-
Posts
8,418 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
42
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Downloads
Store
Everything posted by Fubar512
-
Screenshot Thread
Fubar512 replied to Dave's topic in Thirdwire: Strike Fighters 1 Series - General Discussion
Missed, damnit! -
You must either script your own mission, or reclassify warships as "cargoships", with the nationality set to generic, and let the system select them at random. I believe that there's a three-ship maximum for the cargoship classification, so the system will only use the first three, including the default TW cargoship. Scripting your own missions yields the best results, as you can use multiple ship types within the same mission, and even setup ship-to-ship surface action.
-
It's sort of a non-official "community" WIP at the MF, and I have no idea on when it will be ready, or, even if it will be made available for public release. I do not even have permission to name the artiste responsible for this project The model still needs work, as only one of the two Kashtan CIWS mounts is currently animated (the main 2x130mm mount works, though). It also has a few "holes" in the model file (.lod) that need to be patched, and it needs to be texture-mapped. Otherwise, it's nicely, no, make that amazingly detailed, for what I gather is the modeler's first effort.
-
Odd nose shadow
Fubar512 replied to Delta6Actual's topic in Thirdwire: Strike Fighters 1 Series - General Discussion
Another possibilty is that it's either pilot or seat shadows. -
Screenshot Thread
Fubar512 replied to Dave's topic in Thirdwire: Strike Fighters 1 Series - General Discussion
-
the weapons dissapear
Fubar512 replied to t-50's topic in Thirdwire: Strike Fighters 1 Series - General Discussion
Even we seasoned TW veterans refer to the KB once in a while. -
the weapons dissapear
Fubar512 replied to t-50's topic in Thirdwire: Strike Fighters 1 Series - General Discussion
I have a suggestion, read the knowledge base. If you had done that first, you'd have known better than to have applied an update onto anything other than a fresh install. -
Nope. Those are Pulse-Doppler systems. "In 1963 Westinghouse was awarded a US Navy contract for the AN/AWG-10 to provide fire control for guns and Sparrow and Sidewinder air-to-air missiles on the McDonnell Douglas F-4 Phantom. The first radars were delivered in 1966 and became standard equipment. The AWG-10 was claimed to be the first interceptor radar to feature transistorised circuitry. During 1966 the US Navy announced a look-down requirement for its F-4s and the AWG-10 became the first multimode radar with pulse Doppler look-down capabilities and a comprehensive built-in test system. During 1973 Westinghouse was contracted by the US Navy to improve the performance and reliability of the AN/AWG-10. The most significant change affecting reliability was the substitution of a solid-state transmitter using a klystron power amplifier. A digital computer was added for the more effective solution of launch equations, for example target manoeuvring information was included. A servoed optical sight display was also added and these modifications permitted the full range of air-to-ground ordnance to be exploited. Only three of the AWG-10's 29 LRUs remained unmodified; there were six new LRUs and seven units of the AWG-10 system were deleted. The success of the AWG-10A computer led to its procurement by the US Air Force for the APQ-120 radar in the F-4E to provide computer-aided target acquisition. The German Air Force, in a programme known as Peace Rhine, also procured the computer to upgrade its F-4F Phantoms. Status The AWG-10 family has long been out of production, but is still in widespread service. In early 1984 the US Defense Department announced the possibility of flight demonstrating McDonnell Douglas F-4s with new engines and avionics suites, to create a new market for F-4s currently in the US inventory. A fundamental change in the avionics would be the replacement of the AN/AWG-10 with the Westinghouse AN/APG-66 used in the Lockheed F-16 fighter."
-
The unit's ability to jam Continuous Wave Radar, as in the Hawk's CWR unit, that relies on changes in frequency to plot target course & position, via Doppler shift.
-
Added a few more weps and ground objects to SF2 for testing, and then flew a SEAD mission against an SA-10 battery, in an F-4 (yes, I equipped it with the appropriate ECM pod). Fired Shrikes at the Flaplid radar, but wound up taking it out with bombs during a low-level pass. Monty CZ's SA-10 battery, or rather, what's left of it Get nailed by an SA-6 while I was egressing, though...
-
This should be of some assistance to those who are modeling radar and ecm systems: Military Radar Bands (EU, NATO, US ECM frequency designations) Band Frequency Notes HF 3 - 30 MHz High Frequency VHF 30 - 300 MHz Very High Frequency UHF 300 - 1000 MHz Ultra High Frequency L 1 - 2 GHz S 2 - 4 GHz C 4 - 8 GHz X 8 - 12 GHz Ku 12 - 18 GHz K 18 - 27 GHz Ka 27 - 40 GHz mm 40 - 300 GHz millimeter wavelength ECM Bands (EU, NATO, US ECM frequency designations) Band Frequency A 30 - 250 MHz B 250 - 500 MHz C 500 - 1,000 MHz D 1 - 2 GHz E 2 - 3 GHz F 3 - 4 GHz G 4 - 6 GHz H 6 - 8 GHz I 8 - 10 GHz J 10 - 20 GHz K 20 - 40 GHz L 40 - 60 GHz M 60 - 100 GHz When setting an ECM system, first look up the system type (in this case, we'll use the AN/ALQ-167), and check to see which frequencies or bands that system jams. Looking up the AN/ALQ-167 on GlobalSecurity, yielded the following info: http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/sys.../an-alq-167.htm In theory, an ECM system can jam a radar by emitting only 1/2 the potential energy of that radar, as the radar's beam has to travel twice as far as the ECM's emissions in order to first paint a target, and then receive the reflected signal, whereas the jammer's signal simply has to reach from the host platform (aircraft), to the radar's receiver.
