Occam's razor :yes: It is not necessary have many same things. But we can have many similar things ---- Mig-21F/F-13/F-13CZ for example. And there is one famous Mig-21 version "forgotten" by modders in SFP1 world: Mig-21FL (Type 77 in Indian license). Usable in India-Pakistan conflicts and in Israel-Arab too. I know that there was this version made by Howling I think and updated by Wrench, but as Wrench wrote, it was ini edit, not new 3D model. Just suggestion :yes:

If this new model will be better than stock one, my choice is clear :yes: We have much higher standard in models quality than anytime before. Old stock Mig models need replace I think. Mig-21F was "replaced" by Mirage factory F/F-13/F-13CZ, stock Mig-21PFM with skin from Mirage factory is on much higher standard. Stock Mig-21MF with hi res skins looky good too. Mig-17, Mig-19, Mig-21PF/PFV need some help. So I am looky forward to new Mig-19. Hope it will be much better than previous J-5 model and better than stock Mig-19S. Good luck :yes:

My GF 7600GT is crazy too sometimes. I have feeling shot her through the window... Closed window, of course Is in your game white clue when ship is treveling? I have it there sometimes and sometimes no (WOE). In WOV I have no white clue. I have older drivers. Newer were problematic. But I can try newest... On weekend... Limited downloading per month

So new modder incoming? Congrats/Gratulujem :yes:

Ouuuha!!! Stary!!! Do you want kill us??? You know how make great mods greater... This is exactly what SFP1 missing in its world :yes:

WaaaaAAAA!!!! I must go to school, so I can not try it now Heeeeelp!!!!

Tak sa nám pretrhlo vrece s dobrými modmi http://forum.combatace.com/index.php?autoc...p;showfile=6996 Netestol som zatial, ale usudzujem, že je to dobrá vec z videí a screenshotov. Kto by vedel viac, mohol by hodit par slov či je to fakt také dobré ako sa javí :yes:

Personally I do not like what ifs, especially fictional planes But if it is possible, so why do not make them BTW, all campaigns in WOE for example are what if, so they are fictional. This what if scenario looks good to me :yes: And small deck is danger for plane, but it is possible land on it in SFP1 series world, of course. If somebody like some reality and want land just in cockpit view, it is really controlled crash... Happy landing on small carrier deck depends on good method. Various planes have various pits in SFP1 series (Thanx to God and modders). Skyhawk has ideal view from cockpit, Crusaders view from pit is not so good. I tried many times put Crusader on small deck. The only safe way was hit key for "remove" cockpit, and see just gunsight reticle... Than was happy landig But I like some reality, so tried put him on deck with standard cockpit view. After dozen crashes I concluded, that good method is: landing from curve. Crazy formulation, but my english is not best. This is example. Actor. F4U Corsair (bit different from F-8 ) http://br.youtube.com/watch?v=idfFUQEPwgg&...feature=related You can see carrier deck from Crusader cockpit longer than in classic landing (so easy with Skyhawk). Still danger, but good adrenaline after exciting mission :yes:

Hey Stary, thanx for another green "hell" Looks fantastic again And "girls at the university"? I have this problem solved too

Any news about awaited Korean terrain repaint, tree mod and enhanced target pack, please?

Thank you too! I just want note that I had those files as TGAs not BMPs in my install.

Oh, yes, study :yes: But students life is so sweet

Looky great!!! Any chance for Su-25 navalised version? http://www.palba.cz/forumfoto/displayimage...&fullsize=1

Ďalší "stromový" mod od CA_Staryho pre Madagaskar terén: http://forum.combatace.com/index.php?showtopic=30371

Agree with Brain32 :yes:

Hey Stary, I want to buy parcel on that nice tree island (just me and my Flanker ). Is there some free place for us? But do not say it to my girlfriend I feel wood flavour from those screenies Great work again :yes:

rgr that :yes:

Which Su-27 version it will represents? You posted Su-35BM topic, so this version? We need ugraded Su-27 versions, whose are usable in A2G missions too. This newer soviet planes are missing in game. There is way edit Su-27 for personal use, of course for everybody. But official mod, discussed in its own topic is ideal way how to get it in life :yes: But this supposed project leader who coordinate informations and than he add them into his WIP, of course. So you are project leader and modder, so new mod is comming soon, as you wrote. Looky forward

Ouha!!! Very nice Frikulin (shortcut we use together with my friends for free/cool/in ... Frecolin... or Frecoolin... Hehe ) Can not wait show it to my Mig family in WOE