mustang60348 Posted December 22, 2008 Posted December 22, 2008 http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081218/ap_on_...itan_protection MONEY IS THE ROOT OF ALL EVIL Quote
Roopod Posted December 22, 2008 Posted December 22, 2008 Beverly Hills lawyer pleased with the ruling. Doesn't that say it all. Liability still to be determined though. Says it was her friend too. Maybe that should be changed to a former acquaintance. Then again, I even know not to move an accident victim unless it is to save them from further injury or imminent death. That's from being over four decades old though too. Quote
serverandenforcer Posted December 22, 2008 Posted December 22, 2008 And this is why I refuse to take those first aid courses at work. They claim that you're protected under the good samaritan law. Now that's the biggest, stinkiest pile of B.S. that I've ever heard. Quote
Jarhead1 Posted December 22, 2008 Posted December 22, 2008 " miss, miss, excuse me, can u sign this 40 page document saying ur not gonna sue me if i try to help u?" "No? F*$# you then" "Yes? I need u to sign in all the 30 million spots that are highlighted, and ur initials and ssn. Thank you. Now i can save u and help you" God its pathetic when thats what u have to do now!!! Quote
eraser_tr Posted December 22, 2008 Posted December 22, 2008 The woman who pulled her from the car feared the car was going to explode, that's "further injury or imminent death" but they don't report if the car did explode. There's alot more information needed: what injury caused the paralysis, how that injury was sustained, I would think if the injury caused paralysis it would have been from whiplash, not pulling someone from the car. Unless she pulled her out by the neck or seriously contorted it in the process. Was she conscious and alert enough at the time to tell she wasn't paralyzed before her friend pulled her from the car? Though I would have to agree with the court, that pulling someone from a car doesn't count as medical care. It's only a ruling for if a lawsuit can go forward, either way. Quote
serverandenforcer Posted December 22, 2008 Posted December 22, 2008 (edited) The woman who pulled her from the car feared the car was going to explode, that's "further injury or imminent death" but they don't report if the car did explode. There's alot more information needed: what injury caused the paralysis, how that injury was sustained, I would think if the injury caused paralysis it would have been from whiplash, not pulling someone from the car. Unless she pulled her out by the neck or seriously contorted it in the process. Was she conscious and alert enough at the time to tell she wasn't paralyzed before her friend pulled her from the car? Though I would have to agree with the court, that pulling someone from a car doesn't count as medical care. It's only a ruling for if a lawsuit can go forward, either way. The problem that I see from this is that the public will hear this, and it will discourage people from ever wanting to help a stranger in need. If the court ruled that due to the circumstance of the situation that the woman who pulled her friend from the car lacked the expertise knowledge of how to identify the situaion and therefore was in a position of limited options to take and chose the most logical one from what she saw, and therefore the lawsuit against her shall not go forward, then this would rest the case and secure the "Good Samaritan Law." Unfortunately, this case here proves that in the story of the Good Samaritan in the Bible, all the people who passed up the traveler who was mugged were wise for not helping. The most ironical thing about that story is that the traveler was Jewish who was helped by a Samaritan, in which those two groups did not get along with each other well at all; yet, there were no repricussions against the Samaritan for helping the Jewish traveler. In this case today, it was a woman helping her friend, and now she is being sued by that "friend". This really shows how far humanity has decayed to being a species of absolute filth and rot. Edited December 22, 2008 by serverandenforcer Quote
Jimbib Posted December 22, 2008 Posted December 22, 2008 What a total bitch that Van Horn woman is, she makes me want to bust her f*cking kneecaps. Quote
Icarus999 Posted December 22, 2008 Posted December 22, 2008 The problem that I see from this is that the public will hear this, and it will discourage people from ever wanting to help a stranger in need. If the court ruled that due to the circumstance of the situation that the woman who pulled her friend from the car lacked the expertise knowledge of how to identify the situaion and therefore was in a position of limited options to take and chose the most logical one from what she saw, and therefore the lawsuit against her shall not go forward, then this would rest the case and secure the "Good Samaritan Law." Unfortunately, this case here proves that in the story of the Good Samaritan in the Bible, all the people who passed up the traveler who was mugged were wise for not helping. The most ironical thing about that story is that the traveler was Jewish who was helped by a Samaritan, in which those two groups did not get along with each other well at all; yet, there were no repricussions against the Samaritan for helping the Jewish traveler. In this case today, it was a woman helping her friend, and now she is being sued by that "friend". This really shows how far humanity has decayed to being a species of absolute filth and rot. Brilliant observation, sums it up nicely. Quote
Salamander67 Posted December 23, 2008 Posted December 23, 2008 Fascinating. In my country it's the other way around. If one witnesses an accident, one is legally obliged to help as much as one can. I don't know what will become of this world if people starts suing their helpers, not to talk about their doctors (which is happening already). Quote
Muesli Posted December 23, 2008 Posted December 23, 2008 Decay of civilisation, I say......... I have been a military medic and have used my knowledge to help others. If this happened to me, I think I would step in my car and pay that friend a visit. A typical act of a selfish money-horny person who doesn't realise this lawsuit will mean the end of people helping out strangers. I grew up NOT to be an egocentric bastard, which brought me in the situation I am in now, but behaviour of persons like her make good people step back and give room to people who do not give a sh*t. And there's already lots of 'em! Just my 2 cents... Quote
Dload Posted December 23, 2008 Posted December 23, 2008 (edited) Pitiful. Van Horn is crazy. Hey maybe that car crash made her crazy! Edited December 23, 2008 by Dload Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.