Jump to content

Dels

MODDER
  • Posts

    690
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    27

Everything posted by Dels

  1. I don't know if it's the best, but I just use planar mapping.
  2. From my limited knowledge, looking at the picture you provided, nothing seems to be wrong. What you can try is: -Deselecting the Self-illumination box -Converting the plane to a mesh and UVWMapping it Dels
  3. LOL! Quote Brian Fantana: "50% of the time, it works every time."
  4. Thanks for the reply. I had thought about that, but the pitch angle for the X-29 should be 0. I might give it a try anyway using OnGroundPitchAngle=0.0.
  5. Hi guys, Still working on the X-29 at the moment and I have a small problem. This one's got me. I have never encountered it with any of the aircraft I have built. As soon as the mission had finished loading and you're into the cockpit view, the aircraft is about 6 feet in the air and about 5-10 degrees nose up. From there it immediately falls back onto the runway, bounces around a bit and then all is fine. I'm not sure why it starts in the air or with a nose up attitude. I have tried changing the ShockStroke entries for the landing gear which reduces the distance the aircraft drops from, but that doesn't fix the nose high attitude and creates other issues (wheels half in the runway and a shock stroke of 1 metre is far to big). I was wondering if anyone else has had this problem before, or knows how to fix it. Thanks Dels
  6. In real life, that Viper would only be able to taxi from it's parking position to the holding point and back before it called BINGO fuel.
  7. I have found that you generally have to animate flight control surfaces and gear extension in 3dmax, but you can also .ini edit to get the canopy, gear shock absorbers and airbrakes to animate.
  8. Dels

    Q-5D

    Yeah, change the Right Gear max deploy speed to 125. It's 12 at the moment.
  9. Sorry this is OT, but I have a hard drive with a mechanical failure of the motor. I would love to get that info off there, but the only places I could find that do it cost $2000+. Do you know of anywhere cheaper?
  10. Yep, it has Wingtip rails, three underwing pylons on each wing and a centerline pylon. Pretty much the same as the F-16.
  11. Yeah, I was going to "age" some of the things in the F-23 pit and make it less modern. Re: PSD's, I will upload them to the skins section when the aircraft is released. I'd be happy to help with the X-31 and 32.
  12. While we're all deciding on a name, I thought I might put up some pics. Still to do: 3d model - Cockpit, some animation, texture mapping Flight model - Almost done, but still some little tweaks Skins 3d cockpit - I'll be adapting my F-23 cockpit for this so it won't take that long Dels
  13. Yeah, I was hoping that some input from the forum might make the decision easier but I think the opposite was true. The release is still a way off, so we have some time still. :yes:
  14. Good point. Might be something to consider.
  15. FYI, the General Dynamics FSW proposal based on the F-16 was nicknamed the "Saberbat". During testing, the X-29 picked up the unofficial nickname of "Polecat." Not sure about that one.
  16. Ok, it seems that one thing is for sure...we can't agree on anything. Thanks to everyone for their continued input an support of this thread. Please continue to make suggestions as we might come up with a name that really fits. Just for stamps, here's a little info regarding the X-29 and it's relationship to other aircraft: The nose section is off an F-5E. The main landing gear and control surface actuators come off an F-16 and the engine is the F404-GE-400 out of the F-18A/B. The rest of the aircraft was purpose built. For my F-29A I've decided on the F404-GE-402 out of the F-18C/D because it's the same size but more powerful.
  17. Ok, well at this stage I'm leaning toward Warhawk II, but what do people think of Rapier?
  18. I agree about Razor. If I included Hellcat II in the poll would people prefer that to Warhawk II? Or am I
  19. Geez, I really stirred up a sh*t storm here didn't I? Do we need a new poll, or should I just decide on a name myself?
  20. Only just!
  21. Here's a pic from Max of the gun port.
  22. It's decision time. You can vote for more than one name. Name with the most votes wins.
  23. Sure, I'm not at my computer at the moment, but I'll upload a pic later.
  24. About the cannon, no. I have replaced them with a M61 in the lower right side of the nose. Let me take the time now to make this disclaimer: As this aircraft never went into service and consequently was never fitted with weapons etc. I have taken some artistic licence. If anyone is overly miffed by this, I'm happy to discuss.
  25. I also don't have a problem with it.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..