+Julhelm 266 Posted October 1, 2010 or what's known as "bubbling". Take an innocent pic like this: And turn it into this: And you can bubble anything: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Abhi 3 Posted October 1, 2010 man ur crazy,ur definately crazy. i mean wat kind of idiotic thing it is that,still its funny, Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FastCargo 412 Posted October 1, 2010 Bored today are we? FC Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gr.Viper 131 Posted October 1, 2010 I wonder if you can make a pilot in full g-suit and a helmet look naked this way. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Nixou 25 Posted October 1, 2010 I wonder if you can make a pilot in full g-suit and a helmet look naked this way. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JediMaster 451 Posted October 1, 2010 If there's no exposed skin, that would be very difficult! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gr.Viper 131 Posted October 1, 2010 What if it's just one finger? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MigBuster 2,885 Posted October 1, 2010 or what's known as "bubbling". Take an innocent pic like this: A quicker way you would think would be to type "Naked girls" into Google Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gr.Viper 131 Posted October 1, 2010 type "Naked girls" into Google Will Obama be a first page hit then as well? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Silverbolt 104 Posted October 1, 2010 Julhelm worked on an iPhone app that makes this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lexx_Luthor 57 Posted October 2, 2010 Julhelm that's very interesting. I'd imagine advanced cammoflage ideas hope to use de-railed visual prediction to conceal or trick an observer for a very brief moment, and often a brief moment of confusion on the part of the observer is what deceptive cammo (image) needs to work. In a way, those bubbled girls are similar to deception jamming, but on an infinitely more complex level dealing with human eye and brain. Cool stuff thanks. Now, going further: I notice less deceptive image creation looking at the male Obama than the females. I'm a guy. So this could be a factor on my part. On the other hand, the bubbling may not work as effectively on the male because only one part is bubbled, and the bubble is large, larger than required, and obvious. Females require at least two bubbles, and more numerous bubbles can have relatively smaller sizes, fooling the brain more. Does this sound like Correct Thinking? lol Experiment: Find a pic of guys like the girls, and bubble them in two ways. Use just one required bubble per male, and then use extra bubbles assuming they are female. See if it makes a difference to at least male perception. Then maybe bubble up pics of non-humoid objects. Interesting stuff Share this post Link to post Share on other sites