Brain32

That's were I am from the begining

28 miles is pretty low, I've read PS-5 is able to track up to 70-90km(I have 90km in my ini's ), although Gripens are meant to work in data link mode of some kind where their tracking range should go up to 160km

It's a skin , readme is in the archive.

Yeah I'm watching it parallel actually, Argentina had quite an offensive at the end of the game, the long shot by Messi was awsome...

I'm watching Nigeria getting robbed vs S.Korea...

Hmm I don't know what's in the ini(I have my own version). Anyway while data for PS-5 radar is scarce most sources say it can detect a fighter sized aircraft at 120km.

Even if they loose which should be a miracle as I don't really think Greece can do it, they would have to loose by a lot. I gave a prognosis for Argentina - Greece = 3:0

Worry not, that's perfectly normal lol I remember when Croatia played against Australia on the last WC, one of our players got 3 yellow cards

Don't be so quick on that, one thing I've learned about Italy national team is - they can always win the championship. I am not one bit concerned about Italy dropping out until I see it happening. I know you look at it with more heart so to say, but for "3rd party" watchers Italy is always a favorite...

Runs great here too

Excellent Monty

Some more obvious differences: G-2 - basic Gustav G-6 - MG131 cowl bulges, main wheel bulges on wings, non-retractable tail wheel G-6(late) - same as G-6, but with "Galland hood" canopy G-6AS/ASM,G-10,G14 - MG-131 bulges are more streamlined, other things are pretty much same, mosty different antenna mast is in question K-4 - retractable tail wheel again, different antenna mast(not sure but AFAIK it is) Those are just some main visual differences without checking my WW2 airplane library, performance differences are mostly engine related although streamlined MG131 cowl bulges and retractable tail wheel on the K-4 gave for a less draggy aircraft making K-4 one of the fastest WW2 propeller driven planes...

Brutal. http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xdnwm0_1-0-matchhighlight-com_sport#from=embed?start=3

I would say Brasil first but they don't look as convincing this year, so I think Argentina might go through. Other American teams I don't think have that level of quality to compete for the 1st place. From Europe my No1 favorite is Spain. They played seriously good on the last Euro and they are...well...really, really good. Germany's team seems to be a bit too young for mayor achievements although Germany could probably win with 11 schoolgirls thanks to their supreme tournament mentality, anyway in upcoming years I expect Germany to kick some major butt once the young players gain expirience. England is insanely strong however they have a nasty habit of scre*ing things up when they are least expected so this time I don't expect big things from them although they always have a team that is perfectly capable for final game. Italy is always good but you never know what to expect, they could in the same time be world champions or fail to pass the first group, nobody knows lol Other European teams IMO can't compete for the highest level at this moment. African, Asian and other teams still have a long way to come to be able to seriosly compete with European and South American teams. Europe and South America is where football (soccer) is other parts of Earth yet have to catch up, closest being Africa... Actually I think the first World Champions that are not from Europe or S.America will probably be from Africa but not this year..

I still think it will be about Lybia...

AFAIK it's G-10

I can see it normally

They really kick ass this year. I hear Wallace is schooling Howard lol I can't watch it here

Quite strange I must say since roll rate and aileron stifness was one of the biggest issue for the spits since the begining of the design, they did make a change and put all metal ailerons on MkV that did improve things but after that the wings barely changed at all... Anyway I only have a chart from RAAF testing:

Everything is cool, just a small correction here, Spit quite certainly didn't have an edge in roll rate as she was one of the worst in that department among all ww2 planes while P-51's were among the best... Other than that, Spitfire should completely eat a P-51(and pretty much any other ww2 plane of the ETO) in sustained turning, huge eliptical wings and a good P/W - one just can't miss with that. Also it had quite a large (sustained)climb rate advantage over the P-51. I think you guys are right, AI simply can't or rarely does use BnZ tactics properly and that's why they get slaughtered. I even tried to lead them through the whole fight, attack/rejoin/attack etc. but no use, they would just stick to the spit, slow down and goodbye..

Maybe even worse, G6 airframe, oversized Jumo engine with unsuitable prop blades, and on top of that cannon gondolas...ouch that will be sweet lol

1. AH-64 Apache 2. Updated MiG models from TW (new MiG-15 looks awsome, much better than ol' 17) 3. I actually don't know, maybe new MF Vipers quality level F-16I Sufa