Svetlin

Yes, there are ways (not just one): - fake pilot/seat method; - fake fuel tank method. Here is the proof:

Paulo, all special thanks go to you only for the dedication and attention even to small air forces such as ours. Thank you, my friend, and I am waiting patiently for the time when you get to MiG-21 :-)

+1

OK, I am now sure it is an issue with the model itself, not a problem with the aircraft data.ini. I deliberately deactivated the rails intended for Python 3 and then took a screenshot of the rails for Sidewinder. I am sure the aicraft data.ini is calling the correct rails, but the inner and outer IRM rail under the left wing appear to be closer to eachother than those under the right wing. The effect is missiles appear as if improperly attached (floating). See attached screenshot. Using the supports under the inner pylon as a reference point, you can see the rails under the right wing are separated and do not touch the supports, while the rails under the left wing clearly touch them. Apparently the rails under the left wing need to be a little bit more separated from the pylon to be identical to the rails under the right wing.

OK, re-downloaded, placed it in several separate SF2 installs I have and the problem is still there. Look at the picture - the Pythons under the left wing are in mid-air. What's more, even when I loaded Sidewinders, they appear on the same rails.

OK, thanks, will do later today and report back.

Guys, I am facing a problem with the IRM launch rails on the left inner pylon. As I get it, there should be small rails, with small spacing to the pylon, used to load Sidewinder and may be Python 4. Then there should be larger rails, with greater spacing to the pylon to allow loading of Python 3. For some reason only the small rails with small spacing appear under the left wing, causing Python 3 missiles to just hang in mid-air. I checked the out file and also the data.ini, but could not see the cause of this issue.