Dave

The pilot was killed....

But you know what I can get you about a 1000 post when people cry realism fouls. Of course people will download it. Good on Allen for doing the updates. It was a just a subject of discussion.

Damn :(

Thanks Tank, I got Stormer coming by here later to look at them too. That guy is the cause of my new addiction. Hopefully he will pop by and show off some of his work he has done.

A few more.

Ok here is a few Tank what do you think?

If you have a HD space issues then this would help. I just did it to see if I could. By the orginals campaigns I mean Burning Sands etc that came with SF.

I mean the detail is amazing, the damn turbines in the engines turn!

Congrats Brian to you and the wife. I just thought of something....... 11 POUNDS!!!!!!!!! Holy cow...........

You are very correct. Also the F-22 is no longer the F/A-22, the USAF dropped the A awhile ago. Some said it sounded too Navy.

Well I went out today to try my new found knowledge, the only thing I didnt do was shoot in RAW. I forgot about that, but give a few and will post them.

Nice work shev! How is Saigon these days? I heard its the city that never sleeps now and worth visiting.

No there isn't a tutorial, but just copy what Tristan said, the planes, the terrain and the campaigns and you should be good to go. I did it to fly the original campaigns in WOE and it worked great. NATO Fighters is for a totally unmodded version of WOE, adding anything like the weps back and it will cause you major issues.

100% agreed. You would think someone would of thought of that instead of some guys on a forum. Maybe we should be the engineers.

Well that doesn't have anything to do with the F-22 as an aircraft, that has to with some software engineer who should be out of a job by now. I mean lets not tit for tat here, the SH didn't have teething problems? Oh yeah it did...

Then you way beyond the scope of what was really done and what wasn't, just because it could, doesn't mean it did. That is the reality of combat aircraft and I can get real world fighter pilots to back me up on that. I will go with what they have to say then a book or the internet any day. The IAF example was the 1% I was talking about.

It will be well worth it. This is even better than his Skyraiders...

Its just the point for example yesterday I was talking to Julhelm about the A-5A loadouts. Yes it could carry conventional, however, I know a retired Navy O6 who works at Tinker as a contractor, who flew them, and he said all they did was the nuclear mission in the A-5A. Never did they fly a conventional mission. So I think that the "yeah they could of" but the "what they did in practice" should be taken into consideration. Same goes for F-111's, they flew well over 95% without AIM-9's. But some wanted it so we added it. In retrospect, I think we should of left it A2G 100%, no A2A stuff.

For the record Allen I am not busting your nuts. I just have a vision of how things should be in the Mil aircraft world. Bombcat: NOT..... Cardinal sin...... SH: Fleet Defender....AH.......No A-6: Pure Mud mover F-15C with A2G ordinance, surely you just...... Just some examples... Just some examples.......

A song and dance number?

I try not to think, it hurts my head.

I would just leave the Sidewinders off of them. I mean it flew 99.9% of the time without them. I have only seen one picture with them on it. I mean theres what it could carry and what it did carry. So many people shout "realism realism", where then, there is your answer. It was a strike fighter, leave it as it was. Anything else is getting to the realm of ridiculous. Just my 2 cents.

Yes the D40 has shutter speed priority. I was just eading about RAW, I can also shoot in RAW/JPEG where is does one of each.

Go ahead Tank. I am learning from all this. I knew those shots weren't great.

Here I was testing the zoom lens...I was 200 yards away from the Deuce when I took that. I am impressed.