Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

why don't they do it at a very high altitude? and try to avoid making too much noise..

unpleasant to the pilot to be making this kind of mistake, but sh*t happens..

Posted

I think they are authorised to do this in such an emergency - and Im not totally sure that flying higher solves the problem - Concorde always had this issue.

Posted

I know their authorized to do that..

don't know how higher altitude will help the problem, but it wouldn't hurt to find out I guess :blink:

Posted

If they where chasing a Helicopter, then going to high attitude would have meant a sharp dive in supersonic speeds.

 

The identity of the helicopter pilot is still unknown.

 

"Where he was flying to and what he was doing is none of our business," said Mr Tinworth.

 

"People are allowed to fly in the UK because we're a free country."

 

I like this guy.

Posted

Okay with the Supersonic side of it, the pressure from sonic booms caused by aircraft often are a few pounds per square foot. A vehicle flying at greater altitude will generate lower pressures on the ground, because the shock wave reduces in intensity as it spreads out away from the vehicle, but the sonic booms are less affected by vehicle speed.

 

As to the Euro's checking out the chopper easiest way is to intercept at low-level and then slow down when you get near him. Also the RAF have to request Authorisation to go supersonic overland.

 

Also a Gazelle can carry quiet a bit of stuff that goes bang... so better getting to it quick than taking your time...

Posted

When the shuttle would decelerate overhead here the boom was hardly damaging. It would at worst rattle a plate or two. Now at the landing site, where the orbiter finally went subsonic and was at its lowest altitude, it could be rather jarring especially if you were outdoors. However, totally average cars and trucks had no problems with broken/cracked windows or anything like that. I forget exactly what altitude it would be at when it dropped below Mach 1, but I believe it was ~40,000 ft or so. Lower altitudes would certainly enhance the effect, of course, and it's possible that a cumulative effect (if say planes caused booms many times a day over a given area) could cause damage, to say nothing of waking anyone who's sleeping, day or night (forget keeping babies asleep for naps!).

That said, I know in an emergency it should be allowed.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..