Jump to content

Flanker562

MODERATOR
  • Posts

    13,490
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    64

Everything posted by Flanker562

  1. Which was why I removed it and don't want to see the issue on the topic again.
  2. I've seen a 9J do that to a QF-100D one time but since it had such a crappy warhead it only flaked the paint off
  3. No problem man
  4. These might help:
  5. Not a Hun freak either but that's nice
  6. Hahahaha nice....
  7. Would be nice to compare it on my Hard drive
  8. Okay I deleted the posts concerning the backwards compatibility issue. Fact is that this is not the point of the topic and therefore should be moved elsewhere and I meant it, though maybe I should have been more strong in my opinion. Fact it was devolving into a more personal rather than constructive fight. So Go Somewhere Else and debate all you want but I'm not having it here.
  9. Look at FC's B-1B (03) as that has a "Sniper Sensor" which works as cocas describes.
  10. I'll send them over when I'm done Seriously I think after Lexx_Luthor blesses off on it I'll send it over....
  11. One for the road.
  12. Would this shot work? And okay with the L&R I guess you can specify which ones need to go on the R then?
  13. The Falconer is the one I was waiting for as I can use them in Afghanistan for the Taliban to shoot down....
  14. Okay so that's pretty much it then?
  15. yeah but the lack of pictures threw me off that's all. You're good as long as there's a picture attached.
  16. Well... fair enough I guess but I guess when you throw out names for stuff I need a visual picture so I can at least understand how it all works, I think I came across wrong on that one as names as text don't help me, but pictures with names and positions do
  17. No offense but lets not get too excited about names and such... most of this stuff I just need for you to say "Put this kind of label/sticker/panel here" so when I get done with adding the panels I can use some generic era-specific stuff... The area I have to work with doesn't have the resolution for real text so it's going to be squiggly lines or such...
  18. Well unless you find another source I'll put it on one side And ok
  19. No worries and an easy fix... The top image on just the port side or repeated on the starboard side?
  20. I'll agree with that, the J-20 realistically is just fugly, the PAK-FA has smoother lines fo sho
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..