Jump to content

UllyB

ELITE MEMBER
  • Content count

    1,677
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    14

Everything posted by UllyB

  1. Damn! An all inclusive ? I really feel pain I had missed this one LOL
  2. We encourage you to do more :). Any contribution to the game is welcome.
  3. It's a good idea to compare in weapons editor the default values in the here around weapons packs with the ones you have into your folder. Maybe you changed there something or something is wrong. If that won't solve yoour issue let me know which missile exactly are you talking about and I will show you my settings.
  4. Oh boy, where do I even start.... I don't have a certain one but I can give you some names that impressed me over the time. SAAB 37 Viggen Mirage IIIC/2000D MIG - 29/ MIG - 31/ MIG - 25 SU - 34/SU - 35/Su - 27/ SU -25/ SU- 24/ SU - 30SM Kfir C2/ Shahak Tsniut YAK -38/141 TU-22M3/TU - 95/Tu - 160 F-4/F-16/F-15/F-117/F-22/F-A 18/ F -14/ F -105G Jaguar / Tornado F3 Sea Harrier Rafale M Eurofighter 2000 PS - However, I lost my virginity with F-4 if that is making any sense LOL
  5. Now is that point, it seems, where things get interesting. I can't wait to see where all this is going! :p
  6. " .. in fact someone says that Vietnam war was lost on TV! " LOL I'm a '64 born so I saw some of it at TV news. I am kindda akin to Vietnam war era. I loved all sims about it and played them all. In fact I can say I never felt I had enough of them until this very day. I loved how that F-4 Phantom ugly bird looks. I always have.
  7. Did you eat your cookies and the milk ? Did you behave all this time ? Whaaaat? You didn't ??? LOL Well, anyway St Nicolas has news for you.We are officially launching our AIDC T-5 Brave Eagle (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AIDC_T-5_Brave_Eagle) thread. Our AT-5 is almost done, some details still remain to be nailed down. As you might know by now, AT-5 is a trainer that has ability to carry most weapons the F-ck-1 could, except radar guided A2A weapons and the TC-2A anti-radiation missiles. It has no gun so we took the initiative to create an external gunpod for it. Model itself is finished, though we might have to add an additional mesh to the back seat for the Hud repeater among other things. Since the AT-5 is a F-ck-1 modified version, we created templates for the AT-5 fuselage and updated them many time during the development. We still have some work here and there, for instance to adjust panel lines and the fade-in parts for the gills and airscoops. We planned, for now, just three skins for it (see the first two pictures and the last one included) though they will be a (real) challenge for the team given their complexity but I think we will manage it in the end. Decals are already planned to be implemented for it, too. We like the details so for the prototype we'll build a slightly different AC.lod with additional antennas. We made brand new pilots for the plane and we will also update soon the F-ck-1 with these new created pilots for it, too. Given the present period of the year and the fact that some members of the team will take soon a well deserved holiday, we will have important news for you at the end of the January, next year. Until then we will work to the skins and to some left details. Stay tuned. PS - I included four pictures as well for our model.
  8. With some significant delay we will restart soon "the engine" to our project. Stay tuned! https://ibb.co/v1WnM1C
  9. Sir, there is a valuable tutorial to do exactly that signed by our esteemed collegue MIGBUSTER in the knowledge base. Please take a look.
  10. yeah, first a new haircut, second the muffins sold on the corner's coffee shop are great! LOL Welcome back bro!
  11. I think we'll be the last ones joining the party cause we have a serious delay caused by issues in real world, but we're getting there...:)
  12. I reported the facebook page for link to piracy (it's a link to the game on MediaFire of the SF2 NA gamekit), for IP infringement and for not asking permission for IP work. I also reported on ModDB the page for IP infringement and publishing material without authors consent.
  13. Well, maybe not as much as you should LOL
  14. I am not familiar with the mod you are talking about. This what I suggest you to do: - read carefully ALL that modder who made the mod says there. - don't hesitate to contact, via PM, the author of the mod, to give you suplementary explanations if you feel you need them Usually these mods just tap into some new or modified terrain and they did that on a (modified) stock map. The common problem is often the path to that exe file. If it is wrong , them the game won't know what "executable" to start, taking into account that the mod was tested and it works as it should. Wrench is Maitre extraordinaire (I love this title LOL) du terrains, so your best bet is to approach him and ask for help on the matter on hand. If he is not busy and you catch him in a good mood (a very important condition LOL) he might explain to you, after taking a look to the files (smacking you around a bit too), what is really happening there. But if he's not in a good mood, well...if I were you I would run as far and as fast as I can LOL However the situation he will help you eventually so I would keep the spirits high on this one. :)
  15. They are fake just to induce envy into members ;) LOL
  16. Make sure you have something similar. I use the Strike Fighter Israel 2 as default "game" and interface. Click on the attached picture to zoom in.
  17. Thx for the insight, it helped.Though I still remember a little chemistry from school, I didn't know that this mix is yellow. I know how Zinc looks like, I know how Chrome look like, but I never seen the new chemical substance resulted from the mix.
  18. primered in zinc-chromate = abundent in zinc/chrom combination or I missunderstood ?
  19. Dassault Mirage IVP

    Very nice model, congratulations !!
  20. Ok, if that comment was just a suggestion for the ones who are keep wondering about cockpit choices made, then I can see your point. Not hearing the tone/voice of someone who just writes a message can be , sometimes, deceiving and submitted to interpretations. Taking into account that, in your statement you were not referring to anyone specific, I just assumed you were talking to me (the initiator of the whole thread), that is why I chose to answer to you.
  21. This is a poll for community MOST WANTED aircraft. This time, as a sponsor I will let the wonderful CombatAce community to choose what aircraft will want to be built as a sign of my appreciation and respect for it. Please vote the plane you want from those three categories. Keep in mind that you may vote just ONCE in each category and that just ONE PLANE in the end and one plane only, which has the most votes, will be chosen and built. In case of a tie, I, as sponsor and project manager, will have the final word. The vote starts today and it will be close in two weeks, on February the 27, 12 PM CET. Make a wish ! ;)
  22. As I answered to Michael (see the post above yours), I am telling you, too, that the F-18 cockpit has nothing to do with our choice to hook this plane up to a cockpit. It's just the test cockpit that was used, and that's the all of it, it just remained that empty entry there, in the cockpit.ini file. If it would have been other cockpit, the same, you or anyone else, would have asked why that one and so on. Now do you see where I am getting with this ? Furthermore, there is not a single statement in this thread, in plane download page's file or anywhere else on this website where we, EVER, said that there will be used the X, Y or Z cockpit for this plane. So why do you keep asking that I wonder folks ? Don't get me wrong, I am not upset because people are keep asking that, I'm just puzzled that people are asking that, instead of seeing the simple obvious...
×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..