Peugeot205 Posted May 20, 2014 Posted May 20, 2014 I have a computer with an Intel Core i5 , 6 Gb of Ram , an nvidia Geforce with Cuda of 1024 mb , the settings of the game are unlimited expect for the shadows that are medium and and the horizon line which it is set to close, with that specifications and configurations my F-1 works like a missile in the game.
jeanba Posted May 20, 2014 Posted May 20, 2014 (edited) I only have a Q6600 with 4 GB of Ram Edited May 20, 2014 by jeanba
DaniloE31 Posted May 20, 2014 Posted May 20, 2014 Hello Danilo, I am sorry you feel that way. We have not had a lot of complaints about the performance, could you detail your PC specifications? Our model is only 27,000 triangles all included so the poly count is really not excessive, even if not as low as stock aircraft.... Oh after all no reason to feel sorry. I know that freeware is not a Wishing Well I think my bottle neck is my video card ATI HD4800 (1GB) ... How is your game performance affected by other high-detail planes like the TMF F-14 or Ravenclaw's F-4s or Buccaneer? Neither the one nor the others installed here... you guess why... Danilo
Centurion-1 Posted May 20, 2014 Posted May 20, 2014 Hmm yeah probably the video card. One idea, you could try to use the old Mirage F.1 with the new cockpit? If the low resolution does not bother you. Anyways, with the new Mirage F.1 we tried to match the best level of detail in the community to make it somewhat "future-proof" so it would not look dated in just a year or so. We also wanted to exceed the level of detail seen on the stock aircraft. The tradeoff is that for some users the performance will suffer... 1
+Coupi Posted May 20, 2014 Posted May 20, 2014 (edited) Hello, Intel/NVidia system W8.1 64 (4x 3.4Ghz/8 Go RAM/2 Go GTX670)... no real fps killing with these beautiful Mirage F1s! @JMBalestre... why not adding 2 Go RAM! Can't wait the next F1s... Edited May 20, 2014 by Coupi
DaniloE31 Posted May 21, 2014 Posted May 21, 2014 ... Our model is only 27,000 triangles all included so the poly count is really not excessive, even if not as low as stock aircraft. ... The problem isn't the poly count of the A-Lod itself, the matter is that in an air battle the 27000 triangles are rendered up to a distance of 10000m, because you don't have efficient, low poly B- and C-Lods... If you consider how many F1s probably are in the radius of 10Km... you have the picture But please don't take this as a criticism, thta's now just a technical discussion
+ludo.m54 Posted August 10, 2020 Author Posted August 10, 2020 V2.0 is uploaded and waiting for approval. I hope you will enjoy the new 3D model. Have fun. 3
+ludo.m54 Posted December 31, 2020 Author Posted December 31, 2020 Here's a quick fix for the Mirage F1C_73. The low poly models are not the latest version. Just copy/paste the files in the MF1C_73 folder and overwrite. MF1C_73.7z
+ludo.m54 Posted May 18 Author Posted May 18 The Mirage F1C (1973-1981) has been upgraded to the version 4.0 It will be available soon. 1
+ludo.m54 Posted June 25 Author Posted June 25 We found a small bug in the version 4.0 We fixed it in the version 4.0.1 If you already downloaded the version 4.0 we also uploaded a hotfix. It will be available soon. 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now