Jump to content

Open Club  ·  15 members

EAWPRO

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I forgot this, I hope you don't mind when I keep pointing out R/S issues on 3D models, I mean it's not like pointing out "buggy" 3D shadows in EAWPRO for not liking them but a real bug.  It's not an attack on anyone in particular either but merely intended to maintain a high standard, and I for one do care about it. I don't feel it's particularly attractive to new players to see such porblems in screenshots. Any progress with the cunningtower?

VonBeerhofen

Edited by VonBeerhofen
Posted

Doesn't matter to me what you post.

In fact, it makes my case.

Players do not care one whit if there is an occasional, minor R/S issue.

They do care about having a huge number of aircraft to chose from, multiple scenarios with well over 2000 different ground targets in those scenarios, different payload packages for their aircraft with all sorts of additional weapons and most importantly, when something is posted it is already available, NOT some time in the distant future.

An Ideologue, OTOH, posts picture after picture of "perfect" models that will never see the light of day and brag about a dubious  expertise to an ever shrinking group of followers.

See the difference?

Relax and have some fun or adhere to a strict protocol and suffer within the constraints of a smothering ideology.

I know which one I prefer.

Posted (edited)

Brag? I think you mistake the word with dedication and strive for improvement. And where did you get the notice from that my group of followers is shrinking? EAW's following is definately shrinking but my group is fine, taken into account I have little aspirations.

I wouldn't worry much about my perfect models, I know who my followers are and they will get them.

VonBeerhofen

Edited by VonBeerhofen
Posted

Dizzy Dean, one of our great baseball players, once said "It ain't bragging if you can do it".

My contention is that since it's rare that one of your models ever sees the light of day, indeed you are bragging, not doing.

Posted (edited)

Yes, I've become VERY carefull in picking my friends and handing out my creations, I think the reasons for that are pretty obvious. Hope you don't mind me keeping control over my own work, it's all too easy for others to pretend that they were it's creators. Think this thread will be locked soon too, hope the moderators understand that I'm just defending my work. I'm done with this guy anyway.

VonBeerhofen

Edited by VonBeerhofen
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, rotton50 said:

 Doesn't matter to me what you post.

In fact, it makes my case.

Players do not care one whit if there is an occasional, minor R/S issue.

They do care about having a huge number of aircraft to chose from, multiple scenarios with well over 2000 different ground targets in those scenarios, different payload packages for their aircraft with all sorts of additional weapons and most importantly, when something is posted it is already available, NOT some time in the distant future.

An Ideologue, OTOH, posts picture after picture of "perfect" models that will never see the light of day and brag about a dubious  expertise to an ever shrinking group of followers.

See the difference?

Relax and have some fun or adhere to a strict protocol and suffer within the constraints of a smothering ideology.

I know which one I prefer.

No offense, but perhaps you paint with too broad a brush re your comment on what Players prefer.  There is a wide spectrum of Player tastes and preferences, and to say that Players care about one thing to the exclusion of others goes too far, I think.

As for myself, I am visually-oriented, and can usually see details in aircraft that some others might gloss over, or perhaps not detect at all.  It is a niggling bother--to me, at least-- when the depiction of an A/C contains visual errors.  The presence of such errors often causes me to question whether the Modder has done due diligence to other, unseen, aspects of the A/C, such as Flight Model, and so forth.

I know that some issues are not easily corrected, but that does not reduce the responsibility of the Modder to do his/her very best to "get it right".  I understand that others will have different preferences.

I prefer to not discuss your other remarks.

Edited by RIBob
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..