darkjak Posted November 9, 2008 Posted November 9, 2008 (edited) Hi. I'm thinking of creating a future fighter for my campaign. I'm starting my 3D course next week My thought has been to create a J35 Draken-ish aircraft. I photoshopped up the below image. My idea is to make the aircraft stealthier, have more hardpoints, have dual AKAN's like the older Draken versions. I'm also thinking to make the plane dual engined, and I'll see if you can reverse-thrust aircraft. And of course, it's supposed to have a hook so it'll be able to land on an aircraft carrier. The name of the aircraft's to be AJS 40 Fenix. Anyone got any more ideas? Edited November 9, 2008 by darkjak Quote
+76.IAP-Blackbird Posted November 9, 2008 Posted November 9, 2008 delete the small fin in the middle, put a second engine on it and split the vertail. rework the nose section to get a F-22 shape on it caus eof stealth Quote
triplethr3at Posted November 9, 2008 Posted November 9, 2008 add canards to the front section just behind the intake add bombays one on each wing for sidewinders and one larger one in the midlle for amrams or bombs. (u could put aditional outside hardpoints) refueling probe two seats Theres tons of stuff u could do ultimatley ur only limited by ur imagination ....and patience when using the 3d max Sounds like a sweet plan tho Quote
Silverbolt Posted November 10, 2008 Posted November 10, 2008 Well, honestely i think this Double-Delta Wing Configuration is out of date for Modern Warfare. Quote
darkjak Posted November 10, 2008 Author Posted November 10, 2008 Well, honestely i think this Double-Delta Wing Configuration is out of date for Modern Warfare. The only drawback with double delta is that it tends to superstall, and that it has somewhat limited manouverability. Both those issues were planned to be fixed in the J35 MOD, which was to have foldable canards. Double Delta enables a small aircraft to carry lots of weapons both internally and externally, as well as plenty of fuel. The Draken was for a very long time the only aircraft that could reach Mach while climbing, if I remember correctly. And we're talking about an aircraft that first flew in the 50's. Imagine a modern dual-engined aircraft with modern, more light engines (the JAS 39 Gripens engine weighs about a third of the Draken engine, yet provides better thrust), and carbon fibre body. That should result in a stealth joint strike fighter capable of flying at M2.5+. Double delta should also in theory be very stealthy because of it's few angles. Quote
Spinners Posted November 10, 2008 Posted November 10, 2008 (edited) Slightly off topic but the Draken was a very advanced aircraft for its day and the radar in the 'F' version was the longest-ranged in Western Europe until F-15's arrived in Bitburg (and I'm not forgetting the Phantom). Back on topic, a good source of ideas are the Tony Butler 'secret project' series of books and also www.secretprojects.co.uk http://www.secretprojects.co.uk/forum/index.php Edited November 10, 2008 by Spinners Quote
darkjak Posted November 10, 2008 Author Posted November 10, 2008 (edited) To proove that an aircraft with double delta configuration could work on amodern aircraft, I've photoshopped a F-22 into looking somewhat what a dual engined double delta aircraft might look like: As you can see, the aircraft is bigger, and has fewer angles than the regular F-22. Making this a somewhat better bomber/strike aircraft. Any thoughts? Edited November 10, 2008 by darkjak Quote
Rambler 1-1 Posted November 17, 2008 Posted November 17, 2008 pretty good, but I'd change up the tail fins and engine exhausts, least it look like another F-22 clone. Also, the swedish jet designers seem to be minimalists, and their planes are usually small, light and efficient. otherwise, looks like a perfectly legit 5.5 gen fighter! Quote
+aleks Posted November 17, 2008 Posted November 17, 2008 pretty good, but I'd change up the tail fins and engine exhausts, least it look like another F-22 clone. Also, the swedish jet designers seem to be minimalists, and their planes are usually small, light and efficient. otherwise, looks like a perfectly legit 5.5 gen fighter! cute this f-22....but it was also a proposal made from boeing, called b-22, in order to cover with existing technology and limited development costs a substitute for f-111 and a plane more capable than f15e.it had also two more bomb bays at the wings, for small diameter smart bombs.a proposal lost somewhere in pentagon Quote
darkjak Posted November 17, 2008 Author Posted November 17, 2008 pretty good, but I'd change up the tail fins and engine exhausts, least it look like another F-22 clone. Also, the swedish jet designers seem to be minimalists, and their planes are usually small, light and efficient. otherwise, looks like a perfectly legit 5.5 gen fighter! The question is however, where should the Saab team go from here? With the SuperGripen, all the Gripen's old flaws will be gone (range, carying capacity). My natural thought is stealth, and even more range. Quote
johnrey Posted November 17, 2008 Posted November 17, 2008 To proove that an aircraft with double delta configuration could work on amodern aircraft, I've photoshopped a F-22 into looking somewhat what a dual engined double delta aircraft might look like: As you can see, the aircraft is bigger, and has fewer angles than the regular F-22. Making this a somewhat better bomber/strike aircraft. Any thoughts? Try checking this out: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FB-22 The FB-22 is in the foreground. And this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:DoD_Loc...ST-87-12789.jpgThe original Lockheed Advanced Tactical Fighter concept (1986) Just suggesting. Quote
+Gocad Posted November 19, 2008 Posted November 19, 2008 The question is however, where should the Saab team go from here? With the SuperGripen, all the Gripen's old flaws will be gone (range, carying capacity). My natural thought is stealth, and even more range. I guess that depends on who's ordering it... Quote
juliejamson Posted December 23, 2008 Posted December 23, 2008 Its really nice wish you good luck !!! Quote
+JonathanRL Posted December 23, 2008 Posted December 23, 2008 Making it have a hook for Carrier Ops may be cool, but not very practical. Sweden has never needed and unless the world around the floods and turn Stockholm into the only Island in the area, they wont need one either. It has been the luxuary of Swedish Defence to focus more on weapons, interception speed and agility then range. Otherwise, its a nice idea. Keep it up! Quote
darkjak Posted March 10, 2009 Author Posted March 10, 2009 Making it have a hook for Carrier Ops may be cool, but not very practical. Sweden has never needed and unless the world around the floods and turn Stockholm into the only Island in the area, they wont need one either. It has been the luxuary of Swedish Defence to focus more on weapons, interception speed and agility then range. Otherwise, its a nice idea. Keep it up! Sorry I've been gone. Actually Sweden is currently more and more participating in foreign operations, so the natural evolution is an aircraft carrier version. Saab were planning to make a carrier based Gripen, and they still might do it if anyone with the need wants them. Range is also something that the Gripen is getting improved. Exams have been pure hell the last few weeks, but now I'm back with a new concept image. And even if there never will be another Double Delta fighter (which I believe there will), it's still fun to have it in the game! When will I start? I don't know, maybe tomorrow. Quote
darkjak Posted March 13, 2009 Author Posted March 13, 2009 First days progress on the aircraft: Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.