Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Didn't realise anyone had actually ordered any.............................

 

 

 

Programme delays have postponed the delivery of 37 RAC MiG-35 advanced multirole fighter aircraft ordered by the Russian air force until 2016, instead of this year as originally planned.

Yury Borisov, deputy defence minister, blamed the hiatus on the industry's "unreadiness to fulfil the contract".

"We are shifting the purchase of the MiG-35s to 2016 and will buy 16 MiG-29SMT aircraft for now," Borisov says. "The finance ministry is not against this," he adds.

Borisov's comments on 20 August follow a report a few days earlier in the Russian business daily Kommersant that revealed the order, which the paper said was worth $1.1 billion, had been delayed.

 

 

 

http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/russia-delays-air-force-mig-35-deliveries-to-2016-over-industry-snags-389723/

 

 

Posted

Is not the first time, that RSK MiG is unable to deliver planes in scheduled timeframe. Look to India and the MiG-21Bison. It had a delay by some years.

Posted (edited)

Hello,

 

About the MiG production plans I suppose the MiG-29K for Russian & Indian navies is a top priority!

 

An interesting video: http://indrus.in/multimedia/video/2013/08/19/assembly_of_mig-29k_naval_fighters_28617.html

 

And,... is there news about the "MiG-E" project? Few years ago I read this fighter project had to replace the Fulcrum family!

 

Many thanks for the link,

 

Best regards,

 

Coupi.

Edited by Coupi
Posted

I've seen nothing on any MiG-E project myself - was this another Stealth fighter?

 

 

Nice video though 

 

AFAIK the new MiG-29K (9.41) Fulcrum D has similarities to the MiG-29M (9.61) Fulcrum E

 

The MiG-35 Fulcrum F should surpass both on paper - although I would think Indian upgrades to the K might bring it close in the future

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..