Silverbolt Posted June 1, 2008 Posted June 1, 2008 (edited) Hi guys i saw that in other forum , so what about we play here too? that's the way it works: Someone start with a question(in case I'm the first so that me) and the first that right the question(and who made the question confirm) can post another question(involved with aviation) and the next one that right again do another question and etc. all level of knowledge question are welcome. here it goes.... Which was the misunderstand designation that NATO give to Fencer in mid 80's? ex: Su-xx Edited June 1, 2008 by Silverbolt Quote
+lindr2 Posted June 1, 2008 Posted June 1, 2008 They called it the Su-19... Su-19 is FIRST OFFICIAL name of Su-17M3, be cause Su-17M3 has more differents from Su-17 in fuselage construction, but it's name not accept in AF, and Su-17M3 was accepted. Quote
Viper6 Posted June 1, 2008 Posted June 1, 2008 Ok here goes one; Why were some american fighter planes not given a "F" designation? Quote
+lindr2 Posted June 1, 2008 Posted June 1, 2008 Hi guys i saw that in other forum , so what about we play here too? that's the way it works: Someone start with a question(in case I'm the first so that me) and the first that right the question(and who made the question confirm) can post another question(involved with aviation) and the next one that right again do another question and etc. all level of knowledge question are welcome. here it goes.... musli was right, but real plane, who has Su-19 name sometimes is Su-17M3... It's like "Sapfire-22" history: Most Mig-21 was two variant of radar: 1) RP-21 (early variant is RP-9-21) "CD30-T" family - (CD-30T, CD-30TP, R-1L, R-2L); 2) RP-22 "Sapfire-21" family - RP-22S, RP-22SM - "Sapfire-21M" ect. Sapfire-22 NEVER EXIST! Quote
+Muesli Posted June 1, 2008 Posted June 1, 2008 Means I get to pop the question, right??!! Ok, here it is: What was Kurt Tank's best known post-war aircraft design? Quote
+lindr2 Posted June 1, 2008 Posted June 1, 2008 Man that Iron Curtain was something huh? Why was? I work for russian MoD and write some soft for new russian planes, and >80% press releases of our planes is DESINFORMATION, i dont know why, i not work with press... P.S. And I CAN't SAY TRUE, WHAT I KNOW... Quote
+lindr2 Posted June 1, 2008 Posted June 1, 2008 Means I get to pop the question, right??!! Ok, here it is: What was Kurt Tank's best known post-war aircraft design? IAe.33 Pulqui II - simple question... Quote
+lindr2 Posted June 1, 2008 Posted June 1, 2008 Ok here goes one; Why were some american fighter planes not given a "F" designation? You speak about before 1948 US Army AF planes?, like P-51 (Pursuer-51) or not? Quote
Viper6 Posted June 1, 2008 Posted June 1, 2008 You speak about before 1948 US Army AF planes?, like P-51 (Pursuer-51) or not?Yes and you are correct! P-47, P-51...etc Quote
+Muesli Posted June 1, 2008 Posted June 1, 2008 IAe.33 Pulqui II - simple question... Actually lindr2, there was another, better known aircraft, which he designed. The Pulqui didn't make such a great name for itself. Better luck! Quote
Silverbolt Posted June 1, 2008 Author Posted June 1, 2008 (edited) Guys, Muelsi is Right, Su-19 the source is: Weapons guide "Fighters-And modern strike planes"(Vol.1?) Author: Bill Gunston Pubilshed originaly by Salamander Books ltd(1980) Sorry for delay, but i wasnt here hehe Edited June 1, 2008 by Silverbolt Quote
Silverbolt Posted June 1, 2008 Author Posted June 1, 2008 Means I get to pop the question, right??!! Ok, here it is: What was Kurt Tank's best known post-war aircraft design? Marut ? Quote
+Muesli Posted June 1, 2008 Posted June 1, 2008 Hahaha, Silverbolt. It is correct. The Pulqui and Pulqui II were also Tank designs, but not well known to the public. The HAL Marut however is, and is battle proven against Pakistan in several skirmishes between '63 and '85. So, it is yours Silverbolt. Take it away!!! Muesli PS: I know that book, that Gunston guy made a lot of funny stuff up in his "career". Quote
Silverbolt Posted June 1, 2008 Author Posted June 1, 2008 (edited) Okay, 249 F-16A / C U.S. were sent to the Gulf war. Among the F-16C, were several of the block 40, called Night Falcon, could carry out attacks because night with the lantrin and LGBs in precise attacks. However for some reason, they could not use that kind of weapon / sensor. question. 1) How many F-16 in war and could use this apparatus LGBs attack using? 2) Why the F-16 that had this ability rarely lantrin could use in war? Edited June 1, 2008 by Silverbolt Quote
Silverbolt Posted June 2, 2008 Author Posted June 2, 2008 (edited) Okay, well, any one? 72 F-16 Could carry this pod, but all of those were Assigned to be used in F-15E. i'll send another.... Aim-9E is a late sidewinder than Aim-9D, but why the D version had a superior performance than E? and Why USAF didn't used the D version? Edited June 2, 2008 by Silverbolt Quote
+JediMaster Posted June 2, 2008 Posted June 2, 2008 I thought the 9D was a USN version? I don't remember exactly. Quote
Silverbolt Posted June 2, 2008 Author Posted June 2, 2008 well, not for it, hehe looking in technical side Quote
SkyStrike Posted June 2, 2008 Posted June 2, 2008 Ok here goes one; Why were some american fighter planes not given a "F" designation? If you're referring to the USAAF fighters, especially the WWII veterans like the P-38, P-40, P-47, P-51, P-61, etc they were given the designation 'P' which stands for 'Pursuit'. (the Navy fighters had the 'F' designation though.. eg. F4F, F6F, F4U, F9f etc) All American fighter planes recieved the 'F' for 'Fighter' designation after WWII, when the USAAF became the USAF... Quote
gerald14 Posted June 2, 2008 Posted June 2, 2008 What was the last Russian MiG-21 used? and what is the date? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.