jeanba

Mig Yes, this is the reference article. The Rafale had an advantage but did not claim a "sure kill". Still, the Rafale was not as ridiculous as was often claimed

Well, in this case, and whatever the reasons : The F-22 was loosing quickly :)

Hello This video is much discussed on french forums. Its interest is more on the HUD views during a complete dogfight than in the comments. The comments must be at best "discussed in the context" : the author seemed to have been fed up by other countries fanboys denigrating the Rafale. As to the Typhoons, it seems that the context was "training novice typhoon pilots" by "experienced french pilots", who "played the red side". A good matchup would have been experienced Typhoon vs experienced Rafale pilots.

Thank you for this work, the Su-17/20 family has a lot of "potential"

I gave it 5 stars !

Yes, I understand

Nice one Do you intend to make a "true" Etendard IV ?

Great !!!!

add : Is this 54 squadron ?

Great I had to change some file formats, but it works now. I made 2 missions but was shot down by "maneuver kill", trapped between a Haw battery and a Shahak ! I just would like to add the Su-20, which squadron did they belong to ? THnak you in advance

It's been 8 years that my Mig is flyable ! And you don't need to "read only" the file. The problem is that the screen freezes when I select the campaign.

Bad news, it does not work with my install. :(

Lot of framerate drops disappeared, so it looks ok to me

Which conformal flare launcher ? Alkan 5021 ? I can send it to you, just have to add a station. Anyway, it was used only on late F1CR, F1CT and maybe some export versions For the Lacroix, I have to check

Also, will it be possible to replace the Parachute fairing by a Lacroix flare dispenser ? I can change the data.ini, to add a station, but the CAD can be changed in this case for higher accuracy. Once again, all info here : http://www.airvectors.net/avmirf1.html :

Thank you, it is much more convenient

I had the same thoughts as Russo, and it scares me too

Don't thank me,thank gillouf : http://www.checksix-forums.com/showthread.php?t=181643

RWR : Load factor indicator is now below (thick red line) The thin red line is the sight angle indicator.

It's a BF so a visual one, like in the Mirage IIIE or french jaguar The small "plane" just right of TV display, very different from US type RWR

Unfortunatly, I am struggling to find one. But its presence is attested in most sources such as this one : http://www.airvectors.net/avmirf1.html

It is worth checking the difference between the 2

Hello Phimat is only a contraction of Philipps / Matra. As such there are a lot of variants of the Phimat, and its content : I know that for the Super-Etendard, the phimat contained chaffs, it is likely the same thing for the jaguar (from what I udnerstood, the "full" version was too heavy). For the Mirage IVP, it was a combination of flares and chaffs. I don't really know for the Mirage III and 5F. For Mirages F1, I think it was both. For most British and German planes, it was both. All those information being subject to corrections. So I think we need for the 2 or even 3 variants : - 60 chaffs - 120 chaffs - mix Nato5 uses the combination, the Mirage III from Deoliveiraand team use 60 chaffs, they should be differentiated. Thank you in advance