Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

So well,the remaining problems of J-20 are basically beyond my ability to solve in a short period of time. I still need time to study , so I decided to publish them first. I hope you guys enjoy.:drinks:

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2
Posted

Will you be doing early versions of the PLAAF weapons by chance? I realized that you only did the later ones, and maybe have to stick with what's his name's pack.

Posted (edited)
9 hours ago, EricJ said:

Will you be doing early versions of the PLAAF weapons by chance? I realized that you only did the later ones, and maybe have to stick with what's his name's pack.

I do have plan for making some of the early models yes, but for now PL-5B will keep the oldest lol. 

Relatively speaking, I know more about current period better, that is why mordem sticks are first tier, for the rest, I may need to do more research. 

Besides, many of the PLAAF's early weapons were imitations, like Magic R.550 → PL-7, Python3 → PL-8, Basically only textures needed to be repainted.Most of them have nice model so we don't have to worry.

Edited by simonmiller416
  • Like 2
Posted
9 hours ago, simonmiller416 said:

I do have plan for making some of the early models yes, but for now PL-5B will keep the oldest lol. 

Relatively speaking, I know more about current period better, that is why mordem sticks are first tier, for the rest, I may need to do more research. 

Besides, many of the PLAAF's early weapons were imitations, like Magic R.550 → PL-7, Python3 → PL-8, Basically only textures needed to be repainted.Most of them have nice model so we don't have to worry.

Ahh cool to hear. I found the angelp pack (I think I had it installed earlier) so that will tide me over and the like, thanks for the reply.

  • Like 2
Posted

J-20 update has been released and is awaiting approval. It is mainly an iteration of the canard function, which will act as a traditional flap during takeoff/landing and have independent operating logic.

J-35 (navy variant) is out too,unfortunately, it has similar small aerodynamic model problems as J-20s, but not obvious most of time.

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)

Something pretty new from Zhuhai Airshow 2024,still waiting for more information, I may make one for SF2.

It looks like a fold-fins variant which probably would let J-20/35 carry 6 round in their bay(now is 4 with PL-15), but its name conflict with former export type of PL-15.

15f6c31c4571989ae535cc189235d8dc.png

Edited by simonmiller416
  • Like 5
Posted

Ah, me again.How are your today?

So, I need a few tester ,if you are interested please DM me.

Basically this is based on several PLA modern ships. About a year ago, I found that many people involved in the test reported that they would encounter CTD when summoning them.

The strange thing is that this never happened in my SF2. This problem has troubled me for nearly a year.

I recently had a CTD situation after deleting the Flightengine.ini in the Flight folder for some testing needs, the I put it back, no CTD.  

I did make some changes to Flightengine.ini for performance optimization.

Maybe I caught a rat, but I need more evidence...So if you are interested in participating in this test, please let me know.

img00103.jpg

img00265.jpg

img00287.jpg

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)

Oh, I saw some news about USAF F-16's IVEWS in recently months,I think at least some separate modeling is needed, fake pilot things etc.

Skin work is not a big deal, I made HAVE Glass V template already.

If I can do more about original Viper model would be wonderful.

Maybe I will add it to the list but it's long enough.:lol:

Edited by simonmiller416
  • Like 2
Posted
2 hours ago, simonmiller416 said:

I did make some changes to Flightengine.ini for performance optimization.

Hello ! Could you send me your file in order to compare with my modifications ? P. :biggrin:

  • Thanks 1
Posted
14 hours ago, simonmiller416 said:

If I can do more about original Viper model would be wonderful.

i would talk to ravenclaw_007, he has the original Team Viper max files and would be likely willing to adjust or share. he does new work on them as he is able to and can knock most requests out quickly so long as you have good reference material for him to work with

  • Like 3
Posted

I'm also working on Patriot SAM, but just a question, do you happen to have a directory on when and how many PAC2 or 3s are being deployed by various operators?

Giving these units a suitable look in SF2 is another matter, I am more obsessed with making them "historically accurate".

The information I was able to retrieve was very fragmented, it would be better if there was a summary list.:good:

 

=====================================================================

For now, what I made for SF2:

Missiles:

MIM104B/C/D/E/F;

Radar with Engagement Control Station Set(SAM_RADAR):

①MPQ-53 + MSQ-104 (For early PAC-2)

②MPQ-65A + MSQ-132 (For PAC-2/GEM)

③MPQ-65A + MSQ-132 (For PAC-3)

Launcher Station(STATIC_SAM):

①M903 + MIM-104C/PAC-2

②M903 + MIM-104D/PAC-2(GEM)

③M903 + MIM-104F/PAC-3

 

Any suggestions are welcome:drinks:

83c027d741835108959a19a4e1cec93e.png

02ad96cf13ab8676f0af7137fab2ce56.png

88781ac702f56098cffebae3950fd1a1.png

5e3f65a254bb1af33a6a9ae8e890391a.png

  • Like 6
Posted

I mean wiki should work for a list of operators, but yeah I've been looking for a good Patriot for a long time for SF2. But I'm sure you got that already in your searches as I don't know myself either.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, EricJ said:

I mean wiki should work for a list of operators, but yeah I've been looking for a good Patriot for a long time for SF2. But I'm sure you got that already in your searches as I don't know myself either.

Yes I mainly got operators info from wiki, but I feel like it's too fragmented, so I wanted to ask if anyone happens to have a complete list and would be willing to share it generously.

But that's okay, I can still just spend more time learning:biggrin: I have learned a lot.

Edited by simonmiller416
Posted

Yeah as unreliable it is sometimes, I use it because I don't know enough people to ask those kinds of questions overall. For some things I can ask, but as far as operators and the like I tend to use Wiki, but yeah I got you.

Posted

its interesting that there doesnt seem to be a book just on Patriots. on Scuds sure. on the HAWK sure. but non on MIM-104....

looked in my collection of books and no joy. also got curious and googled just to see if there was a book (led to the above observation). still no joy :dntknw:

  • Like 1
Posted

Yeah all I found were manuals and other stuff too, so looks like Wiki is the only way to list them. I mean the beauty of ini files is that you can always update them as more info comes along.

  • Like 2

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..