mehlmehlmehl

View File Attila 1979 Operation Attila 1979: After the skirmish for Cyprus the tension never really cools down. In September 1979 the full war broke out and every side fight for the strategic aims. PLEASE BE AWARE: This release of Attila 1979 is unpolished and is to be considered a Beta version. In short, there will be bugs and not all of them have been found. Thanks to: Anatolia v2 Terrain.............. Anatolia v2 (09/25/2011) for SF2 Series by PureBlue LTV A-H/E & TA-7H/C Corsair II Polemikì Aeroporìa (HAF) pack................. by paulopanz F-4E TuAF pack...................... By ravenclaw_007 SF2 HAF F-4E_SRA..............by ace888 F-100D TuAF........ by paulopanz F-102A Delta Dagger(*)................. by paulopanz SF2 F-104 Starfighter Super Mega Pack 2016................ by viper63a Turkish Air Force F-104S CB for SF2.................... By PureBlue and some more … THANKS Submitter mehlmehlmehl Submitted 12/19/2019 Category User Made Campaigns  

MiG-21F-13 in East German Air Force had 60 rounds too …

View File Salazar Operation_Salazar: From 1966 onward, the pro-independence guerrilla movement MPLA expend their previously-limited insurgency operations to the East of Angola. The UNITA, a smaller pro-independence guerrilla organisation established in the East, support the MPLA. The FAP start counter-insurgency military campaign, called Operation Salazar, to expel the guerrilla movements operating in the East to beyond the frontiers of Angola. The Government of South Afrika supports the efforts of the FAP. PLEASE BE AWARE: This release of Operation_Salazar is unpolished and is to be considered a Beta version. In short, there will be bugs and not all of them have been found. Thanks to: Angola/South West Afrika Full terrain With REDONE Campaigns v2.0.............. by Spudknocker Força Aérea Portuguesa F-84G Skinpack 1.0.0................................... by paulopanz Fiat G.91 "Gina" Pack 1.0.01.................................................. by Soulfreak SF2 F-86F-40 Sabre Remod Pak.................................................. by Wrench An-2.......................................................................... by Starfighter (FM), Diego (skin), and Pasko (the rest) C-47A......................................................................... by Kesselbrut, modified by Charles, Paulopanz DeHavilland Chipmunk.......................................................... by bigal1 and some more ................................................................ THANKS Submitter mehlmehlmehl Submitted 01/04/2020 Category User Made Campaigns  

May these helps to answer the question: Manual Command to Line-Of-Sight (MCL) Both target tracking and missile tracking and control are performed manually. The operator watches the missile flight, and uses a signaling system to command the missile back into the straight line between operator and target (the "line of sight"). This is typically useful only for slower targets, where significant "lead" is not required. MCLOS is a subtype of command guided systems. In the case of glide bombs or missiles against ships or the supersonic “Wasserfall” against slow-moving B-17 Flying Fortress bombers this system worked, but as speeds increased MCLOS was quickly rendered useless for most roles. Semi-Manual Command to Line-Of-Sight (SMCLOS)Target tracking is automatic, while missile tracking and control is manual. Semi-Automatic Command to Line-Of-Sight (SACLOS)Target tracking is manual, but missile tracking and control is automatic. Is similar to MCLOS but some automatic system positions the missile in the line of sight while the operator simply tracks the target. *SACLOS has the advantage of allowing the missile to start in a position invisible to the user, as well as generally being considerably easier to operate. SACLOS is the most common form of guidance against ground targets such as tanks and bunkers. Automatic Command to Line-Of-Sight (ACLOS)Target tracking, missile tracking and control are automatic. Command Off Line-Of-Sight (COLOS) This guidance system was one of the first to be used and still is in service, mainly in anti-aircraft missiles. In this system, the target tracker and the missile tracker can be oriented in different directions. The guidance system ensures the interception of the target by the missile by locating both in space. This means that they will not rely on the angular coordinates like in CLOS systems. They will need another coordinate which is distance. To make it possible, both target and missile trackers have to be active. They are always automatic and the radar has been used as the only sensor in these systems. The SM-2MR Standard is inertially guided during its mid-course phase, but it is assisted by a COLOS system via radar link provided by the AN/SPY-1 radar installed in the launching platform. Line-Of-Sight Beam Riding Guidance (LOSBR)LOSBR uses a "beam" of some sort, typically radio, radar or laser, which is pointed at the target and detectors on the rear of the missile keep it centered in the beam. Beam riding systems are often SACLOS, but do not have to be; in other systems the beam is part of an automated radar tracking system. A case in point is later versions of the RIM-8 Talos missile as used in Vietnam - the radar beam was used to take the missile on a high arcing flight and then gradually brought down in the vertical plane of the target aircraft, the more accurate SARH homing being used at the last moment for the actual strike. This gave the enemy pilot the least possible warning that his aircraft was being illuminated by missile guidance radar, as opposed to search radar. This is an important distinction, as the nature of the signal differs, and is used as a cue for evasive action. LOSBR suffers from the inherent weakness of inaccuracy with increasing range as the beam spreads out. Laser beam riders are more accurate in this regards, but are all short-range, and even the laser can be degraded by bad weather. On the other hand, SARH becomes more accurate with decreasing distance to the target, so the two systems are complementary. Manual Command to Line-Of-Sight (MCL) Both target tracking and missile tracking and control are performed manually. The operator watches the missile flight, and uses a signaling system to command the missile back into the straight line between operator and target (the "line of sight"). This is typically useful only for slower targets, where significant "lead" is not required. MCLOS is a subtype of command guided systems. In the case of glide bombs or missiles against ships or the supersonic “Wasserfall” against slow-moving B-17 Flying Fortress bombers this system worked, but as speeds increased MCLOS was quickly rendered useless for most roles. Semi-Manual Command to Line-Of-Sight (SMCLOS)Target tracking is automatic, while missile tracking and control is manual. Semi-Automatic Command to Line-Of-Sight (SACLOS)Target tracking is manual, but missile tracking and control is automatic. Is similar to MCLOS but some automatic system positions the missile in the line of sight while the operator simply tracks the target. *SACLOS has the advantage of allowing the missile to start in a position invisible to the user, as well as generally being considerably easier to operate. SACLOS is the most common form of guidance against ground targets such as tanks and bunkers. Automatic Command to Line-Of-Sight (ACLOS)Target tracking, missile tracking and control are automatic. Command Off Line-Of-Sight (COLOS) This guidance system was one of the first to be used and still is in service, mainly in anti-aircraft missiles. In this system, the target tracker and the missile tracker can be oriented in different directions. The guidance system ensures the interception of the target by the missile by locating both in space. This means that they will not rely on the angular coordinates like in CLOS systems. They will need another coordinate which is distance. To make it possible, both target and missile trackers have to be active. They are always automatic and the radar has been used as the only sensor in these systems. The SM-2MR Standard is inertially guided during its mid-course phase, but it is assisted by a COLOS system via radar link provided by the AN/SPY-1 radar installed in the launching platform. Line-Of-Sight Beam Riding Guidance (LOSBR)LOSBR uses a "beam" of some sort, typically radio, radar or laser, which is pointed at the target and detectors on the rear of the missile keep it centered in the beam. Beam riding systems are often SACLOS, but do not have to be; in other systems the beam is part of an automated radar tracking system. A case in point is later versions of the RIM-8 Talos missile as used in Vietnam - the radar beam was used to take the missile on a high arcing flight and then gradually brought down in the vertical plane of the target aircraft, the more accurate SARH homing being used at the last moment for the actual strike. This gave the enemy pilot the least possible warning that his aircraft was being illuminated by missile guidance radar, as opposed to search radar. This is an important distinction, as the nature of the signal differs, and is used as a cue for evasive action. LOSBR suffers from the inherent weakness of inaccuracy with increasing range as the beam spreads out. Laser beam riders are more accurate in this regards, but are all short-range, and even the laser can be degraded by bad weather. On the other hand, SARH becomes more accurate with decreasing distance to the target, so the two systems are complementary.

Maenner hoert auf zu jammern ... :-) Was interessiert es einer Eiche, wenn sich eine bloede Sau dran reibt!!! Ich bin Ostdeutscher und arbeite seit 15 Jahren bei der NATO. Was glaubt Ihr, was ich mir schon alles sagen lassen musste??? Koennte Buecher darueber schreiben. 76.IAP-Blackbird hat recht! Lasst uns Spass am fliegen haben und der Rest der Welt kann uns mal ...

Nice Story ... But either the first two pairs of MiG`s were not MiG-17 "Fresco" or the first two pairs cannot fire AA-2 "Atoll". The Mig-17 cannot load such a AA-Missile at the Vietnam Theater & I guess even not later. The AA-2 cames up with the MiG-21F ... :-) Never the last a nice Story!

Nur eine kurze Anmerkung. Die Komoran (egal ob Komoran 1 oder Komoran 2)ist/war eine Anti-Schiff Waffe (ASM) und garantiert keine EOGR! Beide Versionen hatten einen Radar-Suchkopf. Neben dem Durchmesser- bzw Gewichtsbeschränkung würd ich auch mal schauen, ob das Erscheinungsjahr stimmt. Viel Spass noch!